On 11/05/11 14:39, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/05/11 at 11:51 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> Does anyone object to integrate a support for setup.rb directly into
>> gem2deb (something similar to the old cdbs class) ? That would be a
>> second auto build system (say, ruby-setup.rb) that users should select
>> explicitly (to avoid changing the build behaviour). This would allow to
>> keep as much code in common for the ruby build and the ruby-setup.rb
>> build, and keep things as consistent as possible.
>>
>> I'd be glad to write it.
>
> Wouldn't it risk making the gem2deb code harder to maintain?
I realize I've been much too vague in my last email, so here is my
proposition:
* the setup.rb-supporting code would be integrated directly into
dh_ruby.rb, making it easy to share code
* it would be triggered only on a specific option, say --setup-rb
(that must come first of course).
What do you say about that ?
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads.
One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness.
The other, to total extinction.
Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.
-- Woody Allen
Vincent, listening to Overture 1928 [Scene Two] (Dream Theater)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dca8665.9010...@debian.org
