Bug#1104507: RM: samizdat -- ROM; RC buggy, abandoned upstream

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: samiz...@packages.debian.org, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:samizdat This package is unmaintained upstream and two RC bugs. --abhijith

Need help to fix camping

Hello, I planned to upload latest `camping` version 3.2.6 to unstable to fix #1094532. I've imported all changes to salsa. I believe package is not in good shape, as it missing some run time dependencies and due to that, autopkgtest is also failing. I could not figure that out. Need help. --abhi

Bug#1095637: ITP: ruby-dry-logger -- dependency-free logging solution suitable for Ruby application

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Abhijith PA X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org * Package name: ruby-dry-logger Version : 1.0.4 * URL : https://github.com/dry-rb/dry-logger * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ruby

Bug#1095552: RM: raspell -- ROM; Upstream unmaintained, RC bug

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: rasp...@packages.debian.org, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:raspell User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Package is unmaintained upstream. No reverse

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-terser 1.2.4

On 27/11/24 03:19 PM, Vivek K J wrote: > > > On 27/11/24 11:41, Abhijith PA wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 26/11/24 11:43 PM, Vivek K J wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 26/11/24 22:04, Abhijith PA wrote: > >>> Hi Vivek,

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-terser 1.2.4

Hi, On 26/11/24 11:43 PM, Vivek K J wrote: > > > On 26/11/24 22:04, Abhijith PA wrote: > > Hi Vivek, > > > > On 25/11/24 08:54 PM, Vivek K J wrote: > >> Hey Team, [...] > Fixed them and pushed the changes 👍 But you forgot to mention those changes in

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-terser 1.2.4

Hi Vivek, On 25/11/24 08:54 PM, Vivek K J wrote: > Hey Team, > > I've updated ruby-terser from 1.1.12 to 1.2.4. I've verified that all > packages which are depending on this package are rebuilding against this > new version and the package is ready for uploading to unstable. This > will also clos

Re: Package puma failing in arch:ppc64el

Hi, On 19/11/24 01:53 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 07:39:03AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Package puma is not migrated to testing due to build failure[1] in > > arch:ppc64el . Though the last version of puma seems successf

Package puma failing in arch:ppc64el

Hi, Package puma is not migrated to testing due to build failure[1] in arch:ppc64el . Though the last version of puma seems successfully built in this arch. `$ getbuildlog puma 6.4.2-6 ppc64el` I am not sure if its a temporary failure. Is it possible to manually trigger a build for ppc64el in our

Re: custom OPENSSL autopkgtest

Hi, On 07/11/24 05:17 PM, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi Abjith, > > how are you? I am good :) . Thank you for asking. > Am Donnerstag, dem 07.11.2024 um 11:41 +0530 schrieb Abhijith PA: > > > > I see that autopkgtest test-name=ssl is failing in unstable[1]. Do we &g

custom OPENSSL autopkgtest

Hi Daniel, I see that autopkgtest test-name=ssl is failing in unstable[1]. Do we need this test anymore? Just to refresh memory, it was added because of weak ciphers[2] in test suite. And it is fixed in upstream[3] some time ago. I also _don't_ see SSL related upstream test failing. --abhijith

Re: Plans for the next sprint

Hi, On 11/09/24 06:26 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi Abhijith, > > Em 11/09/2024 04:59, Abhijith PA escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > On 11/08/24 12:11 AM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As one of the items we have discussed in the

Re: Plans for the next sprint

Hi, On 11/08/24 12:11 AM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi, > > As one of the items we have discussed in the last two BoFs during DebConfs, > people in the team are interested in organizing a Debian Ruby sprint in > Japan. There we could get in touch with some upstream developers and also > tighten ou

Re: ruby-redis-namespace fix FTBFS #1047604

Hi Vivek, On 18/01/24 03:38 PM, Vivek K J wrote: > Hi Team, > > I've updated ruby-redis-namespace to fix FTBFS bug mentioned in #1047604. > > It was caused by a dump file generated after the first build of the > package, here is the diff: > > --- /dev/null > +++ b/debian/clean > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ >

Re: RFS: ruby-google-cloud-core

Hi, On 25/12/23 06:03 PM, Abhijith PA wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/12/23 02:19 PM, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just updated the package ruby-google-cloud-core from version 1.6.0-1 to > > 1.6.1-1 > > > > > > Kindly check it out at

Re: RFS: ruby-http-parser 1.2.3

Hi, On 30/12/23 05:26 PM, Ananthu C V wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated the package ruby-http-parser to version 1.2.3 to fix > a block in updating diaspora-installer. > > Link to the repo: https://salsa.debian.org/weepingclown/ruby-http-parser > > I'd appreciate it if someone can consider reviewi

