On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 14:05:27 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> #732054 has util-linux shipping a systemd timer which can trivially be
> replaced with a cron.weekly script. (Incidentally the systemd
> integration is a bit broken, see #767194.)
>
> I'm surprised to see this happened, and doubt there ar
#732054 has util-linux shipping a systemd timer which can trivially be
replaced with a cron.weekly script. (Incidentally the systemd
integration is a bit broken, see #767194.)
I'm surprised to see this happened, and doubt there are many other cases
like this. At least there are apparently no other
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:44:39 -0400
Albert Huang wrote:
> > 5. as above, important changes that the maintainer feels are needed
> > before release.
> >
> > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
> My intent was based on #5 - the current package(s), as they stand, are
> rather unusable.
ideration in a Debian stable release
> must be allowed time for testing within Debian before the release.
Yeah, I did not consider the time to testing any breakages, etc. in Debian.
> New packages do not meet the criteria for freeze exceptions.
>
> 1. fixes for release critical bugs
I would also like to ask for an exception for a NEW package, tilem.
New packages do not meet the criteria for freeze exceptions.
1. fixes for release critical bugs (i.e., bugs of severity critical,
grave, and serious) in all packages;
2. changes for release goals, if they are not invasive;
3. f
ader/alberth.deb...@gmail.com
Please consider granting freeze exceptions for these packages!
Thanks!
Albert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cakmcsmksedga0bwndyvps7hotrs4tagnffrrykc0rjjuafe...@mail.gmail.com
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 19:08:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> mbrola_3.01h-6
> mbrola-af1_0.0.20040426-2
> mbrola-br3_2.021-2
> mbrola-cr1_0.0.19981028-2
> mbrola-cz2_0.2-2
> mbrola-de6_0.0.20021125-2
> mbrola-de7_0.0.20030404-2
> mbrola-es1_0.0.19980610-2
> mbrola-fr4_0.0.19990521-2
> mbrola-g
Mehdi Dogguy, le Thu 30 Sep 2010 08:48:48 +0200, a écrit :
> patches/debian-changes-0.7-5 | 1038
> -
> patches/debian-changes-0.7-5.1 | 1024
>
>
> I hate that.
I do too, blame the maintainer, not me :)
Samuel
On 09/27/2010 10:40 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a request for freeze exceptions for speech-dispatcher, which
> its maintainer asked me to NMU to fix RC bugs:
>
Unblocked.
> speech-dispatcher (0.7-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Non-maintai
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 21:49:32 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> loadlin (1.6e-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
Here is a request for freeze exceptions for speech-dispatcher, which
its maintainer asked me to NMU to fix RC bugs:
speech-dispatcher (0.7-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* debian/patches/debian-changes-0.7-5: Leave -lpthread in the
libspeech-dispatcher link
Hello,
Here is a request for freeze exceptions for loadlin.
loadlin (1.6e-1) unstable; urgency=low
New upstream release. Fixes VCPI support and loading >8MB kernel+initrd on
machines with 16MiB INT15 memory. (Closes: Bug#588530)
* debian/rules: Add refresh rule.
* debian/control:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 07:50:49AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
>- "Mehdi Dogguy" wrote:
>>On 23/08/2010 19:52, Julien BLACHE wrote:
>>>Julien Cristau wrote:
#590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite...
>>>
>>>Yes, indeed, it is. So a new version of acl would be OK for the
>>
- "Mehdi Dogguy" wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 19:52, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >>> Ping?
> >>
> >> #590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite...
> >
> > Yes, indeed, it is. So a new version of acl would be OK for the
> release
> > team?
> >
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Hi,
>> Nathan, what's the status on your end?
>
> Any news?
No news on the ACL side, and on the libsane side it's a bit late in the
game to come up with a new way of managing permissions, honestly. What's
in experimental right now is not sufficient as it isn't as flexible as
On 23/08/2010 19:52, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> Ping?
>>
>> #590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite...
>
> Yes, indeed, it is. So a new version of acl would be OK for the release
> team?
