Hi! On 2004-02-10 23:03 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >Do you think it is appropriate if I do the upload myself? I would only > >update the version number (so that it gets greater than the current > >one in unstable) and add an apropriate changelog entry. > > Yeah, it's good to fix things you broke. :-) You especially want to do this > before your pgperl makes it into sarge.
I agree, but I wanted to get a second opinion. > * Version number choice. I suggest version 1:2.18-4.1 for Stephen's pgperl; > it is greater than the "overwriting" version you uploaded; and is an NMU > version number so as to alert Stephen that something funny happened (in case > he loses all these emails). Apart from the epoch, it's the standard next NMU > version. :-) Hmm, I had not used a NMU version since I did not (really) change anything. Are there any other opinions? If not, I will use the NMU number. > * What to call *your* pgperl. Check that it doesn't conflict with any other > existing packages before uploading this time. ;-) This is already settled, I called it after the binary package: libpg-perl. Its already uploaded. Thanks and have a nice day! Martin -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
