On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:26:17PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > > [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client. > > It's another to distribute a non-free server.] > > I am not sure what you mean? Is a non-free server really bad?
E.g. if a root exploit is made for a non-free server, we couldn't be able to properly fix it, in time, especially if the license doesn't allow any modifications[1] and upstream authors are dead... [1] I don't know if this applies to gopherd. -- enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
