est trop important :"
-#: ../debdelta:4582 ../debdelta:4584
+#: ../debdelta:4975
+msgid "Delta missing, server failed to create it:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#: ../debdelta:4981 ../debdelta:4983
msgid "Delta is not present:"
msgstr "Le delta est absent :"
Dear Niels,
I attach the debdiff where I fixed the problems you noted, and bug
708022 as well
If you say it's OK, I will upload it.
thanks. a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Niels,
thanks a lot for the review!
may I add also this patch attached, would close bug 708022, it seems it
was but a typo
a.
From d32a369499427c0f69a451adb1834a4450f001dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: A Mennucc
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:45:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] rename mismatched
bdelta:4582 ../debdelta:4584
+#: ../debdelta:4975
+msgid "Delta missing, server failed to create it:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#: ../debdelta:4981 ../debdelta:4983
msgid "Delta is not present:"
msgstr "Le delta est absent :"
-#: ../debdelta:4594
+#: ../debdelta:4993
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release team,
I uploaded a new version of debdelta ; unfortunately (my fault)
I did not realize that this time the freeze policy is so tight.
Please unblock package debdelta, or let u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
Dear release team,
in the version of 'debdelta' in squeeze, the PGP keys are too old,
so 'debdelta-upgrade' was useless; this new version contains new keys;
moreover, the new server that build
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debdelta.
Sorry to bother again.
Carlos Mandela found two annoying bugs;
* not stripping the ':arch' part of package names in multiarch hosts
* not quoting the ':' i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debdelta.
It corrects a nasty bug that occours with many KDE packages: those
contain a broken symlink, and 'debdelta-upgrade' would consider them
damaged, and not upd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pygame
this fixes copyright and hence an RC bug
unblock pygame/1.9.1release+dfsg-7
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT pol
On 27/08/2012 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Whats up with:
>
> debdelta-0.50/po/fr.mo |binary
> debdelta-0.50/po/it.mo |binary
you mean, you are surprised to see .mo files in the source?
> I would expect these to be generated during build; have they been added
> by mistake?
>
nope
--- debdelta-0.49/po/it.po 2012-08-06 16:17:53.00000 +0200
+++ debdelta-0.50/po/it.po 2012-08-26 22:24:29.0 +0200
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
-# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
-# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
-# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE packag
time)5.2f sec, vitesse %(speed)4s/sec, %(name)s"
+
+#: ../debdelta:4395
+msgid "Not enough disk space to download:"
+msgstr "Pas assez d'espace disque pour télécharger :"
+
+#: ../debdelta:4420
+#, python-format
+msgid "Downloaded, time %(time)5.2fsec, speed %
sorry, you are right.
Currently testing has freevo/1.9.2b2-2 while unstable has
freevo/1.9.2b2-4 (I attach proper diffs) ;
upgrading is not needed to correct an RC bug in testing , as you
correctly stated ;
upgrading would fix these bugs:
* make sure the recordserver starts after dvbstreamer,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freevo
I just found out I overlooked a RC bug in freevo; I uploaded corrected
version 1.9.2b2-4 ; see attachments; please provide exception.
unblock freevo/1.9.2b2-
hi,
I just found out I overlooked a RC bug in freevo; I uploaded corrected
version 1.9.2b2-4 ; see attachments; please provide exception.
a.
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files of package freevo: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
thanks! to Adam. We will build pygame w/o portmidi on kfreebsd-*.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hi, related to the pygame problem [1] is another question:
will kfreebsd-* be a release architecture in wheezy?
If yes ->
then portmidi has a release critical bug in it, it should
be removed from testing [2], and at the same time pygame
should be built w/o it ;
if no->
then pygame may trans
Il 02/01/2012 10:57, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
> pygame 1.8.x is built on kfreebsd. pygame 1.9.x is not.
>
ah I see.
(Indeed pygame 1.9.x depends on portmidi, that currently does not build
on kfree-*
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=portmidi
)
But why does http://packages.qa.deb
Dear d-release
according to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=pygame
pygame cannot transition in testing because:
"Updating pygame makes 3 non-depending packages uninstallable on
kfreebsd-amd64: monsterz, python-pyepl, python-pykaraoke"
I looked into http://packages.debian.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear d-release,
in the current version 1.9.0-9 of freevo in testing I forgot a '-f' in
debian/rules, and so it FTBFS in a buildd; so I uploaded 1.9.0-10
I attached a debdiff
a.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear jcristau and d-release all,
the current version of freevo in testing is 1.9.0-7 ; it is affected by
RC bugs
#607921 "python-freevo: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny".
