Hello,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59 AM, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote:
> Currently Debian has the ruby-kakasi package.
> The original upstream was hosted in RAA, but it was
> closed last year.
>
> OTOH, there is a new ruby binding for KAKASI in
> rubygems.
> https://rubygems.org/gems/kakasi
> https://
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Per Andersson wrote:
> (Answering on-list.)
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> 2014-04-29 2:16 GMT+05:30, Per Andersson :
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> What does +gh in the version mean? :-)
>>
>> To show we are using gihub tarballs instead
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> I updated the following packages to build against newer gem2deb:
>
> ruby-mathml, ruby-rdiscount, ruby-mustache, ruby-oauth,
Did these four... (you left an UNRELEASED in ruby-oauth)
> ruby-color-tools, ruby-twitter4r
Didn't have t
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> ruby-spreadsheet (0.7.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Team upload
> * New upstream version
This is also a significant change, but as there are no rdeps, it is
less important.
On its way.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSC
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> ruby-echoe (4.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Team upload
> * New upstream version
> * Build against gem2deb >=0.3.0~
> * Bump Standards-Version: to 3.9.3 (no changes needed)
> * Update copyright to DEP-5 copyright-format/1.0
> *
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> I've updated ruby-sigar to a new upstream version and to build with
> gem2deb >=0.3.0. The package is lintian clean and builds fine in a clean
> environment.
>
> Here is the last entry of the changelog:
>
> ruby-sigar (0.7.2-1) unstable;
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> ruby-sexp-processor (4.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Team upload
> * New upstrean version
> * Imported Upstream version 4.0.0
Is it wise to upload a new major version so close from the freeze
for a package with reverse dependen
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> I've updated ruby-ronn to build with gem2deb >=0.3.0. The package is
> lintian clean and builds fine in a clean environment.
>
> Here is the last entry of the changelog:
>
> ruby-ronn (0.7.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Team upload.
>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
>> To coordinate this mass-upload, I would like to invite everyone to the
>> "upload parties" held on the IRC in the #debian-ruby channel (on the
>&g
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
>> * why do you include a copy of jquery.js in the package ? I fail to
>> see the point, if it is available from libjs-jquery. If you have to
>> have it available at build time, build-depend on libjs-jquery and make
>> appropri
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> To coordinate this mass-upload, I would like to invite everyone to the
> "upload parties" held on the IRC in the #debian-ruby channel (on the
> OFTC/irc.debian.org) Tuesday, 26 June and Friday, 29 June from 18:00
> till 0:00 CEST (+0200).
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> I pushed to the repo a new version of ruby-cmdparse. The package builds fine
> in a clean environment and is lintian clean. Here is the entry of the
> changelog:
>
> ruby-cmdparse (2.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream versio
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> I pushed to the repo a new version of cucumber. The package builds fine
> in a clean environment and is lintian clean. Here is the entry of the
> changelog:
>
> cucumber (1.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream versio
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
>> On 20/06/12 at 21:34 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> > But that's not all. In order to have packages compatible with
>> > rubygems-integration, they need to be rebuilt with gem2deb > 0.3 (not
>> > uplo
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 04/06/12 21:14, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> I've checked that it works changing from ruby to
>> ruby1.8. You probably should try to use ruby1.9.1-dev at a later date.
>
> I'm not the maintainer, I was
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Does gdal need an explicit Build-Depends: ruby1.8 instead of ruby;
> would that cause the buildscripts to pick the right include paths?
Yep. The problem is that the calls to ruby with the package ruby
installed now install th
Hi Youhei,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> At Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:03:35 +0200,
> Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>
> - snip -
>> Hmmm. It seems it got lost somehow... Don't forget to set the suite
>> to unstable and not UNRELEASED ;-
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>>> I think Vincent suggested the other way around: name the single package
>>>> ruby-kramdown, since it is more likely to be used as a *library* ins
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>> I think Vincent suggested the other way around: name the single package
>>> ruby-kramdown, since it is more likely to be used as a *library* instead
>>> of an application. This will also make i
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> Vincent: Sorry for my late response.
No problems !
>> I think Vincent suggested the other way around: name the single package
>> ruby-kramdown, since it is more likely to be used as a *library* instead
>> of an application. This
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> The following packages are ready to be uploaded.
> Could you please sponsor them?
>
> Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-ruby-extras/kramdown.git
> Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/kramdown.git;a=summary
>
>
> T
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Francesco Poli
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:15:09 +0100 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>
> Hi! Thanks for your kind reply!