>
> Nathan, what's the status on your end?
>
Any news?
Julien Cristau, le Sun 19 Sep 2010 14:03:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > mbrola_3.01h-6
>
> Does the path change break any of the existing packages in squeeze?
Only speech-dispatcher uses mbrola ATM, and without this fix it doesn't
work.
> > mbrola-af1_0.0.20040426-2
>
> why the debhelper dependency bu
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 19:08:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> isorelax_2004-4
unblocked
> jing-trang_2009-3
unblocked
> jodconverter_2.2.2-4
unblocked
> jodconverter-cli_2.2.2-5
unblocked
> joptsimple_3.1-3
>
unblocked.
> mbrola_3.01h-6
Does the path change break any of the e
Hello,
Here is a request for freeze exceptions over a bunch of packages, for
similar changes. I'm available on #debian-release this week-end for any
detail discussion.
First, java stuff: I had to change the dependency to adapt to newer
package names.
isorelax_2004-4
jing-trang_20091
Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi,
>> Ping?
>
> #590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite...
Yes, indeed, it is. So a new version of acl would be OK for the release
team?
Nathan, what's the status on your end?
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE | Debian, because code matters more
Debian & GNU
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:42:42 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Ping?
>
#590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite...
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I'm not sure I understand that bug, how you're planning on fixing it, or
>> why you need to use setfacl instead of udev-acl as many other devices
>> nodes already do.
>
> udev-acl is meant for ConsoleKit integration and doesn't do anything for
> you if you
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:00:54 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> I will fix it, re-upload, and re-request a freeze exception.
2.2.0-2 unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Seems we're just talking past each other.
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:53:20 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>> I interpreted "shlibs bump" to mean changing the SONAME. Do you mean
>> something different?
>
> I wasn't talking about the library's SONAME, I was talking abo
Seems we're just talking past each other.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:53:20 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> I interpreted "shlibs bump" to mean changing the SONAME. Do you mean
> something different?
I wasn't talking about the library's SONAME, I was talking about the
shlibs control file from you
Julien Cristau wrote:
I hope you will not take it the wrong way that I'm continuing to argue
this point. We share a common goal of ensuring that this change is safe
and will not cause problems, and I appreciate that you have to act in a
policing role about this issue. I also appreciate that man
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:08:36 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:27:13 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> >
> >> For qpdf, this is a new upstream version that is binary compatible with
> >> the old one. qpdf is isolated in the dependency tree (n
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:27:13 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>> For qpdf, this is a new upstream version that is binary compatible with
>> the old one. qpdf is isolated in the dependency tree (no other packages
>> depend on it), and I am upstream, so I can definitely v
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:27:13 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> I'd like to request two freeze exceptions: qpdf 2.2.0-1 and tiff
> 3.9.4-3.
>
> For tiff, there are no code changes from 3.9.4-2. I just fixed up
> requires, conflicts, etc., to bring it up to standards 3.9.1.
I'd like to request two freeze exceptions: qpdf 2.2.0-1 and tiff
3.9.4-3.
For tiff, there are no code changes from 3.9.4-2. I just fixed up
requires, conflicts, etc., to bring it up to standards 3.9.1. (I didn't
want to combine that with the security fix that was in 3.9.4-2 and wa
Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi,
> I'm not sure I understand that bug, how you're planning on fixing it, or
> why you need to use setfacl instead of udev-acl as many other devices
> nodes already do.
udev-acl is meant for ConsoleKit integration and doesn't do anything for
you if you don't use ConsoleK
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:40:05 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have plans to make at least one final upload of sane-backends for
> Squeeze, to fix #588300. The patch has already been tested in
> experimental (as the bug log shows) and I'm just waiting for #590240 to
> be fixed before I
Hi,
I have plans to make at least one final upload of sane-backends for
Squeeze, to fix #588300. The patch has already been tested in
experimental (as the bug log shows) and I'm just waiting for #590240 to
be fixed before I can upload this to unstable (only this patch, not the
full experimental ve
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I would like to ask for some more freeze exceptions, 2 easy ones and one
> a bit more interesting:
>
> The easy ones:
> texlive-doc (2007.dfsg.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * blacklist wp-conv, nosell license (C
Dear Release Team,
I would like to ask for some more freeze exceptions, 2 easy ones and one
a bit more interesting:
The easy ones:
texlive-doc (2007.dfsg.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* blacklist wp-conv, nosell license (Closes
On So, 28 Dez 2008, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Unblocked by Luk.
