My bad, I did check an old version of nsd. The lastest did achieve the FHS
transition. The good point is that I realized it before reopening the bug :)
So, I guess that's it, the FHS transition is completed !!
Could someone confirm that before I announce the good news to the DWN
authors, please?
Bye, Mt.
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This page does not seem to be uptodate. It lists 3 packages, and when I look
> further, only one of them seems to still contain /usr/doc or /usr/man stuff.
>
> gtklp seems to follow the FHS since version 0.9n-1 (20 Jun 2002)
>
> siagoffice-common seems also to follow the FHS (diff.gz contains
> modifications to move man to /usr/share/man), even if I failed to see when
> it were added from the changelog.
>
> Yet, the version available in main of nsd contains
> usr/man/man8/nsd.8.gz
> usr/man/man8/nsdc.8.gz
> usr/man/man8/zonec.8.gz
>
> but I'm quite puzzeled by this one since the changelog of the last version
> reads: * Fixed mandir location to /usr/share/man (Closes: #199652)
> [Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:31:53 +0200]
>
> and when I recompile this package on my machine, the man pages are located
> in the right location.
>
> So, I reopened the bug #199652 to ask for a rebuild and an upload of the
> right binary, and when it's done, I guess we can publically declare that
> after 4 years, we finally managed to achieve the FHS transition...
>
> (and remove that buggy page from the qa webserver :)
>
> Thanks, Mt.
>
> --
> La tragedie de l'homme moderne n'est pas qu'il en sache de moins en moins
> sur le sens de la vie mais que cela ne le derange presque plus.
> --- Vaclav Havel
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
- Les morts ne sont plus ici et ils ne votent pas, j'en ai peur.
- Vous vous trompez. Ils sont ici et ils votent. On appelle ça la
tradition et ils ont majorité à vingt contre un.
-- Johny Maxwell (Terry Pratchett)
