On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:20:42PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote: > I prepared a policy for the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group, the document > can be found at http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/debian-kde-policy.html
Hi, Just a few clarififications: 1. About alioth: Will we have the entire kde packages in alioth svn or just the debian/ dirs? I know we can't at the moment use pristine upstream tarballs, but having the entire source tree in our version managment feels like a HUGE waste of space, as we are supposed only to edit files under debian/ dirs.. 2. About commits to module, I think we should rewrite it as: - (5) Commits to a module may only be done if + (5) Commits to the TRUNK of a module may only be done if Creating a branch where to commit fixes and then letting primary maintainer to merge them to TRUNK if he finds them appropriate seems more intuitive than asking for permission for every commit. I'm refering TRUNK being here whatever we choose in svn to be the branch which next unstable upload will emarge from. Also, I think we should not be that strict for all commits. Strictly nonfunctional commits, like typofixes, better descriptions and documentation (Maybe even adding manpages) should be "fix at will". -- Riku Voipio | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | kirkkonummentie 33 | +358 40 8476974 --+-- 02140 Espoo | | dark> A bad analogy is like leaky screwdriver |
pgpopD8MwVu9M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
