binNMUs for some recent maintainer uploads that were built against
netcdf preating the source package split:
(adding i386 for ma:same packages)
nmu ferret-vis_6.9.3-3 . amd64 . "Rebuild against the split netcdf sources."
nmu magics++_2.24.7-7 . amd64 i386 . "Rebuild against the split netcdf source
On 25-08-15 15:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> For the netcdf-c transition only the following packages still need
> rebuild in unstable:
>
> [...]
> python-scientific (2.9.4-3)
The build failures caused by the incompatibility with NumPy >= 1.9 are a
known issue upstream:
https://bitbucket.o
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30:43 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> gri (2.12.23-9) doesn't need any binNMU for netcdf anymore as mentioned
> in my previous message, the new upload by the maintainer already built
> with the new netcdf packages on the buildds, only the maintainer build
> on i386
On 28-08-15 10:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:33:10 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
>> dx(1:4.4.4-7)
>> grace (1:5.1.25-1)
>> gri (2.12.23-9)
>> kst (2.0.3-4)[also needed for netcdf-cxx-legacy]
>> octave
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:33:10 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> dx(1:4.4.4-7)
> grace (1:5.1.25-1)
> gri (2.12.23-9)
> kst (2.0.3-4)[also needed for netcdf-cxx-legacy]
> octave-octcdf (1.1.8-1)
> python-scientific (2.9.4-
On 25-08-15 15:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> For the netcdf-c transition only the following packages still need
> rebuild in unstable:
>
> dx(1:4.4.4-7)
> gnudatalanguage (0.9.5-2)[BD-Uninstallable]
> grace (1:5.1.25-1)
> gri (2.12.23-9)
>
On 20-08-15 00:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 19-08-15 20:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=netcdf-split-c-f-cxx;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
> We mostly need BinNMUs for the other packages in dependency level 1 now.
> This includes
On 19-08-15 22:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 18:34:03 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> The automatically created auto-netcdf tracker is not sufficient to track
>> the new C++ & Fortran packages. I've attached the ben configuration I
>> used for my pkg-grass-transitions t
On 20-08-15 00:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 19-08-15 20:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Everything except vtk from dependency level 1 in the netcdf transition
> has been NMUed to DELAYED/2:
>
> #793885 minc (2.2.00-6.1)
The minc NMU has been cancelled on request of the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 00:11:07 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> We mostly need BinNMUs for the other packages in dependency level 1 now.
> This includes gdal which has it's own upcoming transition #756867, I'd
> like to start that transition soon.
>
Alright, go ahead.
Cheers,
Julien
sig
On 19-08-15 20:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> We still need the updated transition tracker, but in the mean time my
> (manually updated) test tracker can be used:
>
> http://linuxminded.nl/tmp/pkg-grass-transitions/html/netcdf.html
>
> I'll NMU to DELAYED/2 all packages with patches for outst
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 18:34:03 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The automatically created auto-netcdf tracker is not sufficient to track
> the new C++ & Fortran packages. I've attached the ben configuration I
> used for my pkg-grass-transitions tracker in the preparation of this
> transitio
On 01-08-15 03:09, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 30-07-15 18:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=netcdf-split-c-f-cxx;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
> With the recent updates to the netcdf packages in experimental we should
> be ready for
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 03:09:54 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> To not require the build dependency changes for the netcdf-cxx-legacy
> and netcdf-fortran -dev packages, we should consider having
> libnetcdf-dev recommend the language specific -dev packages.
Recommends are not going to
Control: tags -1 patch
On 30-07-15 18:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=netcdf-split-c-f-cxx;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
> We're still not quite ready for the netcdf transition, but I'd like to
> formally request the transition already a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #791215 [release.debian.org] netcdf: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
Added tag(s) patch.
--
791215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was sebas...@xs4all.nl).
> usertag 791215 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> block 791215 by 790756
Bug #7912
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 791215 + transition
block 791215 by 790756
reassign 791215 release.debian.org
block 791215 by 793823 793877 793885 793920 793976 794010
block 791215 by 794027 794040 793891 793902 793882
thanks
On 25-07-15 13:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On
18 matches
Mail list logo