#606782 "freevo messes with /home"
Both bugs are solved by 1.9
hi,
may you please let the new version 1.9.0-5 of freevo in squeeze?
here is the changelog
* [INTL:da] Danish translation of the debconf templates freevo,
thanks to Joe Dalton (Closes: #588753).
* fix lintian warnings:
- depend on python-all , not python-all-dev
* update standards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi d-r, hi Marc,
I uploaded 0.7.3-2 into testing-proposed-updates.
May you let that in?
a.
ps: and sorry for the version mess last time
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ha scritto:
> A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> plea
hi,
may you let freevo 1.8.1-3; it fixes two nasty problems that may have
been "grave" (in that they prevent installing/running it for some
people). Changelog snippet:
* freevo does not work with python 2.3 ; set
XS-Python-Version: >= 2.4 accordingly.
Thanks Mark Whitis (Closes: 493
hi,
please consider kaa-metadata 0.7.4-2 for Lenny.
In attachment there is
debdiff -d ~/freevo/kaa/kaa-metadata_0.7.4-1.dsc \
~/freevo/svn-alioth/packages//kaa-metadata/build-area/kaa-metadata_0.7.4-2.dsc
I added a patch (from upstream SVN) that solves a nasty bug.
The bug in brief: when incomp
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:09:58PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> I must therefore suggest that at the very least, the first part of this
> bug is too severe to allow to continue on to yet another release. Despite
> the pain now, that it is better to solve this issue and avoid yet more
> pain dow
retitle 474947 "fix Dynamic MMaps error"
severity 474947 important
tag 474947 -unreproducible
thanks
hi bug, hi people, hi d-release
I did some study on bug 474947, that is grave/RC, and is posted against APT.
Since I was told that the APT team is understaffed, I decided to take
action myself.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
I casually found out that 'fuzzyocr' 2.3 , currently in
testing&unstable, is incompatible with spamassassin 3.2 ; that is, you
can install it , no errors whatsover , but it does nothing at all. I did
never notice since I am not receiving image-bas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
may you let freevo 1.8.1-2 ?
changelog
freevo (1.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* [INTL:es] Spanish debconf templates translation,
thanks to Ignacio Mondino (Closes: #489962)
* Suggest ttf-liberation | ttf-mscorefonts-installer
thank
hi
Short explanation. 'debdelta-upgrade' uses the installed files of
packages, and patches from a repository, to build new versions of debs
for upgrading. One requisite is then (obviously) that all local data
must be pristine; for this reason, it was not compatible with
'prelink'. That was an an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi release team,
please let mplayer 1.0~rc2-17 into testing ; it was uploaded shortly
(*) before the freeze was announced, so it should be granted the
"automatic freeze exception"; anyway here is the changelog with some
extra info
* fix bashism
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:11:09PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Note iceweasel 3.0, which is planned for Lenny, while it contains
> embedded copy of code, does *not* use it. Find another example.
sorry, my example comes from embedded-code-copies list in
secure-testing svn, if that is obsolete, I ap
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 04:24:18PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Since mplayer includes an exact copy of ffmpeg by using an 'svn:external'
> on the ffmpeg svn, it makes sense to build shared library packages out
> of that source.
hi Reinhard,
I did build such a package ~1 month ago; the pack
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:30:33PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> I also find it fairly rich that you complain at a lack of answers, and
> yet don't reply to pings to a BR asking for an update.
The reason I did not reply is that I was working to find a
solution to the bug, but I did not find it.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Neither, it's the RC policy which carries more weight than a RG:
> http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt
>
> 5a) Packages in the archive must not be so buggy or out of date that we
> refuse to support them.
>
> The security
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:10:21AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> And that was the case since 16 Dec 2006?
yes. Read ahead.
> Why was this not brought up
> sooner, and why has there been zero effort made into resolving this
hi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:28:27PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> I'm afraid I can't accede to your request. This bug has been open since
> 25 Oct 2006. The etch-ignore tag was added 16 Dec 2006, where it was
> explicitly stated that it's RC for lenny. I pinged the bug on 28 Mar
> 2008, to agai
hi everybody
I am requesting to the d-release team a lenny-ignore tag for bug 395252.
There are multiple reasons for this request, please take some time to
read ahead.
--- Reason 1 : policy
Recently, after a long discussion in bug 392362, a paragraph [4.13]
was added to d-policy 3.8.0 stating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A Mennucc ha scritto:
> I checked a few minutes ago that 'arm' is still using gcc-4.3_4.3.0-3
>
> so it may be a bit early to binNMU
the arm bbuildd just finished compiling gcc-4.3 4.3.0-4
a.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette ha scritto:
> Le lundi 05 mai 2008 à 15:12 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>> On Mon, 05 May 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>> Why is it a problem?
