On 07.10.2011 02:46, Julien Cristau wrote:
openssl098 is still kept in testing by: Julien, thank you for the heads up. I maintain (to the best of my limited abilities) the isdnutils package in Debian. I believe isdnutils is a false positive in your list. All packages in testing depend on 1.0.0 of the openssl packages. The arches where isdnutils-derived packages still depend on 0.9.8 either have outdated isdnutils and/or openssl packages. There's nothing inherently in isdnutils that should block the transition so there is nothing I can do, I believe. FWIW, there's also no blocker bug against isdnutils among the list in the BTS. FYI, RC bug 618228 which you list above has also finally been fixed this morning. I had been waiting for a sponsor for about 2 months or so on that one. Otavio was kind enough to help me out and upload my fix quickly after I asked him for support. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8eaeb7.5040...@rolf.leggewie.biz |
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Kurt Roeckx
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Julien Cristau
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Rolf Leggewie
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Adam D. Barratt
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Rolf Leggewie
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.... Rene Engelhard
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl ... Rolf Leggewie
- Bug#622134: transition: open... Rene Engelhard
- Bug#622134: transition: open... Otavio Salvador
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Andreas Noteng
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Julien Cristau
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Matthew Grant
- Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 Kurt Roeckx