Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: debsources
Hello,
over 10 years ago, I was one of the main authors of the scripts extracting l10n
informations from all packages.
The page https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/ and all the others
are the result of this opening each and every p
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 07:26:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le dimanche 07 août 2005 à 16:35 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
> > Regardless of my opinion on it[1], please do *not* hijack qa's
> > subversion repository for it. If you really insist this is a good idea
> > to persue, ple
Hello,
the cruft package is in a rather sorry state, with no version in more than 2
years, and a whole bunch of easy to fix bugs. Some of them greatly reducing
its usability while others hinder the whole debian installation process
(interactive post-inst script).
I proposed my help on 26 Apr 2005
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 06:44:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not a debian developer, so i could not po
[Why to cc on policy? Cut]
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> >If people don't care as much about this as you think they should,
> >perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *should*
> >care, instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic
> >under
Hey dude,
could you please orphan your package if you don't plan to maintain it? Thats
the very least you can do for them. Likewise, sitescooper was not updated
since 2001-10 and you never answered to the important #14375, 2 years old.
You said in this very bug that you were ok with someone adopt
[I cced the qa list, since they may know the answer better than me...]
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Why has qa.debian.org no i18n? If someone does not know may English and he
> wants to help, I think the only real possibilities are qa-work or learning
> Engl
[debian-qa in CC since my proposal is a QA one]
Hello,
I'd like to congratulate you, msttcorefonts is the most installed package
(according to popcon) still using the old deprecated way to handle debconf
template and not po-debconf (leaving alone orphaned package I'll take care
of very soon).
I
Hello,
Lastest upload of this package was on 2003-10-02 (version
0.0.20031002.13.trunk-1). Since then, mozilla had 6 releases, so I think
there is no need for such an ancient cvs release, even in unstable.
Moreover, I have the feeling that this package is exactly the category that
shouldn't come o
Hello,
I had a look at the kdrill package because it uses old-style debconf
templates without the po-debconf system. I was about to build a patch to
solve this, but I notice that this package is in a very bad shape:
- new upstream version 6.3.1 (07.02.2004)
- FTBFS since 20 Nov 2002 for a stupid
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no
>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no
> reverse depends.
>
> Only issue is that we released it with woody.
>
> Are there any objections to removing it from sid/testing?
Err, that's a bad argument, but I use it...
Hello, it's the upstream author again.
Last time we spoke about xbubble, you said that you were woried about the
size of the package, which where due to the amount of graphics added since
version 0.2.x. You also said that you wanted to split the data in another
package, but were lacking the time t
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:37:43PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 07:55:36AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > Is it possible to roll back the previous version of gv in testing
>
> That's never done.
I guess that means "no" ;)
> > sin
Is it possible to roll back the previous version of gv in testing since
xaw3dg seems to be blocked out of testing by gcc3.3 ?
Or does anybody knows a possible solution beside forcing the download of
xaw3dg from unstable on all testing box where gv is needed ?
Thanks, Mt.
- Forwarded message
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Martin Quinson écrivait:
>
> > Would it be possible to download your already computed xml files hierarchy?
> > It would save me valuable time.
>
> It's s
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:54:17PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:45:41PM +0200, Martin Quinson écrivait:
> > Of course I am willing to help and do my part of the job if I'm
> > directed to the right parts of the source.
>
> Goot to hear that
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-20
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I was wondering if it would be possible to add a new box to the package
status page about the status of translations in that package.
All the needed infos are already extracted from the packages by a cron
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 07:14:11PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi debian-qa list members,
>
> Just a simple question -
>
> Is content language in qa.debian.org only English?
> (there is no translations?)
>
> and if I want to translate it, what is needed?
As far as I can see, the source co
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:18:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[a lot of right thing I did overview]
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > (and remove that buggy page from the qa webserver :)
>
> No. I spotted the recently introduced nsd problem b
lease?
Bye, Mt.
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This page does not seem to be uptodate. It lists 3 packages, and when I look
> further, only one of them seems to still contain /usr/doc or /usr/man stuff.
