openssl098 is still kept in testing by:
- ace (ICE on armel)
Taking a look at this one
- beid (RC-buggy, candidate for removal)
- ipsec-tools (#619687 #643570, has reverse dependencies)
- isakmpd (#622051, candidate for removal)
This bug has had a patch for several months, but the maintainer has
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 23:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/10/6 Julien Cristau :
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> >> Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
> >> kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
> >> veri
Tanguy Ortolo, 2011-10-07 09:48 UTC+0200:
> Thijs Kinkhorst, 2011-10-07 09:14 UTC+0200:
> > Are you sure everything went OK? Nothing to see on security-master.
>
> Strange, I am sure that it uploaded fine, and I got no REJECT message. I
> shall publish the package to my server this evening and let
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 644177 binNMU: lush 1.2.1-9+cvs20110227
Bug #644177 [release.debian.org] "binNMU: lush 1.2.1-9+cvs20110227"
Changed Bug title to 'binNMU: lush 1.2.1-9+cvs20110227' from '"binNMU: lush
1.2.1-9+cvs20110227"'
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 644175 binNMU: mutrace 0.2.0-1+b4
Bug #644175 [release.debian.org] "binNMU: mutrace 0.2.0-1+b4:
Changed Bug title to 'binNMU: mutrace 0.2.0-1+b4' from '"binNMU: mutrace
0.2.0-1+b4:'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 644175 normal
Bug #644175 [mutrace] mutrace: not installable in sid
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle 644175 "binNMU: mutrace 0.2.0-1+b4:
Bug #644175 [mutrace] mutrace: not installable in sid
Changed Bug title to '"binNMU
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 644498 release.debian.org
Bug #644498 [nitpic] binNMU: nitpic 0.1-12
Bug reassigned from package 'nitpic' to 'release.debian.org'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions nitpic/0.1-12.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20110106.squeeze3.b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rcaxr-xs.
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 09:02:31PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> I'm not in a mood for this kind of "discussion". I can only reiterate
> that there is nothing I can do. Packages built after openssl 1.0.0 had
> become the standard are fine and I have no control over older binary
Yes.
> packages t
I'm not in a mood for this kind of "discussion". I can only reiterate
that there is nothing I can do. Packages built after openssl 1.0.0 had
become the standard are fine and I have no control over older binary
packages that are already released.
>> I can only repeat that there is nothing inherent
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 05:17:13PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> FWIW, http://packages.debian.org/sid/ipppd lists libssl0.9.8 for alpha,
> armhf, hppa, m68k, sh4 and libssl1.0.0 for the rest. I checked the
> other binary packages as well.
Totally irrelevant.
sid != testing.
http://packages.debi
Adam,
thank you for your comment.
FWIW, http://packages.debian.org/sid/ipppd lists libssl0.9.8 for alpha,
armhf, hppa, m68k, sh4 and libssl1.0.0 for the rest. I checked the
other binary packages as well.
I can only repeat that there is nothing inherently in isdnutils to force
dependency on libs
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:48:07 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
I believe isdnutils is a
false positive in your list. All packages in testing depend on 1.0.0
of the openssl packages. The arches where isdnutils-derived packages
still depend on 0.9.8 either have outdated isdnutils and/or openssl
packages
Processing changes file: kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze3.1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386_0.6.1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
On 07.10.2011 02:46, Julien Cristau wrote:
openssl098 is still kept in testing by:
[...]
- isdnutils (#618228, has reverse dependencies)
Julien,
thank you for the heads up. I maintain (to the best of my limited
abilities) the isdnutils package in D
Thijs Kinkhorst, 2011-10-07 09:14 UTC+0200:
> Are you sure everything went OK? Nothing to see on security-master.
Strange, I am sure that it uploaded fine, and I got no REJECT message. I
shall publish the package to my server this evening and let you know.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo
| `-'
On Do, Okt 06, 2011 at 21:08:10 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Do, Okt 06, 2011 at 18:48:51 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 15:34:08 +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote:
>>
>>> [I'm not subscribed; please, Cc me in case of reply]
>>>
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> With new upstream
On Thu, October 6, 2011 21:21, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst, 2011-10-06 14:34 UTC+0200:
>> OK. Tanguy, if you update your target distribution to oldstable-security
>> and upload to security-master, we can release it.
>
> Thank you Philipp, I have just done so.
Are you sure everything wen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 642956 + pending
Bug #642956 [release.debian.org] pu: package apache2/2.2.16-6+squeeze4
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
642956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
19 matches
Mail list logo