Re: RFS: ruby-google-cloud-core

Hi, On 24/12/23 02:19 PM, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated the package ruby-google-cloud-core from version 1.6.0-1 to > 1.6.1-1 > > > Kindly check it out at > https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-google-cloud-core > > it is a requirement for google-cloud-storage, which is

Re: RFS: ruby-flores 0.0.8

Hi Praveen, On 15/12/23 02:56 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >On Fri, Dec 15 2023 at 12:32:17 +05:30:00, Abhijith PA > wrote: > >Hello o/. On 12/12/23 01:49 AM, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote: > > Hi, I just packaged ruby-flores 0.0.8, a build dependency for arr-pm >

Re: RFS: ruby-flores 0.0.8

Hello o/. On 12/12/23 01:49 AM, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote: > Hi, > > I just packaged ruby-flores 0.0.8, a build dependency for arr-pm > 0.0.12, which is a build dependency for gitlab 15.11.6 > > Kindly check the package out at > https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-flores > > Please review a

Re: [RFS] ruby-commonmarker 0.23.10-1

Hello Ravish, On 30/10/23 08:55 AM, Ravish BC wrote: > Hi, > > The following package is updated to 0.23.10 and ready to be uploaded and is > requ > ired for Gitlab 16.2.8 update. > > Could you please sponsor the following new package? > > >ruby-commonmarker 0.23.10-1 >([1]https://sals

Re: Removing packages from archive

Hello. On 12/08/23 02:21 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: > Hi, > > I filed for RM requests of these packages. > Rest packages will be filed after tomorrow. [..] Thank you doing this. It was a long overdue from me. --abhijith

Re: Removing packages from archive

Hey, On 07/02/23 09:48 AM, d...@debian.org wrote: > Hi Team, > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 09:39:12PM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote: > > 16. ruby-terrapin -- run shell commands safely, even with > > user-supplied values > > Reason: RC, builddep ruby-bourne, whi

Removing packages from archive

Hello. Following packages will be filed for removal(RM) from archive as most of them are dead upstream, broken state and no reverse dependencies. 1. redmine-recaptcha -- Redmine plugin to add a reCAPTCHA to user self-registration Reason: RC, dead since 2012 2. rhc -- OpenShift comma

Re: Debian Ruby sprint - Paris February 2023?

Hey, On 10/12/22 06:49 PM, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Samstag, dem 10.12.2022 um 16:54 +0100 schrieb Cédric Boutillier: > > [Ruby sprint] > > For the housing, I have not much inspiration. We could use the same > > AppartHotel place as last time, or try to rent an AirBnB appartment. > > The hotel

Re: RFS: ruby-procto

Hi, On 12/03/20 1:37 am, ki...@disroot.org wrote: > Hi, > > I prepared the packaging of ruby-adamantium. It is lintian clean and tested > with sbuild. Further information about this package can be accessed from the > URL : > > https://salsa.debian.org/hacksk-guest/ruby-procto > also like

Re: RFS: ruby-abstract-type

Utkarsh, On 10/03/20 1:11 am, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi Kiran, > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 9:27 PM wrote: >> Consider to review and upload it. > > Thank you for your work; uploaded! :) > Once it clears NEW, we need to do a source-only upload for it migrate > to testing. I think new packages hav

Re: [RFS] ruby-grape-path-helpers

Hi Nilesh On 04/02/20 12:26 am, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi > I updated r > uby-grace-path-helpers > to version 1.2.0 as required by gitlab. It builds in a clean chroot with > autopkgtets passing. I have pushed my changes here[1]. > Needs

Re: RFS: ruby-diaspora-federation-*

Hi Samyak On 31/10/19 12:13 pm, Samyak Jain wrote: > > Hey, > > I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gems diaspora-federation, > diaspora-federation-rails, diaspora-federation-json-schema. The package > was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also > lintian-clean. I've push

meta/setup fails

Hello. Setting up https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta/blob/master/setup fails in sid machines with following error. - lxc-create: autopkgtest-unstable-armhf: parse.c: lxc_file_for_each_line_mmap: 142 Failed to parse config file "

Re: RFS: ruby-carrierwave

On Monday 28 January 2019 04:39 PM, Abhijith PA wrote: > Hi. Suman > > On Saturday 26 January 2019 08:16 PM, su...@protonmail.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem carrierwave. The package was >> tested on sbuild and was

Re: RFS: ruby-carrierwave

Hi. Suman On Saturday 26 January 2019 08:16 PM, su...@protonmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem carrierwave. The package was > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've > uploaded the package to the alioth repo which may be

