Hi !
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
<lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> Shouldn't we remove ctioga2, and only keep ctioga in the archive?
In this case, the other way around. But as ctioga2 is quite fresh,
I'm waiting for others to switch. I'm actually thinking of eventually
having ctioga2 providing a ctioga transition package.
> The same applies to webgen, and to amrita.
I don't know about amrita, but different versions of webgen are
still quite used. I have recently tweaked them to allow side-by-side
installation of all three, which resulted in a net increase in the
popcon of the latest. The plan is to eventually remove at least the
oldest one (webgen), and possibly webgen0.4 too. But not just yet.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/banlktinhxl75agxuaceggcmuwdbo9op...@mail.gmail.com
