On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no > > > reverse depends. > > > > > > Only issue is that we released it with woody. > > > > > > Are there any objections to removing it from sid/testing? > > > > Err, that's a bad argument, but I use it... > > > > Do you have any drop-in remplacement solution ? That may be a stupid > > question, but if the package is dropped and it exists a remplacement > > solution, a Replace + Provide dependency may be useful to users. > > What about plain old gnome-terminal? It supports tabs...
Hey, cool ! I'd say that multi-gnome-terminal can indeed be removed from the archive, and replaced by a dummy package depending on gnome-terminal, and with an explanation in the description and in the /usr/share/doc/News.Debian Sorry for the noise. Mt, wearing the dummy user cap.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