>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Francesco Poli
>> wrote:
> [...]
>> &g
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Francesco Poli
wrote:
> The most general issue is that apt-listbugs needs to perform the
> following steps (when run in "apt" mode):
>
> * first it reads some input through its STDIN, through a pipe
>
> * when this input ends (EOF), apt-listbugs needs
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> I want to add a new package from an existing gem (I am upstream author).
> I'd like to know how to avoid the rubygems dependency in the ruby gem
> library.
> The package indeed depend on an other gem. If I remove the require
> 'rubygems' fro
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Terceiro
>> In the file /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb, it gets argv
>> from the caller, but does not pull the installation directory from
>> there. Rather, it sets "package" to the result of "packages.first", and
>> installs to that i
as team uploads unless someone complains (and beats me
to it ;-)...).
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Donkey: No one told me I had the right to remain silent !
Shrek: You *have* the right to remain silent. What you lack is the capaci
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond escreveu isso aí:
>> That also means that we should add this particular feature
>> (precedence of the vendor dir over system dir in RUBYLIB path) in
>> the Ruby policy.
>
> Yes, and
s that we should add this particular feature
(precedence of the vendor dir over system dir in RUBYLIB path) in the
Ruby policy.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Some pirates achieved immortality by great deeds of cruelty
and derring-do.
Hello !
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
> I've just updated gen-ruby-trans-pkgs in gem2deb to do The Right Thing,
> and will upload a new version of gem2deb soon.
Please wait ;-)...
> Please double check your packages and make sure your new ruby-foo
> `Breaks: libfo
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
>> [...] I'll commit the changes to the Build-Deps in a few minutes. Please
>> fix the copyright file for -matchers. In the meantime, I can upload
>> *-context, if you wish.
>
> Please. :)
All done...
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Vincent Carmona wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am investigating bug #629578 [1].
> It seems that there is 2 versions of libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8 in sid.
> I do not know why the last one (0.3.2-3) did not overwrite the 0.2.0-1.
It just did:
~ dak ls libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8
Hi Antonio !
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
> I need someone to sponsor these 3 packages I have been working on:
>
> ruby-shoulda
> ruby-shoulda-context
> ruby-shoulda-matchers
>
> All of them are in pkg-ruby-extras git repo, and ideally they should be
> uploaded togeth
On 06/06/11 19:47, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> Done. Do you mind if I upload a new version, then ?
>
> Actually I noted that the changelog was missing two entries I should
> have added before, so since I have to go add them anyway I've just
> uploaded myself. You are welcome to upload in the futu
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
> Sounds good, thanks. I suggest a small change on your tests to make the
> test output cleaner (see the attached patch).
Applied, thanks.
> You can go ahead and merge this branch on master. Please delete the
> branch afterwards.
Done
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
>> Attached is another output of git-format-patch that does all of
>> that. Unless you spot something wrong in them, I'd be glad to merge
>> them myself to master this time ;-)...
>
> Very nice, thanks. Don't want to nitpick, but I didn't l
Hello,
librmagick-ruby was FTBS and blocking the imagemagick transition due
to a bug in imagemagick 8:6.6.9.7-2. Now that version 8:6.6.9.7-3.1 is
slowly spreading into unstable, a rebuild for the librmagick failed
binNMU should get the transition going. If I understand
wanna-build.txt correct
Hello Antonio,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
>> Attached is .tar.gz archive of the current contents of the setuprb
>> branch that adds support for setup.rb installations to gem2deb. It now
>> contains tests (that even pass!), so I think it is complete enough for
>> m
Hi all,
Attached is .tar.gz archive of the current contents of the setuprb
branch that adds support for setup.rb installations to gem2deb. It now
contains tests (that even pass!), so I think it is complete enough for
merging into master. Unless someone has objections to that, I plan to
do perf
Hi Lucas !
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
>> I'm unsure about that: the testrunner.rb uses the source directory
>> as library path for loading the test files. Of course, this will work
>> for pure ruby libraries, but, at least for setup.rb, it will fail
>> miserably fo
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Some points:
>
> • The packaging didn't so far include a Ruby 1.9.1 version - I checked
> it and it works perfectly \o/
;-)...
> • The gem2deb infrastructure no longer builds the HTML
> documentation. Now, in order to build the documentat
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
> Taking ruby-taglib2 as just an example, it contains binaries for both
> Ruby 1.8 and 1.9.1 in a single package.
