Hi Praveen. On Tuesday 15 January 2019 07:51 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2019, ജനുവരി 14 10:34:39 PM IST, Abhijith PA <abhij...@teknik.io> wrote: >> Hi. >> >> On Monday 14 January 2019 10:16 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:42:26AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote: >>>> Hi Utkarsh >>>> >>>> On Saturday 12 January 2019 12:55 AM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem *uuid*. The package >> was >>>>> tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It was also lintian >> clean. >>>>> I've updated the package in the salsa repo which may be found at >>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-uuid >>>>> >>>>> This was listed under "Patch Updates" task for diaspora, which may >> be found at >>>>> https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/issues/133 >>>>> >>>>> Please consider to review and upload it. >>>> >>>> There is no change in upstream source other than the person just >> bumped >>>> version in gemspec file. If you can loosen version in its reverse >>>> dependencies there is no need of an upload. :) >>> >>> This sounds like doing a few pointless uploads to avoid a single one. >> :) >> >> In this case, I don't think so. >> >> -a > > Maintaining a patch, especially for a package like diaspora and gitlab, which > already has many patches we cannot avoid, is more work than a simple update.
Its just using current version of ruby-uuid in control file of the package diaspora. Isn't it. I don't understand the need of patch. --abhijith