Thanks, as usual.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer Debian TeX Gr
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:51:08AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> And another ...
>
> The following happened from .dfsg.12 to .dfsg.13:
>
Unblocked by Luk.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt
And another ...
The following happened from .dfsg.12 to .dfsg.13:
blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs) fax
which is nonfree (closes RC #509766).
Please unblock. Thanks.
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert P
Norbert Preining wrote:
> And another ...
>
> The following happened from .dfsg.11 to .dfsg.12:
>
> blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs) umrand
> which is nonfree (closes RC #508890). Furthermore a ${misc:Depends} has
> been added to the depends to make lintian happy.
>
>
And another ...
The following happened from .dfsg.11 to .dfsg.12:
blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs) umrand
which is nonfree (closes RC #508890). Furthermore a ${misc:Depends} has
been added to the depends to make lintian happy.
Please unblock. Thanks.
Best wishes
Nor
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> already migrated by now
Thanks, but mind one more RC bug is pending, but I haven't submitted it
by now. I have to remove another part, but I am quasi offline till
wednesday. Can you wait for that with releasing lenny ? ;-)))
Should be uploaded by Friday ...
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I guess you know the game, more license clean ups occurred in TeX Live:
>
> The following happened from .dfsg.10 to .dfsg.11:
>
> blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs):
> - yi4latex (closes RC #507009)
> - colortab (closes RC #507768
Hi all,
I guess you know the game, more license clean ups occurred in TeX Live:
The following happened from .dfsg.10 to .dfsg.11:
blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs):
- yi4latex (closes RC #507009)
- colortab (closes RC #507768)
In addition we finally managed to get a
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I guess you know the game, more license clean ups occurred in TeX Live:
>
> The following happened from .dfsg.9 to .dfsg.10:
>
> blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs):
> - cellular
> - cmastro
> - china2e
>
> OTOH, I reinstantiated
On Di, 25 Nov 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> already unblocked
As usual, thanks a lot.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all,
I guess you know the game, more license clean ups occurred in TeX Live:
The following happened from .dfsg.9 to .dfsg.10:
blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs):
- cellular
- cmastro
- china2e
OTOH, I reinstantiated calligra which got its license clean up, and ad
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to ask again for freeze exceptions for texlive-extra, which
> is another cleanup release due to licensing checks done by Robin
> Fairbairns (CTAN Team). In this course I re-added a file (tkalender.sty)
> that was removed i
Hi all,
I would like to ask again for freeze exceptions for texlive-extra, which
is another cleanup release due to licensing checks done by Robin
Fairbairns (CTAN Team). In this course I re-added a file (tkalender.sty)
that was removed in -8 after Robin's decision to tag it non-free, and
On Mo, 10 Nov 2008, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:33:36AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > I would like to ask for a freeze exception of
> > tex-common 1.11.3
> >
>
> Unblocked.
Thanks. Next one is coming in in a minute.
Best wishes
Norbert
-
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:33:36AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I would like to ask for a freeze exception of
> tex-common 1.11.3
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon
Dear Release Team,
I would like to ask for a freeze exception of
tex-common 1.11.3
This release contains two changes, on translation update (sv.po) and a
fix for a coding error in the POD documentation of dh_installtex
(missing =back). No other changes done.
The changelog:
tex-common (
On Mi, 29 Okt 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > texlive-extra (2007.dfsg.8-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> Unblocked.
Seems already unblocked by luk.
> > texlive-bin (2007.dfsg.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> Unblocked.
Thanks.
Best wishe
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> texlive-extra (2007.dfsg.8-1) unstable; urgency=medium
Unblocked.
