Package: gprolog
Version: 1.1.0-4
Severity: normal
Documentation (file /usr/share/doc/gprolog/html/manual069.html) references
website
"http://www.logic-programming.org/prolog_std.html";, which seems to have no DNS
entry.
Also MetaCrawler and Google were unable to find the new location of the
d
ty easily upgrade to 1.23.27, but that'd
take quite some resources off gluck that I didn't want to spend until
now because there wasn't a usable web interface anyway. Just send me a
mail and I'll fire off 1.23.27.
--Jeroen
[1] on merkel, run: "getent group qa"
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ldn't they be
updated to make use of linux-2.6? Removing tidev-modules now would break
those two packages.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
son.
Yeah, the move to 'dak ' is now completed also on merkel, so
'madison' is no more.
'rmadison' also shouldn't actually be called like that, it's a bit a
pity it was introduced while the name was already being reconsidered.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolf
; google hit on his name.
Can you please bounce (not forward) your outoing mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], if you still have it?
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
And also not for cc to the list or my personal mail address.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
your changes (but it might take a while to get processed).
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
e see Bug#NNN for details." or something
Please let me know if you prefer me to do these changes.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
se, I'd be happy to review your patch first (if time permits).
I'll come back later :)
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:39:39PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le mercredi 26 janvier 2005 ? 18:51 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a
> ?crit :
> > Hi Raphael,
> >
> > I'd like to have support for removal requests in the PTS. I think I can
> > technically add t
Opinions? If keeping it, it should at least get an QA upload setting
maintainer appropriately.
--Jeroen
- Forwarded message from Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 13:12:50 +0100
From: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Michlmayr <[
npp bugs are displayed in the
PTS (packages.qa.d.o), I think there is already a page where to see this
type of meta-package data, along with other stuff about a given package.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
es (in this context, being upload doesn't count).
If you _do_ maintain one package, it'll list (eventually, there is
currently some too long delay somewhere in ftp stuff) all your packages
and those you're uploader for.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:24:55PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'm hereby officially handing the MIA activities over to Jeroen van
> Wolffelaar. Jeroen has done a great job on MIA related activities in
> the past few months and has de facto been in charge for a while.
Thanks y
area in the PTS would help much.
Fixed, should show up for every package after the next PTS run, I've
manually forced a rebuild of the 'gkdial' PTS page as example.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
error output, is /dev/nulled, I guess the
clue why it doesn't work might be hidden in there :)
--Jeroen
[1] http://dehs.alioth.debian.org
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
ckage is currently being maintained by the Debian QA group.
If you want to adopt it, -mentors is indeed the right place, not -qa.
Good luck finding a sponsor!
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To
lease go ahead and submit those 6229 bugs.
NO!
Do *not* file 6229 bugs about the same subject. Never.
Adding a watchfile is up to the maintainer. It's a feature offered to
maintainers, they can use it if the wish. If a watchfile for a package
makes sense (for quite some packages it doesn&#
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:33:06PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> [removing pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}]
>
> On Saturday 12 March 2005 00.00, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > prefereably by first mailing this to the
> > wnpp bugs,
>
> Not clear what y
self of the
university is around that time. New acadamic year starts end of
august/beginning of september, and comes with a lot of busyness.
A month or so later would seem better.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadr
k the solution is to
run everything more or less hourly, and have a quick "Already
uptodate/archive sync in progress? exit!" in front. This way you also
cope with occasional long syncs, if dinstall starts running multiple
times a day, etc.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PRO
are not the maintainer? Or is it
> RM because the package is orphaned?
Yeah, "RM: enbd -- RoQA; RC buggy, upstream unreacheable" or something
would be better IMHO.
RoQA already implies orphaned then.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber &
what others thought first.
Please let the wnpp bug age for a bit (so, QA maintain). It's orphaned
for only a couple of weeks yet.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
ates
and stuff like that.
I suggest removing it. Please object soon if you disagree.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ould first try to ping and see what's up with those people having
shown interest.
It's being kept out of sarge via the two RC bugs, so there is no hurry.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To U
reassign 187128 ftp.debian.org
retitle 187128 RM: catalog -- RoM; RoQA; orphaned for two years, hardly used
thanks
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:14:11AM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2005 19:45, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> [...]
> > I suggest removing it. Please ob
ot a urgent issues as far as I'm concerned.
Are you interested in the package to take it over, or are you a user
wanting to have it improved, or ...?
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 03:33:06PM +0100, Tim Cutts wrote:
> I am hereby formally offering to adopt it.[am-utils]
>
> I imagine the QA team will want to nudge Philippe first, though...