>
> gtklp seems to follow the
Hello,
This page does not seem to be uptodate. It lists 3 packages, and when I look
further, only one of them seems to still contain /usr/doc or /usr/man stuff.
gtklp seems to follow the FHS since version 0.9n-1 (20 Jun 2002)
siagoffice-common seems also to follow the FHS (diff.gz contains
modif
Hello,
The RC bug here is #198921 against crystalspace (FTBFS on hppa because it
links static libs in a shared lib; no idea of why it does not cause problem
on the other archs).
The other bug I would like to increase the severity is #148955 against
lib3ds (which is 'important' for now), asking to
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:08:32PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:53:58 +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > you uploaded a new version of gtk-doc the 2003-06-19 (maintainer:
> > debian-qa) to fix a few bugs, but you forgot the #196073 one, which were
>
Hello,
you uploaded a new version of gtk-doc the 2003-06-19 (maintainer:
debian-qa) to fix a few bugs, but you forgot the #196073 one, which were
marked pending by the maintainer before orphaning, and not fixed.
Could you please reupload this package with the needed dependency ?
Thanks, Mt.
--
Kai, I don't understand you at all and you don't answer the private mails
sent to you, so I'm gonna abuse this bug repport to try to discuss with you.
[with a CC on debian-qa so that other people can jump into the discussion]
You packaged the RFCs, which are a very important piece of informations,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 01:34:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Quinson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > here is the mail I made one week ago to vorlon stating that I did repackage
> > doc-rfc, closing most of its bugs on the way. I'm resending this to
> > debi
Forwarded message from mquinson -
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:45:05 +0200
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: doc-rfc package
[...]
Ok, I finnaly found my previous work on this package on an old and forgotten
computer, and continue
essage-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
From: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: text/plai
[Please keep Kai and me in CC while responding on the list]
[Jordi, you're in CC because your are my AM, and I want to convince you of
my maintainer abilities ;]
Here is a mail about the status of the doc-rfc-* packages. As anyone knows,
those packages have a bunch of bugs opened, some of them bei
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:42:11PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | testing | m68k
> > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | unstable | m68k
> > clisp | 1999-07-22-5 |stable | sour
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:22:33AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 02:07:47PM -0800, Martin Quinson écrivait:
> > -- Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 26 Jan 1997 16:49:19
> > -0500
> >
> > and he's right, maint
Hello,
I've noticed that some packages from the one I have installed contain this
test in their preinst:
---
#!/bin/sh
set -e
dpkg --assert-working-epoch 2>&- || {
echo -e "\nYou must upgrade dpkg before installing this package.\n"
false
}
It seems ba
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:54:58AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Martin!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > Here is a small stupid script to find packages owning a directory in
> > /usr/share/doc without its counterpart in /usr/doc :
>
> Lintian already checks for this.
Oh. Well. It's the second time in a
Hello,
I've seen a lot of effort to remove all files from /usr/doc in profit to
/usr/share/doc, but nobody trying to enforce the part "13.4 Accessing the
documentation" of the policy. It is written "each package must maintain a
symlink /usr/doc/package that points to the new location of its
docume
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 00-12-12 Cord Beermann wrote:
>
> > He is also responsible for the mailx-package, which hasn't been
> > touched by him since mid-98, although there were appearing some
> > security-related bugs, which had to be fixed through NMUs.
>
> Well, I think
Hello,
As I've annouced a few month ago on -devel an -i18n (without reaction), I've
done a perl script which work as lintian : it unpacks every source package
and grep it as a fury. But it don't search for errors in packaging, it
search for .po files and nls catalogs. Then, it makes nice repports
> On 00-03-06 Martin Schulze wrote:
> > . Are all dependencies and recommends fulfilled within every
> >respective priority fulfilled?
>
> Huh, I figured out how to find out which dependancies are unment and I
> could work on this tomorrow.
Sorry, but I thought it was the purpose of :
http:
38 matches
Mail list logo