> texlive-bin (2007.dfsg.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
Unblocked.
Thanks for your work.
Marc
--
BOFH #217:
The MGs ran out of gas.
pgpB3pZzhI7yc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
I would like to ask again for freeze exceptions for texlive-extra and
for texlive-bin.
On Do, 23 Okt 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> I'd rather have the uploads happen not much after the issues are
> discovered (say, a couple weeks), in order to have the package
> releaseabl
* Randall Donald [Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:20:46 -0700]:
> Dear release managers,
> 1) Please unblock nvidia-xconfig
> nvidia-xconfig 1.0+20080522-2 fixes a RC bug on a missing dependency.
Unblocked.
> 2) Has the kernel for Lenny been settled yet? I see the latest migration
> was on the 21st. If s
Dear release managers,
1) Please unblock nvidia-xconfig
nvidia-xconfig 1.0+20080522-2 fixes a RC bug on a missing dependency.
2) Has the kernel for Lenny been settled yet? I see the latest migration
was on the 21st. If so, I'd like to request that
nvidia-graphics-drivers, nvidia-graphics-
Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> util-vserver:
Unblocked by luk.
> backupninja
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #232:
Ionisation from the air-conditioning
pgpL54eHjSrz2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello release team,
I'm requesting hints to be added for the following two packages which
fix RC bugs:
util-vserver: added a versioned dependency on util-linux due to the fact
that the ionice binary was moved into this package and without this
dependency util-vserver can break mid-upgrade result
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > am Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:24:02AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > > Looks like debbugs (or britney?) is broken, bug#211765 doesn't get
> > > properly ignored. Can I get a force in addition to the unbl
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Philipp Kern wrote:
> am Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:24:02AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > Looks like debbugs (or britney?) is broken, bug#211765 doesn't get
> > properly ignored. Can I get a force in addition to the unblock?
>
> well, the bug is in BugsV for unstable.
Julien,
am Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:24:02AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 14:32:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > * xorg-server/2:1.4.2-6
> > two fixes for the xevie extension, plus one crasher for XFree86-VidMode
> > (all included upstream in 1.5.0)
> Looks like
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 14:32:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> * xorg-server/2:1.4.2-6
> two fixes for the xevie extension, plus one crasher for XFree86-VidMode
> (all included upstream in 1.5.0)
>
Looks like debbugs (or britney?) is broken, bug#211765 doesn't get
properly ignored. Can I get a
* Michael Schutte [Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:32:42 +0200]:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Probably the best idea, unless my hand-built (and partly buggy) ruby19
> > binaries on http://gsyprf10.external.hp.com/~deller/ruby/ may help (see my
> > other mail on the deb
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> Probably the best idea, unless my hand-built (and partly buggy) ruby19
> binaries on http://gsyprf10.external.hp.com/~deller/ruby/ may help (see my
> other mail on the debian-hppa list).
May I politely ask you to consider the libdb-
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:34:17PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
>>> I just looked into ruby19 on hppa.
>>> The makecontext()/setcontext()/switchcontext() functions which went into
>>> lib
dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
I just looked into ruby19 on hppa.
The makecontext()/setcontext()/switchcontext() functions which went into
libc-ports recently [*2] will not help here.
Instead, I think only when at some poi
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:27:06PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/08/08 at 16:34 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > libdb-ruby given back, though note that it's not guarenteed to get built
> > > as
> > > keeping the buildd running is more important (ruby1.9 has some nasty
> > > issues)...
>
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
>> * Lucas Nussbaum [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:10:16 -0300]:
>>> ruby1.9 is broken on hppa: 1.9.0.1, that previously built fine (it's in
>>> the archive) exhibits the same problems as 1.9.0.2 and 1.9.0.3.
>>> I spent h
On 16/08/08 at 21:09 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Otoh, it's really commendable, and I mean it, that you decided to spend
> your time towards having it fixed, rather than just kill ruby1.9 on hppa
> as I suggested (which is, tbh, what I would've done in your position).