Nudged.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN;
at the tail
(and since I make backups of /org/cvs.d.o, I could recover it despite
Joey removing it).
> /cvs/qa/data/wnpp/wnpp-lint,v
Ditto, recovered 1.19 - 1.32
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
-
ed it yet.
>
> Just wondering what peoples' thoughts are?
We're not in a hurry to get it removed, as long as it's kept out of
sarge (which it is now).
I suggest waiting, but it'd be nice if it'd be assured that upstream is
active if someone's going to save
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 12:39:42PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:32:43AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > What is the status? The above message is nearly two years old :)
>
> Jeroen, did you get any reply?
No
> If not, I think we should remove d
ing to touch this further for now, I hope someone else with
more insight in this part of DDPO could look into it. For now,
everything key-ish won't work in it.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSU
rge on tkchooser, of
course, provided the problem, which you don't mention, is indeed of
release critical nature.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
if you're not, query the maintainer about what's up.
Anyway, by notifying QA this will be looked into, it just might take a
bit of time.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
out breaking cl-reversi-clim.
What to do? You did not orphan cl-reversi-clim, so I assume you want to
keep maintaining it. Its build-dependency is unmaintained though.
Please let me hear your thoughts about this.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:46:51AM -0600, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > What to do? You did not orphan cl-reversi-clim, so I assume you want to
> > keep maintaining it. Its build-dependency is unmaintained though.
>
> cl-reversi-clim is a binary
ing. After confirmation,
you'll be subscribed to that pseudo-package's bug reports just as if
with a real package.
Of course it's a minor bug that this warning is given (and that it's not
*that* clear it's a warning and not an error). Therefore I've cc'd
[EM
larity Contest" which links to
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?popcon=
Just done so, but leaving open because it'd be neat IMHO to have the
actual data on the page somewhere, rather than merely a link. Don't know
where to put that info though.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffela
log. You should not pretend that you have the
maintainer's permission in adopting, which sort of implies from a
non-NMU upload with 'New maintainer', if that's simply false.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:26:13AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Is Tim Lear MIA?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302894
Pinged again (previously in November), let's see.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber &
now, can
take a few hours as all needs to be rebuild) it (this bug) will -- but
not the new package bug, that's something different (though related --
ditto missing .xml files, but for another reason).
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; IC
s bad. Why?
Because apparantly nobody really cares about those packages, and then
they are better off being removed, rather than only the most important
bugs fixed by bypassers, and for the rest the package left in an sad
state.
Just my two cents...
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROT
on is: 'it depends'. If you have a list, feel
invited to send it to -qa :).
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ng (in a good
sense) people on IRC about some issues he had with the security update,
since upstream isn't very clear at all about this stuff.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
my latest mail in the
thread[1], this issue is IMHO resolved as far as QA goes, please work
with the maintainer to resolve the FTBFS.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/10/msg1.html
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
;t know yet about his NM
rejection, thanks for the pointer.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
this to debian-qa? If you want to see
developers-reference changed, I think you should argue your case in the
BTS. If you have other intentions with your mail to QA, please enlighten
me.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, provided patch
- Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, made and tested
checks that are now in lintian
- Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, for motivating us to fix this
--Jeroen
diff -ur tar-1.13.92/debian/changelog tar-1.13.92.nmu/debian/changel
ality unfortunately.
Anyway, after a new bugs.txt is generated, execute this php script
(should take about 200ms with 8000 packages, so isn't much):
#!/usr/bin/php4
<?php
// Copyright 2004 Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
// This script may be redistributed under the conditions of the
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:29:56PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> developer.php is quite slow sometimes, especially on people with much
> packages, you can notice delays, it even timeouts sometimes.
Thanks to Martin
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:02:55AM +0100, Igor Genibel wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-18 19:30:05 +0100]:
>
> [I was very busy the last weeks so, I apologize about my silence]
n/p.
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> thanks a lot for this contribution I c
integer 12, as the dot is not recognized. However microtime() still
outputs dots and not comma's.
PHP's locale support is utterly broken, and thus I suggest to use the C
locale, as I also don't see a very good reason to use the French locale.
Regards,
--Jeroen
PS: some data source is
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:23:47PM +0100, Igor Genibel wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-23 14:05:11 +0100]:
>
> > Hi,
>
> hi Jeroen,
>
> > PHP's locale support is utterly broken, and thus I suggest to use the C
> > local
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:29:05PM +0100, Igor Genibel wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-23 16:55:50 +0100]:
> > > > PS: some data source is still stale, so that the package-maintainer
> > > > relationship isn't updated.
