On 09/08/08 at 16:13 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Michael Schutte [Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:26:57 +0200]: > > > Okay, this is bad—it failed indeed. I’m having an eye on libdb-ruby’s > > migration stats. When (if) it enters testing, I’ll come back to you > > again. > > libdb-ruby will never build on the hppa buildds, so it'll never be a > candidate for migration unless somebody does a hand-build for hppa. > > I'm explicitly saying that, from a release team perspective (or my > perspective as a member of the release team), hand-builds for hppa for > packages that use /usr/bin/ruby1.9 are ok, because prior to releasing > Lenny either ruby1.9/hppa is getting fixed on the buildds, or we're > killing ruby1.9 on hppa. (Preferably the first, of course.)
An hppa porter still has to show me that there's something broken in ruby1.9/hppa (as opposed to a kernel problem on hppa triggered by the ruby1.9 build). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