> It really sucks that no hp
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:10:56PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:14:01PM +, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > >hppa has certainly had trouble during this release cycle. However, it's
> > >been mostly reduced to a small set of packages, and since (a) i
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:14:01PM +, Helge Deller wrote:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >hppa has certainly had trouble during this release cycle. However, it's
> >been mostly reduced to a small set of packages, and since (a) it has not
> >been the kind of brekage that prevents the release team from
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:10:16 -0300]:
ruby1.9 is broken on hppa: 1.9.0.1, that previously built fine (it's in
the archive) exhibits the same problems as 1.9.0.2 and 1.9.0.3.
I spent hours trying to do the hppa porters' work by investigating the
ruby1.9 bui
* Lucas Nussbaum [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:10:16 -0300]:
> ruby1.9 is broken on hppa: 1.9.0.1, that previously built fine (it's in
> the archive) exhibits the same problems as 1.9.0.2 and 1.9.0.3.
> I spent hours trying to do the hppa porters' work by investigating the
> ruby1.9 build failure, with n
Hi,
On 16/08/08 at 17:35 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:02:01 +0200]:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 04:51:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > * Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:32 +0200]:
>
> > > > May I now ask you to force libdb-ruby into Lenny?
* Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:02:01 +0200]:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 04:51:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:32 +0200]:
> > > May I now ask you to force libdb-ruby into Lenny?
> > We need it built on hppa, so you'll have to ask somebody with
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 04:51:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:32 +0200]:
>
> > May I now ask you to force libdb-ruby into Lenny?
>
> We need it built on hppa, so you'll have to ask somebody with an hppa
> machine to build it for you... (Maybe Frank Lic
* Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:32 +0200]:
> May I now ask you to force libdb-ruby into Lenny?
We need it built on hppa, so you'll have to ask somebody with an hppa
machine to build it for you... (Maybe Frank Lichtenheld or Domenico
Andreoli.)
--
Adeodato Simó
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:13:29PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Schutte [Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:26:57 +0200]:
>
> > Okay, this is bad—it failed indeed. I’m having an eye on libdb-ruby’s
> > migration stats. When (if) it enters testing, I’ll come back to you
> > again.
>
> libdb-ruby wil
Matthias Klose wrote:
currently the -headless packages are not installable without having
the complete -jre packages installed on the system. the reason for
this is a dependency on the complete -jre packages in packages which
are dependencies of the -headless packages. The fix is to include an
al
currently the -headless packages are not installable without having
the complete -jre packages installed on the system. the reason for
this is a dependency on the complete -jre packages in packages which
are dependencies of the -headless packages. The fix is to include an
alternative dependency on
On 09/08/08 at 16:13 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Schutte [Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:26:57 +0200]:
>
> > Okay, this is bad—it failed indeed. I’m having an eye on libdb-ruby’s
> > migration stats. When (if) it enters testing, I’ll come back to you
> > again.
>
> libdb-ruby will never build
* Michael Schutte [Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:26:57 +0200]:
> Okay, this is bad—it failed indeed. I’m having an eye on libdb-ruby’s
> migration stats. When (if) it enters testing, I’ll come back to you
> again.
libdb-ruby will never build on the hppa buildds, so it'll never be a
candidate for migratio
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 12:03:25AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Michael Schutte wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> At the moment, three near-identical source packages called
>> libdb4.2-ruby, libdb4.3-ruby, and libdb4.4-ruby are in Lenny. A
>> replacement for them, libdb-ruby, is on its way there; this su
On 08/08/08 at 16:34 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > libdb-ruby given back, though note that it's not guarenteed to get built as
> > keeping the buildd running is more important (ruby1.9 has some nasty
> > issues)...