>> Package: libffi4-dev
>> Source: gcc-4.3
>> Version: 4.3.0-3
>> Provides: libffi-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A Mennucc ha scritto:
> I checked a few minutes ago that 'arm' is still using gcc-4.3_4.3.0-3
and m68k as well
a.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raphael Hertzog ha scritto:
> On Mon, 05 May 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le lundi 05 mai 2008 à 13:57 +0200, A Mennucc a écrit :
>>> I checked a few minutes ago that 'arm' is still using gcc-4.3_4.3.0-3
>>>
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I checked a few minutes ago that 'arm' is still using gcc-4.3_4.3.0-3
so it may be a bit early to binNMU
a.
ps: I am tracking this issue since I need that 'mplayer' be binNMU'd ...
but only after I am sure all bbuildd's are using gcc-4.3_4.3.0-4 !
may you please binNMU waili ? it failed on sparc because of a missing
dependency, see
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=waili&ver=19990723-18
thanks
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi ,
the web page http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0.html reports:
> Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact
> debian-release if update is needed)
and also
> Unblock request by luk ignored due to version mismatch: 2.12.0-2
I got cu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ha scritto:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:04:51PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> I think I already pointed people interested in this to #268658.
> If ftpmasters where given the tools to implement this seamlessly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
> In an attempt to prevent drift to a well-known counter argument:
> DEBIAN/md5sums (used by debsums) are *not* intended as a mean to counter
> security attacks, since they can be easily altered.
If md5sums become part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
just for the record : "debdelta" uses md5sums (when available) as a way
to speed up delta creation, to rapidly detect if there are any identical
files in the archives. So , yes, I (*) would be happy if md5sums where
always available.
BTW, I also
hi
I prepared a new version of MPlayer 1.0~rc1-12etch ; I uploaded it into
t-p-u ; please condider for unblocking
An important note: ignore anything in debian/patches in the attached
interdiff: those files are there for documentation
and future reference, but are not automatically applied or r
Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> If you have time to prepare an upload for testing-proposed-updates including
> only the changes that fit the freeze policy, I'll happily accept that.
> Otherwise, the security fix will need to go through the security team.
:-) you lost a good chance of having a patch
hi
I prepared a new version of MPlayer 1.0~rc1-13 ;
here is the discussion of the changelog;
item are in decreasing order of importance
I also divided the changes in two families:
* typical sid -> etch stuff (RC bugs, "it crashes" bugs, I18N)
* other stuff
* changelog
** typical
hi
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 06:22:57PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >2) Also , I added in debian/patches all patches that I applied or I am
> >working on
>
> How can I see which patches get applied and which don't? It would be
> better if you remove the patches that don't get applied...
Let me cla
hi
In the previous email I forgot some facts :->
1) I added a small patch from upstream in stream/cache2.c
this fixes bug in caching streams in gmplayer (Closes: #396962)
due to the fact that forked processes cannot use a GTK gui;
2) Also , I added in debian/patches all patches that I a
hi
I prepared a new version of MPlayer ; here is the discussion of the changelog;
item are in decreasing order of importance
* (possible) security fixes backported from SVN
7585 7586 7591 for libavcodec/h264.c
7640 7650 for libavformat/asf.c
all than
Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 02:11:36PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
>> I uploaded gpr 0.11deb.etch1 in t-p-u
>
>> please let it into Etch; but, feel free to ask questions
>
> Hmm, I never said 'no' to the version that you had already upload
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ha scritto:
> It's -update*s*.
:->
I was thinking about an exoteric explanation,
kinda I had uploaded into the wrong queue ...
:->
---
thanks Marc and Max :-)
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hi
(CC: to d-mentors : I need some help here)
Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> I think in conclusion I would prefer t-p-u for this.
I tried it ;
I uploaded a package (using dput) ;
the first line in debian/changelog was
gpr (0.11deb.etch1) testing-proposed-update; urgency=low
but I got this er
I uploaded gpr 0.11deb.etch1 in t-p-u
please let it into Etch; but, feel free to ask questions
a.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi
here attached is the diff for gpr 0.11deb.etch1 ; note that the
changelog is much more detailed; here it is with further comments (and
answers to some Steve's questions)
> * avoid storing twice the configuration
(this was explained in original email)
> * do not use uninitialized GError stuf
hi again
Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:26:55PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
>
> Why does this version drop support in revalidate_utf8 for converting
> locale-encoded strings to utf8?
