> Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us > whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed > in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let > us know that too?
Further to my previous email: My second question is how the proposed development model (upload if you're the primary maintainer or have their blessing) differs from the current model (upload if you're the debian maintainer or NMU if you have their blessing)? I guess I'm specifically wondering what advantages the new system would have over the current system (which is more or less communal CVS commits, maintainer uploads). I think the biggest inconvenience I forsee is with the BTS - I'd have to start keeping track of multiple maintainer email addresses, and it will be more difficult to track the bugs in the packages that I'm looking after amongst the significant noise of kdelibs, kdebase, qt, etc. Ben. :)