>
> % apt-file list ruby-taglib2
> ruby-taglib2: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/taglib2_ext.so
> ruby-taglib2: /usr/l
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
>> > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/gem2deb.git;a=commitdiff;h=fb547d84b5545ac5dee8de9023ccae51d5cf61da
>> >
>> > So you should be good by overriding install_files_and_build_extensions
>> > on your new class.
>>
>> I've done tha
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> On 12/05/11 at 14:50 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> > It would be nice to have automated tests for this new class.
>>
>> H... A bit later ?
>
> No emergency, as long as there are some when the
file RC bugs on packages not
complying with a MUST directive.
I'm glad to acknowledge the direct contribution of Antonio to the text
of the policy, and that of Lucas for early comments.
Cheers,
Vincent
- --
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
your new class.
I've done that, and did as well for tests so far, but just stating it
is currently not supported. I need to dig a little more into this.
> after (or instead of) `setup.rb clean`, shouldn't you also do `setup.rb
> distclean`?
> (I think ruby-pkg-tools does somethin
On 11/05/11 18:46, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond escreveu isso aí:
>> On 11/05/11 17:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> As Lucas wrote, setup.rb seems to be really deprecated. But if Vincent
>>> is willing to write the code, IMO go ahead and write a proposal so
On 11/05/11 18:46, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond escreveu isso aí:
>> On 11/05/11 17:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> As Lucas wrote, setup.rb seems to be really deprecated. But if Vincent
>>> is willing to write the code, IMO go ahead and write a proposal so
On 11/05/11 17:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> As Lucas wrote, setup.rb seems to be really deprecated. But if Vincent
> is willing to write the code, IMO go ahead and write a proposal so we
> can discuss in more concrete terms.
It's in principle ready...
> I have only one requirement: instead of
[putting back debian-ruby, I don't understand how it got lost]
On 11/05/11 14:59, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/05/11 at 14:56 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> On 11/05/11 14:50, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> But for rmagick, it seems that the hooks only deal with doc
On 11/05/11 14:39, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/05/11 at 11:51 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> Does anyone object to integrate a support for setup.rb directly into
>> gem2deb (something similar to the old cdbs class) ? That would be a
>> second auto build system (say
On 11/05/11 14:39, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/05/11 at 11:51 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> Does anyone object to integrate a support for setup.rb directly into
>> gem2deb (something similar to the old cdbs class) ? That would be a
>> second auto build system (say
things as consistent as possible.
I'd be glad to write it.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Comme dit mon tonton: plus on est de cons, plus ça se voit !
-- La Tordue, Où va-t-on
Vincent, not listening to anything fo
Hi !
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> Shouldn't we remove ctioga2, and only keep ctioga in the archive?
In this case, the other way around. But as ctioga2 is quite fresh,
I'm waiting for others to switch. I'm actually thinking of eventually
having ctioga2 providing a
Hello all !
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
>> > What you are asking for is not a policy, it's a howto.
>>
>> I'm asking for both.
>>
>> I think the policy should be a docbook-like document (like the
>> Policy), while the howto probably should be a wiki page.
>
> I'm
e the transition: if people just have to change a bit
the control file but leave the build system as before, the transition
will go very smoothly. Then again, when I get more background on this, I
may want to dig into this.
I hope everything is clear.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmo
cessary
if you want the transition to happen.
A template by dh-make-ruby isn't a policy.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
It was funny how people were people everywhere you went, even if the
people concerned weren't the
Hello there !
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:34 PM,
wrote:
> Your mail to 'Pkg-ruby-extras-commits' with the subject
>
> [SCM] packaging for ctioga2 annotated tag, upstream/0.2, created.
> upstream/0.2
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
> The reason it is bei
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
>> That said, if the consensus is on using git, I won't object, I just
>> think we'd spend time migrating the packages to gem2deb rather than to
>> git ;-)...
>
> Yes, I think that the consensus is also that we should switch to git
> (even f
Hi everyone !
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> In case you didn't notice, we are now ready for a mass-migration to
> gem2deb.
Great !
> There are two pages to help you:
> - http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/wheezy/
> (and http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.
ested in these packages:
> ctioga
> libmaruku-ruby
> librmagick-ruby (this one is a mess, though)
> libsetup-ruby
> libtioga-ruby
> webgen0.4
> webgen0.5
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
find(1):
A `%'
emain in the repository? Or
> do they get removed from trunk? Or something different, perhaps?
