On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:17:47AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: > > > Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us > > whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed > > in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let > > us know that too? > > Hmm, my first question is why we'd be using alioth when we already > have group work happening quite happily on cvs.kde.org. Or is there > some unhappiness with cvs.kde.org that i'm not aware of? > On alioth, we could control who gets access or who doesn't. When using KDE CVS, users who want access would have to bother KDE people. Additionally, not the base members of the group would be the ones who decide about who gets access and who doesn't, but the KDE CVS administrators. And keep in mind that having write access to KDE CVS means having access to all of the CVS. Giving a single person write access to all of KDE CVS just to be able to check in soemthing to -- let's say -- kdebase/debian is a security risk, at least for me.
Another reason might be that on alioth usage of SVN becomes possible. CVS pisses some people (me included) off badly and SVN appears to be a really good alternative. > b. -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'` http://www.madkiss.org/ people.debian.org/~madkiss/ `- Use Debian GNU/Linux 3.0! See http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
