On 2/4/25 06:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the src:wondershaper package:
>
> #1041584: Consider switching to wondershaper 1.4.1
>
> It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters .
>
> Their explanation is
Thanks for the review, Chris!
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 11:52:08PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> ISTM this is a lot of new, potentially fragile sh code, possibly
> with undefined semantics. Indeed shellcheck has a lot of things to
> say, including:
>
> | In prune-logs line 9:
> | set -o pipefa
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041584,
regarding Consider switching to wondershaper 1.4.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067658,
regarding Update source link to package recent software version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089931,
regarding wondershaper: does not work at all with newer Linux versions (CBQ net
scheduler)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #253385,
regarding wondershaper: more advanced, but complex, option parsing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #253790,
regarding wondershaper: use the HTB version of the Wondershaper, not the CBQ
version
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #253554,
regarding Please use something like /etc/default/wondershaper
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #303520,
regarding wondershaper: Please add a --dry-run option
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:25:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094954: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093528,
regarding nixnote2: Unmaintained upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #348715,
regarding wondershaper: [PATCH] Split default class into 5 based on packet size
and reduce child class rates to be inclusive
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #256754,
regarding wondershaper: Needs a benchmark>>autoconfigure script.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #256461,
regarding wondershaper: Option to limit range of rules?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #308070,
regarding Reenabling the NOPRIO* options of wondershaper. Some more informative
output.
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #461560,
regarding wondershaper: allow setting high priority ports also (ssh, ntp, etc.)
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #440274,
regarding wondershaper: limits incoming traffic although a higher value is set
on start
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #384536,
regarding wondershaper: add config scripts for /etc/network
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #616034,
regarding wondershaper: root CBQ bandwidth needs to be bigger
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #540988,
regarding wondershaper: add ppp/ip-*.d scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #253554,
regarding doesn't let you set the NOPRIOHOSTSRC etc variables without patching
the file in /sbin/wondershaper
to be marked as
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #795874,
regarding wondershaper: Hardcoded bandwidth limit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #651586,
regarding wondershaper: Prioritize DNS traffic
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #797050,
regarding wondershaper: Please add a NetworkManager script and instructions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #924011,
regarding wondershaper: README.Debian: Suggest using $IFACE in
/etc/network/interfaces reference
to be marked as done.
This
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
wondershaper |1.1a-12 | source, all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; unmaintained, and broken on kernel 6.3-rc1 and later
--
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006279,
regarding Please update to latest release 1.4.1 including configuration file
and systemd support
to be marked as done.
This
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
nixnote2 | 2.1.10+dfsg1-2 | source
nixnote2 | 2.1.10+dfsg1-2+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el,
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
--- Reason ---
Ro
Version: 2.1.10+dfsg1-2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package nixnote2 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/10949
Version: 1.1a-12+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package wondershaper has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1095040
Control: tags -1 patch
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 09:24:31PM +, Andrew Bower wrote:
> wtmpdb will rotate logs but nothing will prune them (like logrotate would for
> other types of log - unfortunately it doesn't fit in well with the wtmpdb
> way).
I have come up with a solution whereby a 'prune
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1094965 [wtmpdb] wtmpdb: provides no way to prune rotated logs
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1094965: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094965
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
* Andrew Bower [250203 23:39]:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 09:24:31PM +, Andrew Bower wrote:
> > wtmpdb will rotate logs but nothing will prune them (like logrotate would
> > for
> > other types of log - unfortunately it doesn't fit in well with the wtmpdb
> > way).
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 wtmpdb
Bug #1094921 [sysvinit-core] sysvinit-core: does not write entries to wtmpdb
Bug reassigned from package 'sysvinit-core' to 'wtmpdb'.
No longer marked as found in versions sysvinit/3.13-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1094921 to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 868752 - src:uwsgi
Bug #868752 [cdbs] cdbs: python helper finds python3.5 und python3.6 but no
runtime for python3.6
Removed indication that 868752 affects src:uwsgi
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1094943 + sid trixie
Bug #1094943 [dnsvi] dnsvi: not installable due to missing dnsutils
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1094942 + sid trixie
Bug #1094942 [dns-browse] dlint: not installable due to missing dnsutils
Added tag(s) sid and tr
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 07:30:31 +0100
Source: zc.buildout
Architecture: source
Version: 4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Alexand
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 07:15:53 +0100
Source: zope.hookable
Architecture: source
Version: 7.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Alexa
zope.hookable_7.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zope.hookable_7.0-1.dsc
zope.hookable_7.0.orig.tar.gz
zope.hookable_7.0-1.debian.tar.xz
zope.hookable_7.0-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debia
zc.buildout_4.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zc.buildout_4.0-1.dsc
zc.buildout_4.0.orig.tar.gz
zc.buildout_4.0-1.debian.tar.xz
zc.buildout_4.0-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 07:04:35 +0100
Source: zope.location
Architecture: source
Version: 5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Alexa
zope.location_5.1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zope.location_5.1-1.dsc
zope.location_5.1.orig.tar.gz
zope.location_5.1-1.debian.tar.xz
zope.location_5.1-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debia
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 09:05:59AM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> control: reassign -1 wtmpdb
>
> Andrew,
>
> This seems to be resolvable in wtmpdb, so I am reassigning.
https://salsa.debian.org/abower/wtmpdb/-/commit/bfcc651ba54f2edec3cb502968db21556d0cb47e
https://salsa
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1094921 [wtmpdb] sysvinit-core: does not write entries to wtmpdb
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1094921: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
43 matches
Mail list logo