Just remove them from trunk so everyone knows they shouldn't work on
them. They'll stay reachable in tags, and that's just the way it should be.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vinc
be patched for that or
not.
In the hope of having been helpful...
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
His followers called him Mahasamatman and said he was a god. He
preferred to drop the Maha- and the -atman, however, and called
himself Sam.
ed to both lists, so
> cross-posting is useless and discouraged.
>
> Does someone object to the above?
This is perfect for me. And to exemplify the above, I'm dropping
pkg-ruby in the reply ;-)...
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspo
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond dijo [Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 10:26:14PM +0200]:
>>> I think that we should switch to using only debian-ruby@ for everything
>>> except commit logs (which go to pkg-ruby-extras-commits@). This matches
>>> what the perl team do
in
;-)...
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
find(1):
A `%' at the end of the format argument causes undefined behaviour
since there is no following character. In some locales, it may
hide your door keys, while in others i
no one opposes to
an upload from my side. I'll do that tonight (it's rather annoying me,
as I'm trying to fix things in webgen - see #525553), unless someone
raises opposition here.
Cheers !
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dont think that anybody has a clear view of all the issues that have
> to be solved, but some of them are:
> - where do we put third-party libs so that they are accessible by
> ruby1.8, jruby and ruby1.9?
Hello,
On Dec 21, 2007 6:44 PM, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've broken my gem configuration once by doing a gem update --system. I
> > think I've cleaned it up completely afterwards, but there may have
> > remained some residual brokenness.
>
> The old gems were still on the syste
n't know how ri lookup works, but it really should return all
documentation installed on the system. Currently, ri files go to
/usr/share/ri/$version/ , so we might want to install ri documentation
into /usr/share/ri/dist/$version ?
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Develo
be first /usr/local, then /usr/lib/ruby/dist, and finally
ruby's stdlib)
- we must change all the packages currently in the archive (painful).
The good news is that only a minor tweak of ruby-pkg-tools would do the
trick for most packages but the ones configured and tweaked by hand.
Ch
On 4/23/07, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I understand it correctly, ruby-full will depend only on packages
built from the ruby1.8 source (ie core+stdlib+irb+ri+...). If so, why
not integrate it into the ruby1.8 source package ?
Actually, it would rather be in the ruby source pa
Hello everyone,
I've proposed a while ago the creation of a ruby-full metapackage that
encompasses all binary packages produced by the current stable ruby
source package including in particular the development packages and
command-line tools such as ri, irb and rdoc), so that ruby-talk won't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
A quick look into the interpreters section [in sid] shows that ruby
packages make up nearly half of it:
22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptavail -s Package -FSection
interpreter | wc
Hello !
Look at this:
22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptavail -s Package -FSection
interpreter | wc
411 8229366
22:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ grep-aptavail -s Package -FSection
interpreter | grep ruby | wc
181 3624633
[ some private packages in here, but they don't cou
David Moreno Garza wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> I just find it a pity to read 'debian sucks' on the lists when there's
>> such a simple solution ;-)...
>
> Don't pay attention to trolls and you will live longer.
Those people were not tr
To: Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 01:15:57AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> I don't ask to put them back in on
ady (or nearly so). I'm ready
to give over maintainorship if that is necessary.
I just find it a pity to read 'debian sucks' on the lists when there's
such a simple solution ;-)...
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, PhD student
http://vincent.fourmond.neuf.fr/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -From: Paul van Tilburg Date: Friday, December 22, 2006 11:08 amSubject: Re: Ruby-fullTo: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 01:28:13AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:> > For those of you who don't follow ruby-talk, here is the
stand that, but I also know the reasons behind the split.
So the answer is simple: what about a ruby-full meta-package that
installs basically all the packages produced from the ruby source code ?
Do you think it still would have a chance to make it to Etch ?
Cheers,
Vince
--
Vi
meone to sponsor me.
Cheers,
Vincent Fourmond
--
Vincent Fourmond, PhD student
http://vincent.fourmond.neuf.fr/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yone has any suggestions or would like to contribute, please send me an email. Thanks ! Vincent Fourmond
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Provide URL for source packages, and I'd be willing to sponsor those> modules/apps of my interest :-) Of course ;-) ! The one already in the archive but that needs to be repackaged is tioga:http://theory.kitp.ucsb.edu/~paxton/tioga.html The next one on my to-package list is ruby/GSLhttp://ruby
ut
however, I thought I would find more ruby people here.
Thanks !
Vincent Fourmond
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
83 matches
Mail list logo
