On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 01:30:42PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:20:42PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> > I prepared a policy for the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group, the document
> > can be found at http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/debian-kde-policy.html
>
> Hi,
>
>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:20:42PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> I prepared a policy for the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group, the document
> can be found at http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/debian-kde-policy.html
Hi,
Just a few clarififications:
1. About alioth: Will we have the entire kde
I was a bit scared reading about Chris Cheney orphaning his KDE packages
in the unreleased DWN and wnpp mailout... I'm glad to see that the group
discussed earlier was/is actually being created.
Now, some comments on
http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/debian-kde-policy.html
Reading paragraph 1(3),
> Infact, points 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7 were included not only for but
> especially for you -- you complained about "feeling unhappy with
> justifying all changes you do to others".
Sure. I like points 2.4 - 2.7. I'm simply asking how it's better than the
current system (which is working fine fo
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:39:48AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> I think the biggest inconvenience I forsee is with the BTS - I'd have to
> start keeping track of multiple maintainer email addresses, and it will
> be more difficult to track the bugs in the packages that I'm looking
> after amongst the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:39:48AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
> > whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed
> > in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let
> >
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:17:47AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
> > whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed
> > in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let
> >
> Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
> whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed
> in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let
> us know that too?
Further to my previous email: My second question
> Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
> whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed
> in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let
> us know that too?
Hmm, my first question is why we'd be using alioth
Hi folks,
I prepared a policy for the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group, the document
can be found at http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/debian-kde-policy.html
Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be
10 matches
Mail list logo
