Maybe you should call the Microsoft support?
It is theree Operating System!
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-04-14 16:36:12, schrieb vamsee krishna:
> Hi, my system has gophers and i tried removing from registry later restarted
> the computer and it's back again in registry. Tried deletin
Hi, my system has gophers and i tried removing from registry later restarted the computer and it's back again in registry. Tried deleting many temp and IE files, still nogo. Please help me. Thanx in advance. "Our lives are not determined by what happens to us but by how we react to what happens,
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:16:04AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:57:49PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > When I worked on it for hamm, I basically packaged it from scratch
> > (the old source format was ugly). I had intended to go back and get
> > it to build the gopherd p
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:57:49PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> When I worked on it for hamm, I basically packaged it from scratch
> (the old source format was ugly). I had intended to go back and get
> it to build the gopherd package at a later date, but I haven't yet.
>
> Hence it was not deli
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 05:12:32PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:28:47PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > 3. Lynx is free and handles gopher URLs on a text terminal
>
> Last time I checked, Lynx doesn't handle gopher forms. [Whether anyone
> cares is a different issue. I
> > > 4. The package is not complete; the source also includes the gopher
> > >server but there is no debian package.
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This was deliberate. [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client.
> > It's another to distribute a non-free server.]
On Fri, Oc
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:26:17PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client.
> > It's another to distribute a non-free server.]
>
> I am not sure what you mean? Is a non-free server really bad?
E.g. if a root exploit is made for a non-free server, we couldn'
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 4. The package is not complete; the source also includes the gopher
> >server but there is no debian package.
>
> This was deliberate. [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client.
> It's another to distribute a non-free server.]
I am not sure wh
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:28:47PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> 3. Lynx is free and handles gopher URLs on a text terminal
Last time I checked, Lynx doesn't handle gopher forms. [Whether anyone
cares is a different issue. I suppose someone ought to check what
popularity-contest has on this iss
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:28:47PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> 1. It is not maintained upstream
> 2. It is non-free
> 3. Lynx is free and handles gopher URLs on a text terminal
> 4. The package is not complete; the source also includes the gopher
>server but there is no debian package.
>
>
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose we remove the gopher package (maintained by me) immediately.
> Reasons:
>
> 1. It is not maintained upstream
> 2. It is non-free
> 3. Lynx is free and handles gopher URLs on a text terminal
> 4. The package is not complete; the source also incl
I propose we remove the gopher package (maintained by me) immediately.
Reasons:
1. It is not maintained upstream
2. It is non-free
3. Lynx is free and handles gopher URLs on a text terminal
4. The package is not complete; the source also includes the gopher
server but there is no debian package
12 matches
Mail list logo
