On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:42:11PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | testing | m68k > > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | unstable | m68k > > clisp | 1999-07-22-5 | stable | source, alpha, i386, powerpc > > clisp | 1999-07-22-5 | testing | powerpc > > clisp | 2000-03-06-2 | testing | source, alpha, i386 > > clisp | 1:2.27-0.5 | unstable | source, alpha, i386, powerpc, > > s390 > > > > Currently the program has major (multiple) portability problems with > > all other archs, as all you can see from buildd. > > IMHO, all portability problems should at this > > time be forwarded to upstream (who did not release update since last july), > > and control file modified to build only on valid archs. > > Or dropped on woody :( > > As you can see from the changelog and WNPP bug, I started working on this > package when I found that there was a new upstream release after a long > dormant period. I had hoped that it would address some of the long-standing > bugs, but it turned out to have at least as many problems as the previous > version. During the time that I was working on it, I received several > wishlist bugs indicating that there is quite a bit of interest in this > package, but it will probably be a lot of work to get it built on all Debian > architectures.
Just curiousity: is it a RC bug to declare a program i386 only when nothing really justify it (beside a long list of upstream portability bugs) ? Thanks, Mt.
