On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 05:17:13PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > FWIW, http://packages.debian.org/sid/ipppd lists libssl0.9.8 for alpha, > armhf, hppa, m68k, sh4 and libssl1.0.0 for the rest. I checked the > other binary packages as well.
Totally irrelevant. sid != testing. http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/ipppd;: [...] # dep: libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8m-1) SSL shared libraries [...] Surprise! > I can only repeat that there is nothing inherently in isdnutils to force > dependency on libssl0.9.8. Grep through the source and packaging > information if you don't believe me. See above. Maybe you should look at the right packages and ACK that Adam meant *testing*. > To me it seems as if the packages that still depend on the old libssl > are simply outdated and were built at a time when 0.9.8 was the default. Yes, and? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111007114831.gc1...@rene-engelhard.de