>
> I believe that most ruby packages have been disabling on the hppa
> buildds
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 12:03:25AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Michael Schutte wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>> At the moment, three near-identical source packages called
>> libdb4.2-ruby, libdb4.3-ruby, and libdb4.4-ruby are in Lenny. A
>> replacement for them, libdb-ruby, is on its way there; this sure
Michael Schutte wrote:
Hi everybody,
At the moment, three near-identical source packages called
libdb4.2-ruby, libdb4.3-ruby, and libdb4.4-ruby are in Lenny. A
replacement for them, libdb-ruby, is on its way there; this sure is an
unwanted situation. To clean up, I see two possibilities:
(1)
Hi everybody,
At the moment, three near-identical source packages called
libdb4.2-ruby, libdb4.3-ruby, and libdb4.4-ruby are in Lenny. A
replacement for them, libdb-ruby, is on its way there; this sure is an
unwanted situation. To clean up, I see two possibilities:
(1) Remove libdb4.[2-4]-ruby
* Ludovic Brenta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080426 14:28]:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Same thing about GCC; before making 4.3 the default on some
> > architectures I asked single members of the release team if regression
> > fixes and bug fixes were allowed after the freeze, which w
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Same thing about GCC; before making 4.3 the default on some
> architectures I asked single members of the release team if regression
> fixes and bug fixes were allowed after the freeze, which was not
> denied at this time. I don't plan to upload a new G
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Here's what I would like to suggest as acceptable for lenny (and thus
> > > 1.14.19):
> >
> > Freeze guidelines are not really up to discussion and I don't like that
> > maintainers of key packages send the signal that they don'
On Sunday 04 March 2007 11:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> $ debdiff u/udev/udev_0.105-*.dsc|diffstat
> debian/po/nb.po | 77
> ++
> debian/po/pt.po | 76 +
> udev-0.105/debian/changelog
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:20:48PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 03 March 2007 11:02, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Unblocked.
> Thanks for the previous set. There's one more:
> unblock udev/0.105-3
> This AIUI is the last update targeted at Etch with a translation update
> for Dutch
On Saturday 03 March 2007 11:02, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Unblocked.
Thanks for the previous set. There's one more:
unblock udev/0.105-3
This AIUI is the last update targeted at Etch with a translation update
for Dutch (i.e. essential ;-) and one fix.
This package should migrate before D
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please consider the following packages for Etch:
> - module-init-tools (3.3-pre4-2)
> The only change should be some added aliases: net-pf-16-proto-*
Unblocked.
> - tcp-wrappers 7.6.dbs-13
> Single translation update
Unblocked.
> - openbsd-inetd (0.20
As a proxy for Marco...
Please consider the following packages for Etch:
- module-init-tools (3.3-pre4-2)
The only change should be some added aliases: net-pf-16-proto-*
- tcp-wrappers 7.6.dbs-13
Single translation update
- openbsd-inetd (0.20050402-5)
Single important bugfix affecting upgra
re than 10 days, and some of them even more than 20 days.
>
> Please allow freeze exceptions for the following packages:
>
> # mapserver (from 4.10.0-4 to 4.10.0-5)
Unblocked
> # phpldapadmin (from 0.9.8.3-7 to 0.9.8.3-8)
Unblocked
> # psycopg2 (from 2.0.5.1-5 to 2.0.5.1-6)
days.
Please allow freeze exceptions for the following packages:
# mapserver (from 4.10.0-4 to 4.10.0-5)
# * debian/po/de.po: added, thanks to Alwin Meschede. (Closes: #405727)
unblock mapserver/4.10.0-5
# phpldapadmin (from 0.9.8.3-7 to 0.9.8.3-8)
# * Applied upstream patch to fix vCard exports
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> Dear RMs,
> please allow the migration of the following packages to testing. Both
> contains documentation fixes and non-invasive changes for important issues
> (eg. argument parsing on powerpc for dovecot).
Both unblocked.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.
Dear RMs,
please allow the migration of the following packages to testing. Both
contains documentation fixes and non-invasive changes for important issues
(eg. argument parsing on powerpc for dovecot).
unblock dovecot/1.0.rc15-2
unblock python-xml/0.8.4-6
These are the the changelogs:
doveco
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 00:43 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:17:24AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > > * babel: closes FTBFS bugs on arches where it works and adds a new
> > > > package; if accepted, I'll upload 0.10.2-2 specifying build only
> > > >
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
