I'm not in a mood for this kind of "discussion". I can only reiterate that there is nothing I can do. Packages built after openssl 1.0.0 had become the standard are fine and I have no control over older binary packages that are already released.
>> I can only repeat that there is nothing inherently in isdnutils to force >> dependency on libssl0.9.8. Grep through the source and packaging >> information if you don't believe me. > > See above. Maybe you should look at the right packages and ACK that > Adam meant *testing*. There's nothing in isdnutils packaging or source in testing that would force a dependency on a specific version, either. Look at the testing-to-unstable debdiff or the testing source if you think I'm wrong. The only significant difference is the time the packages were built. If packages are stuck at older binaries built pre-openssl1.0.0 for certain arches that is nothing I have control over, either. You guys keep barking up the wrong tree. Send a patch against isdnutils if you disagree and can prove your point. If there is indeed something I can do to help fix the situation I'm more than willing to do that. But I think there simply isn't. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8ef867.5000...@rolf.leggewie.biz