> [...]
MAIL PROTECTED]&comaint=yes
It is suspected that the cron job to connect to a public keyserver to
get the keys, doesn't work correctly anymore.
--Jeroen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frodo 2.6.3 #1 Wed Mar 3 17:35:38 CET
(as I believe is the case), take care this is correct :)
* Add to bugs.txt simply 'BTS_TIMESTAMP: unix_time(last-BTS-run)'.
* Fix developer.wml to read BTS_TIMESTAMP's timestamp, and not
bugs.date (I could write a patch if you want)
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMA
with old versions gets better populated).
That version of developer.php is outdated w.r.t. bugs and which package
<-> which maintainer, but the version info and age is uptodate
(currently, it isn't updated automatically).
What do you think? Both concept-wise, and layout-wise
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:37:37PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi Jeroen!
>
> I looked at your script's output and have some ideas for it:
>
> On 2004-03-08 16:46 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > I patched developer.php to show how long ago that very ver
tually be fixed.
Since it's not a really important feature imho (it used to be looked up
on keyservers, no WoT checking being done at all, so it's not really
something of any real use), there is not estimated time to fix yet.
--Jeroen
PS: Igor, you've not forgotten my 'attack
skspace is plenty, it isn't usually needed.
I think the packages.qa.debian.org maintainer should decide on this, and
turn this bug into a wishlist if he thinks it's worth doing some time,
or close it otherwise.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber &
tually Andi Barth's script could take over
(using ldap as input). That hasn't happened so far obviously.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
pgpIHBOUVUtk7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:11:45AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-01 01:53]:
> > Err... you disabled too much, as the bugs.txt generation is still
> > happening from your account. The script you use for that, isn't
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:51:26AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-01 02:47]:
> > DDPO says:
> > Bug information: Wed Mar 31 09:00:14 UTC 2004
>
> I don't know what you see.
>
> Bug information: Thu A
ckage,
otherwise, it is not unlikely someone else will take over maintainership
of it in the near future, or the package orphaned and maybe removed from
sarge.
--Jeroen
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/233556
[2] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mryan
[3] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/ssmtp
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:34:41PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:00:04PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > In a reaction to bug #233556 I asked[1] you two weeks ago to comment on a
> > RC bug open against your only[2] package, ssmtp[3].
> >
Thank you for having maintained ssmtp so far, I shall now proceed to
orphan the package, so somebody can take over maintainance of it.
If you have any tips or useful files lying around for a prospective new
maintainer, you can mail them to the bug report you'll be seeing in your
mailbox shortly.
inership
> > > of it in the near future, or the package orphaned and maybe removed from
> > > sarge.
> >
> > I'd be willing to take it, if necessary.
>
> Jeroen has orphaned it. Even if you're not interested in permanently
> maintaing it, you could
eally
very minor IMHO (shouldn't happen, if it happens you get outdated rather
than no info... still not good).
Alternatively, a mail being sent if the update somehow fails is also a
step in the right direction I think.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Because packages.qa.d.o is on master, it uses master's bug mirror, and I
guess that's the reason the bugcounts aren't updated anymore on
packages.qa.d.o
--Jeroen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testi
Why not drop that 'feature' at all? I don't really see a genuine use for
it, as there is no real check being done with the keyid (except for
DD's).
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
viour.
Maybe a different implementation (extra field where you can fill in a
binary package name) might be added sometimes, but that is 'nice to
have, but won't be very missed otherwise' IMHO.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:17:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040414 10:55]:
> > This was and is a feature, that is currently missing, but I don't regret
> > it... it was a heuristic anyways and as such promoted bad behaviour.
>
le
>
>
> So, it's not heuristic anymore, and only breaks if the result is not
> well-defined. I think this is acceptable.
Contradictio in terminis :), "It only breaks (...), this is acceptable"
implies heuristics.
But I agree it's acceptable :)
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van W
ages when the last update was, by
taking the first (source) timestamp, rather than what typically happens
the last one, which doesn't mean anything if one step earlier something
is broken/outdated.
And of course, you can then very easily verify whether stuff is
uptodate.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen
ystrips in about a week.
Martin Michlmayr already orphaned all Rene Weber's packages, for
dailystrips:
http://bugs.debian.org/244452
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
iscussed just a few days ago already, or is my memory failing?
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
t install qa.debian.org, which should make it much easier
to move/install the QA stuff.
But first I want a new lintian :), due RSN.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:20:37AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Shouldn't this bug be reassign to ftp.debian.org?