:-) that falls in "unused code cleanup"
hi
summary: I uploaded gpr 0.12deb in unstable; it fixes a nasty bug that
had gone unnoticed, and that was rendering gpr practically useless;
unfortunately, while tracking down that bug, the code changed more than
strictly needed. What to do? Would you let gpr 0.12deb in Etch? Or, may
I upload a g
hi,
the version 0.3.7-1 of flpsed in Etch is in bad shape; it is almost
unusable, due to these issues:
- it needs a "gs" as a backend, but there is no Depends
(see bug 402451)
- it does not work with gs-gpl, but only with "gs-esp"
(see again bug 402451)
IMHO the above render the package not re
hi
please consider letting fuzzyocr into Etch
it is a spamassassin plugin to check image attachments
the current version is fuzzyocr 2.3-b2
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hi
I NMUd xarchon 0.50-10.1
the new version fixes the bug
111342: Missing font prevents starting new game
This bug was posted in 2001 as 'grave' but was then downgraded as
'normal' by the mantainer (who claimed that 'xarchon' would work with "a
sane choice of fonts" installed in the system). I
hi release people
it seems that MPlayer is vulnerable as well to the
problem DSA 1244-1
I adapted the patch that was used on libxine1 ;
I applied it and uploaded in unstable;
I also asked to MPlayer people, it seems my patch is OK
please hint it into etch
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
, Wookey wrote:
> On 2006-12-23 22:26 +, Wookey wrote:
> > On 2006-12-23 11:28 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> > > hi everybody
> > I have started a build on hedges and can do a binNMU, but I think it will be
> > rejected too as only official builds are currently being a
ng soul in d-arm can build and upload it,
- or explain me how to do it (I tried to log in 'agnesi', but it would
not let me do that; I can log in 'leisner', but I see no way to build
mplayer inside it).
thanks in advance to anyone who would help
a.
ps: whatever you choose to do,
hi everybody
the ARM version of mplayer_1.0~rc1-10 never entered into the archives, because
of
this error following
what is the correct thing to do now?
can someone reupload it with a correct signature?
I dont think this needs a binNMU... the build did not fail,
it is just that the signature fa
[this was meant for d-release (damn autocompletion)]
Moritz Muehlenhoff ha scritto:
> A Mennucc wrote:
>> Brief summary of bug: MPlayer contains an embedded copy of FFmpeg
>> (indeed, they are developed by ~the same people); Aur=E9lien G=C9R=D4ME a=
>> nd
>> Mori
hi everybody
MPlayer did never enter into etch due to bug 395252.
Brief summary of bug: MPlayer contains an embedded copy of FFmpeg
(indeed, they are developed by ~the same people); Aurélien GÉRÔME and
Moritz Muehlenhoff ask that the mplayer package be dynamically linked to
the libraries in the
how come that mplayer-blue transitioned into testing ? it depends on
mplayer, and mplayer is not in testing.
a.
--- Begin Message ---
FYI: The status of the mplayer-blue source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.6-1
--
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:17:42AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Andrea Mennucci
> > 354650 lightspeed: segfault at start up on amd64
I converted it to GTK2; the bug submitter says that the new version
is fine, so I
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Andrea Mennucci
> 354650 lightspeed: segfault at start up on amd64
I converted it to GTK2, and uploaded it to experimental, as version
1.2a-3 ; if anybody has a AMD64 machine on the desktop, please test
it. In 1.2a-3 there is a bug
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:19:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> You might want to check that you set valid From: headers in your mails. :)
I do not know how it got wrong... anyway I have other debugging to be done
> > > 354650 lightspeed: segfault at start up on amd64
>
> > s
please hint so that
xmorph and waili will go into testing
thanks
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
"Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef"
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:12:15AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Looks like its entire chain is ready, so now you need a "hint". Ask
> debian-release to do this:
the page on excuses was speaking of an "hint"...
what is it ?
choice 1) a plain english email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
choice 2) a proc
hi
I hereby propose gpr 0.9deb-4sarge
for inclusion in the next point release of stable
Reason:
gpr can install a wrapper in place of the command lpr (by using a
diversion). The wrapper will
call the real lpr command if: either it is called from a terminal, or
there is no access to an X DISPLAY;
maybe this problem may be mentioned in the Sarge release notes ?
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:46:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> > any suggestions?
>
> I don't see any reason to worry about it; I think it w
hi
I am sending this mail to many recipients since I need help
-
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Package: lpr-ppd
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But
> a
dear release people,
I have found a stupid bug in my package gtkmorph: when displaying a
warning, the string is free'd twice, and the program crashes. This
happens seldom, so I did not note this before.
I have uploaded xmorph 20050408b that was happily compiled bu buildds.
The change to the sourc
hi
I just uploaded zope2.7 2.7.5-2 into unstable
this version fixes
bug 305854 a minor problem when running tests
bug 307687 bashism in /etc/init.d/zope2.7
it "doesn't contain extraneous changes", so I uploaded to unstable;
this version 2.7.5-2 has been tested and it works fine;
unfortunatel
81 matches
Mail list logo
