ou please bring them back? It seems odd that this still links to
Ubuntu bugs, but not the Debian ones any more.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Antonio Terceiro [2014-05-09 10:31 -0300]:
> Perhaps in the case when all tests are skipped adt-run should exit with
> 8 instead of 2?
Yes, I agree. I filed that as https://launchpad.net/bugs/1319427 to
avoid forgetting about it. Thanks for pointing out!
Martin
--
Marti
OUT_RESPONSE&field.tag=udstestcompetition
[3]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~auto-package-testing-dev/auto-package-testing/trunk
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; OSS<-ESD: Works well too.
Ubuntu got a lot of bug reports about random desktop crashes/deadlocks
with esound, that's why I learned to hate it so much (apart from the
totally ridiculous video A/V desync).
> ALSA: The problems above.
> ALSA<-ESD: I never really tested.
Thanks
g.)
That's interesting indeed! So you avoid that by using an OSS driver
instead of the ALSA one? I can really not imagine how esound on top of
a broken ALSA driver would sound better than just using the ALSA
output directly?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http
buntu package as a basis for a Debian upload.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ct [1]. Please check the facts before becoming
rude.
Martin
[1] https://launchpad.net/merge-o-matic
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
c, or were
at the time when they were created.
Also, just as Debian maintainers do not forward all bugs to upstream
immediately, the same thing applies to Ubuntu maintainers. Of course
we always can (and try to) get better with time, right? :-)
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| ht
the BTS.
I know many DDs who work well with the Ubuntu devs, thus if it helps a
considerable number of DDs, and is opt-in, and someone wants to do the
work, why stop them?
Just my 2 c,
Martin
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ubuntu-patch;[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
n specific in libpq-dev.
Thus you should do
> -PGXS := $(shell pg_config --pgxs)
> +PGXS := $(shell /usr/lib/postgresql/8.2/bin/pg_config --pgxs)
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
).
Unfortunately I cannot test this, since I don't have ISDN or a modem.
Thanks for considering,
Martin
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=194541
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
e True Ghostscript
(named ghostscript) which replaces and obsoletes -gpl, -afpl, and
-esp. This should get to Debian soon.
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
Steve Langasek [2006-01-05 12:06 -0800]:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:08:35AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> > Nathanael Nerode [2006-01-05 3:29 -0500]:
> > > 281893 -- patched uninstallable bug in libroken16-kerberos4kth
> > > Orphan package and make QA uplo
ped library
duplication, ease security support, and clean up of old insecure
cruft.
(BTW, we eliminated krb4 in Ubuntu a while ago, it was fairly easy).
Thanks for considering,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debia
Hi!
Anibal Monsalve Salazar [2004-10-27 6:11 +1000]:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:36:44PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> >Martin Michlmayr [2004-10-26 11:41 -0300]:
> >>This suggests that his packages should be orphaned. Can you please
> >>discuss this with him.
> &
Hi *!
On 2004-03-08 17:47 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:37:37PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > On 2004-03-08 16:46 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > IMHO the date of last upload is a very bad indicator of the current
> > state of a p
Hi again!
Just a little clarification:
On 2004-03-08 17:37 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> last activity = MIN (last upload, last reply to bug,
>last tag setting to bug)
Of course all variables are counted in days and say 'n days ago';
with dates
your measuring to only one number, then I would favor a
new row; currently the version cells contain disturbingly many
numbers. If you keep the per-distribution activity, I think it is
quite okay since versions and last-upload days have different colors.
Thanks for your great wo
all I do in this case? Bug Report against
ftp.d.o or qa.d.o?
Martin
--
Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
pgpGVFGoUFYpC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
change
anything. Are there any other opinions? If not, I will use the NMU
number.
> * What to call *your* pgperl. Check that it doesn't conflict with any other
> existing packages before uploading this time. ;-)
This is already settled, I called it after the binary package:
libpg-per
artin
--
Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi again!
On 2004-01-27 14:39 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2004-01-26 22:49 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > 227793: libpgeasy
> > [...]
> > -- unhelpful upstream, QA has requested removal from sid
>
> Could you please wait a bit more before remov
ent email address and the official mailing list.
I hope to get answer from him. If he does not answer within 14 days, I
agree to remove it (no packages currently depend on it). But please
also consider what Oliver (the primary maintainer, CCed) says about
this.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Martin
-
es
> problems for now, but we shall see.
I don't want to attenuate your zeal :-), but is timidity without the
patches useful for anything? I helped myself out of the situation by
using the woody package; but that is certainly not a long-term
solution...
Thanks for any information!
Have a
!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
home: www.piware.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
k on a package, then please use the actual package bugs [1] [2] as
usual.
Martin
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/src:
--
Martin Pitt
home: www.piware.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
age and use it yourself, you might also want to
become the official maintainer of it (see Developer's Reference
5.9.5). You need a sponsor (i. e. an official Debian Developer) to do
this (see Developer's Reference 2.3).
Have a nice day!
Martin
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers
uld I
rather ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance and have a nice day!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
home: www.piware.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi again!
On 2003-10-14 18:47 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Pawel is around and did an upload of vpopmail after some prodding, but
> > I think he could use some
nes. I
would try to fix some bugs of it if nobody else already does.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
home: www.piware.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I still be of use here?
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
home: www.piware.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seemed to
be just a glitch on Sep 24.
And, BTW, I'm not behind a proxy. Even if I was, there is no reason a
proxy would invent these errors :-)
Thanks anyway and have a nice day!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
home: www.piware.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
--
Martin Pitt
home: www.piware.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is in the BTS [1] and the NMU
should take place in about three days. I will have prepared an updated
package up to then.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/190615 (last entry)
Thanks and have a nice Sunday!
Martin
P. S: Please cc me, I'm not subscribed.
--
Martin Pitt
home: www.piware.de
eMa
34 matches
Mail list logo