> >
> > IMHO, yes, ftp-master can fix this, or at least advice as how to fix it.
&g
this case I'd say additionaly, tagging the
appropriate bugs as 'help' might also attract people, and (also
important) make it clear in the bug overview page that the maintainer(s)
won't be able to quickly solve that bug(s) and is looking for additional
advice/help.
--Jeroen
[0]
the gnome team's packages
> > along with the usual bug data, versions, etc found on DDPO
I'm already looking into it, no ETA though.
Bluefuture: The interface that is needed for DDPO and the PTS is like
this:
: [ | "N/A" | "Error" ]
For resp. upstream version, no
is more in the line I was thinking of implementing it.
When lintian has better support to differentiate amongst different
checks, that would become something like:
2 policy violations, plus possibly 3 more, 8 other possible mistakes
This is currently pending on a better daily lintian-run ov
an only be found on
merkel or in any case, only accessible for DD's.
If I understand correctly, this script is already used now (via my own
computer) to generate bug summaries for the PTS again, thanks to Andreas
Barth.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwa
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Please find attached a newers bugs-summary generating script to be run
> for QA, which will generate bug summaries for the PTS, DDPO, and
> potentially further use.
Oh, and place don't name it process-index,
Hi Rapha?l,
At http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/pts.bugs.txt you can find fresh
(pushed from spohr, directly regenerated) bug information for the PTS.
New bugsummaries are moved over, so you should never get only a part of
the file.
Andreas Barth told me he knew where you fetched the bugstuff
a yesterday, that one is supposed to run
on merkel and then generate this very file for PTS & DDPO, available via
http & local filesystem.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
robably are going to mail
ftp-masters more often to enquire about the status, while it could also
be made possible that they can check the status themselves...
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
isn't something that is urgent a.t.m.).
Any change on merkel right now might require debugging, and debugging by
proxy isn't very efficient nor for the proxy, nor for the debugger :).
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 03:25:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Err, so non-DD's cannot check it anymore? Why does that service need to
> > be a DD only service? There were only the .changes to begin with.
&
retitle 243668 packages.qa.d.o should move from master to merkel
severity 243668 wishlist
thanks
packages.qa.d.o should still move to merkel, but this is only a
wishlist.
It being on master wasn't the reason for the failed bug stats (which has
been worked around for now).
--Jeroen
--
J
(dropped -devel, this is not relevant for -devel)
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:39:00AM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Il sab, 2004-05-01 alle 16:18, Jeroen van Wolffelaar ha scritto:
>
> >
> > Bluefuture: The interface that is needed for DDPO and the PTS is like
> > th
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 07:32:06PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Quoting Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> > retitle 243668 packages.qa.d.o should move from master to merkel
> > severity 243668 wishlist
> > thanks
> >
> > packages.qa.d.o should still move to merkel
n
you have time for to give the attention they deserve. That's why I ask
you to ask yourself whether it might be better for the sake of Debian in
general if you orphaned/seek a new maintainer for some of them.
For any advice on this, please mail debian-qa if needed.
Kind regards,
--Jeroen
[1]
ve no reason to doubt it) very
much and very hard work in the past, amongst other w.r.t. dpkg and the
like. I really don't know what to do about this, because of the
above-quoted thread, I'd like your opinion first before burning my
fingers on the issue.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[E
Gopal, you did not yet reply to this mail I sent a month ago. How are
you doing?
Could you please reply to this mail?
--Jeroen
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:18:05AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Hi Gopal,
>
> I just took a look at your package list[1], and I believe you maybe
refer some respected long-time DD gives his opinion/handles this...
--Jeroen
- Forwarded message from Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 15:52:41 +0200
To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Advice on a certain maintainer
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL
n-revision part of the version), so no name clashes, even if
you keep the upstream-part of the version number the same.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
to the upstream changelog (additions), and already bumps the
reported version number as 1.0.3 (!), but hasn't yet been released on
GNU's website.
Since there was no upstream release since March 2001, maybe this package
should be removed from the archive altogether.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2001 30 8 32 20
2002 65 18 3 7
2003 4 0 1 2
2004 0 0+
which shows nicely that Brian was a very active and valuable
contributor, but recently hasn't very much time anymore for his
packages. Brian, I think you should let go some or all of them?
--Jeroen
[1] http://list
gt; of the [pcmcia-cs] package.
I guess he complete missed that Per hijacked that package off him...
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
apt/sources.list:
deb(-src) http://jeroen.a-eskwadraat.nl/sw/debian EXPERIMENTAL squirrelmail
(.deb's in delayed are not available to non-DD's)
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