Re: RFS: ruby-letter-opener ~ 1.7.0

On Tuesday 22 January 2019 11:16 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *letter-opener*. The package > was > tested on meta/build and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. > I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found a

Re: RFS: ruby-et-orbi and ruby-fugit

On Tuesday 22 January 2019 09:53 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:43:40PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > >> ruby-et-orbi uploaded. > > well, Abhijith PA was quicker than me. > ruby-fugit uploaded too. :) , Sorry I was waiting for ruby-fugi

Re: RFS: ruby-rails-assets-perfect-scrollbar

Hi, Utkarsh On Monday 14 January 2019 02:12 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem > *rails-assets-perfect-scrollbar*. The package was > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. > I've updated the package in the salsa rep

Re: RFS: ruby-uuid

On Friday 18 January 2019 01:30 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:08 PM Pirate Praveen > mailto:prav...@onenetbeyond.org>> wrote: > > > > On 2019, ജനുവരി 17 5:53:19 PM IST, Abhijith PA <mailto:abhij...@teknik.io>> wrote:

Re: RFS: ruby-uuid

Hi Praveen. On Tuesday 15 January 2019 07:51 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2019, ജനുവരി 14 10:34:39 PM IST, Abhijith PA wrote: >> Hi. >> >> On Monday 14 January 2019 10:16 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:42:26AM +0530

Re: RFS: ruby-uuid

Sorry for the late reply. On Wednesday 16 January 2019 10:25 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:42 AM Abhijith PA <mailto:abhij...@teknik.io>> wrote: > > Hi Utkarsh > > On Saturday 12 January 2019 12:55 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >

Re: RFS: ruby-uuid

Hi. On Monday 14 January 2019 10:16 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:42:26AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote: >> Hi Utkarsh >> >> On Saturday 12 January 2019 12:55 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've updated the D

Re: RFS: ruby-uuid

Hi Utkarsh On Saturday 12 January 2019 12:55 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *uuid*. The package was > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. > I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at > h

Re: Error while building ruby-sidekiq-cron

Hi, On Monday 14 January 2019 03:43 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I was building ruby-sidekiq-cron (via dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us) and got > the following errors [1]. > Could someone possibly walk me through the possible workaround? > > [1]: https://paste.debian.net/1060317/ > Some test i

Re: RFS: ruby-json-schema

bian-ruby/TaskTracker/issues/133 You should also state your reason for updating existing package in RFS request. > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 10:19 AM Abhijith PA <mailto:abhij...@teknik.io>> wrote: > > Hi Abraham Raji, :) > > On Sunday 30 December 2

Re: RFS: ruby-json-schema

Hi Abraham Raji, :) On Sunday 30 December 2018 12:54 AM, Abraham Raji wrote: > Hey, > > I updated the Debian package for the ruby gem json-schema. It was > successfully built. I've uploaded the package here > .  > > > Ple

Re: Gitlab in stretch-backports, looking for backup uploaders

On Saturday 22 December 2018 06:07 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi team, > > I have backported gitlab to stretch-backports and its available at > https://people.debian.org/~praveen/gitlab > > > But to be accepted in official stretch-backports , back

Re: RFS: ruby-raabro

On Wednesday 19 December 2018 06:28 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > That would be great. Thank you! Uploaded. Thanks > Let me know if there's anything that needs to be fixed. > Gem fugit can only be packaged after this is done. Hence watiting for > the same. This is a new package and it will be k

Re: RFS: ruby-raabro

Remove Cc:praveen@. He is subscribed to the list. On Wednesday 19 December 2018 12:47 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem raabro. The package was > tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've > uploaded the package to

RFS: ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails

Hello team, The following package is IMHO ready to be uploaded * ruby-bootstrap-switch-rails-3.3.3-1 Please review and upload it. (packaged for diaspora) -- Abhijith PA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

ITP: ruby-state-machines-activerecord -- Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on ActiveRecord

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Abhijith PA * Package name: ruby-state-machines-activerecord Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : Abdelkader Boudih Aaron Pfeifer * URL : https://github.com/state-machines/state_machines-activerecord * License

ruby-launchy

Hi Ruby-launchy is a dependency for ruby-letter-opener. Seems like it has a repo in pkg-ruby-extras , but not uploaded to the archive.Mailed the maintainer, and no reply yet.It will be nice if some DD from here can take care of this.? -- അഭി‍ജിത്ത് signature.asc Description: OpenPGP d

Request to join project

Hello, Hello, I like to join extra ruby packaging team, So I can help the diaspora and gitlab packaging. User Id:355733 Login name: abhijithpa-guest Abhijith PA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature