Bug#758289: package in NEW not listed as pending upload

Control: reopen 758289 On 2014-08-25 Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: David Prévot 2014-08-22 <53f74278.4090...@debian.org> [...] >> As an additional data point, it seems to have stopped working early this >> month, probably Mon, 04 Aug 2014, since php-symfony-icu is marked as NEW >> for 20 hours [0]

Bug#758289: qa.debian.org: developer.php not updated for at least week

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pts ddpo Hello, the developer overview is outdated, e.g. https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ametz...@debian.org still shows kbtin as pending upload although it had been accepted 6 days ago. cu Andrea

Bug#732962: qa.debian.org: PTS cannot handle watchfile with signature checking (uscan.pl warning: unrecognised option pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/)

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Good Morning, I have recently upgraded some packages' watchfile to pull and check the upstream signature, however PTS seems to be unable to handle this. See e.g. . cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to

Bug#664322: qa.debian.org: mia-query out of date?

On 2012-03-17 Andreas Metzler wrote: > the information reported by mia-query on qa.debian.org seems to be out > of date: [...] > It shows latest activity on 2012-01-06, although I have made about 20 > uploads since then. Caused by this: ametzler@quantz:~$ ls -l /srv/qa.debian.o

Bug#664322: qa.debian.org: mia-query out of date?

Metzler Known as: Andreas Metzler Using emails: [...] activity-pgp:[Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:48:32] "BCF7 1345 BE42 B5B8 1A57 EE09 1D33 9C65 8B8D 7663" " archive/latest/415825" "" activity-from:[Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:51:30] "Andreas Metzler " " archive/latest/

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all again, > I just wrote, another, script which downloads the i386 and amd64 'versions' > of the packages listed by the script which checks for empty Build-/Depends > and compares the md5sums (from control.tar

Re: doomlegacy

On 2004-09-04 Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently > > in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other > > release-critical problems. It also has a number

Re: Inactive maintainer: Matthias Kabel (mkabel)

On 2004-08-09 "Christopher M. Hagar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This maintainer has not been maintaining his packages. I have sent him an > e-mail and recieved no response. The list archives indicate [1] that, > previously, he was only maintaining gtk-gnutella and not the others. Now, > there doe

Re: Standards for QA uploads?

On 2004-07-16 Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > * In most aspects of preparing a QA upload, follow NMU policy. Things like > ensuring your changes are as minimal as possible, and thoroughly testing > your changes, is very important. Since you're not the regular maintainer, > you p

Re: maintainer still active ?

On 2004-06-24 Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > > graphviz was released on 01-Mar-2004 maintainer started working on it on > > > 30-Mar-2004 ... now we already have 24-Jun-2004 and still no > > > graphviz-1.12 ... > ok. but could you please be more precise on when you plan t

Staging a comeback as DD after having retired.

Hello, I was searching for instructions on how to come back from (forced or willing) DD-retirement and could not find them. Just a simple mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] And how long is the procedure supposed to take? - Just weeks or something like DAM-approval in the NM queue? cu andreas

Re: Inactive maintainers

On 2004-06-14 Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040614 20:55]: [...] > > Not really. The old mysql-library libmysqlclient10 is still used a > > lot in Debian simply because libmysqlclient12 is licensed under GPL > > i

Re: Inactive maintainers

On 2004-06-14 Chris Hagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following maintainers are inactive, or at least aren't > maintaining their packages properly. I noticed because the version > of python2.3-mysqldb (Hoffleit) is very old and uses the library for > the old (3.x) release of mysql, which I thi

Re: Orphaning packages maintained by Scott K. Ellis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

On 2004-06-04 Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-03 12:14]: > > Scott seems to be MIA for quite some time, all his packages > > (liblogfile-rotate-perl, tree, xpp) have seen multiiple NMUs and > > Ho

Orphaning packages maintained by Scott K. Ellis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Hello, Scott seems to be MIA for quite some time, all his packages (liblogfile-rotate-perl, tree, xpp) have seen multiiple NMUs and [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /org/qa.debian.org/mia/mia-history scott [...] 2003-10-13: Orphaning: liblogfile-rotate-perl 2003-10-13: Orphaning: tree 2003-10-13:

Re: yiff

On 2004-05-16 Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:14:37AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > You have not run dselect on this machine since it was upgraded from > > stable to testing. - "apt-get upgrade" does not update

Re: yiff

On 2004-05-15 Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > My understanding is the available file is made from the downloaded Packages > files. > If you look at the binary package yiff-server, the version in stable seems > to be higher than the unstable version (and I can't see any evidence o

Re: Removing slang1-ja, jed-ja and slrn-ja?

On 2004-05-08 Niklas Matthies wrote: > On Sat 2004-05-08 at 16:31h, Frank Lichtenheld wrote on debian-japanese: > : > > All three packages slang1-ja, slrn-ja and jed-ja are orphaned for > > over a year without any sign of interest. All are really outdated > > policy wise but have no severe bugs.

Re: [404 Not Found] http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Quoting Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I don't know if it's a known problem because I have a huge mail back log > > ;-) but http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ is Not Found and returns > > a 404... > > > > Is there anoth

Re: Orphaning all packages by Matthias Kabel but gtk-gnutella.

On 2004-04-02 Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040402 16:40]: >> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-30 13:57]: >>>> Last upload: 2003-06-20

Bug#242719: qa.debian.org unreachable

On 2004-04-08 Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: important > Hi, > maybe you are already aware of the problem, but nobody reported it yet. > For some (!) days now, qa.debian.org isn't reachable at all for me. merkel is broken. http://lists.debian.org/de

Bug#241854: [packages.qa.debian.org] Only lists uploads to sid in News

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, In former times (iirc before it was moved to merkel) the news-section also listed uplods to experimental, but now they are missing. Check for example http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnome-applets.html 2.6.0-1 has been uploaded on March-27.

Re: Orphaning all packages by Matthias Kabel but gtk-gnutella.

Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-30 13:57]: >> Last upload: 2003-06-20 (0.9n-1) >> Latest maintainer contribution to the currently open (15+7) bugs: >> >> But he only seems to maintain gtk-gnutell

Orphaning all packages by Matthias Kabel but gtk-gnutella.

Hello, I started checking gtklp: Last upload: 2003-06-20 (0.9n-1) Latest maintainer contribution to the currently open (15+7) bugs: 2002-11-21 (#170025). This looked fishy, so I checked qa.d.o. Mathias is listed as maintainer of 7 packages: cd-circleprint gtk-gnutella gtklp newsflas

Bug#240463: qa.debian.org: Warnings in personal packages overview

On 2004-03-27 Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > since yesterday, personal "Packages overview" pages > (e.g. http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) contain > lines like: >

Re: Why two yEnc packages?

On 2004-03-25 Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we really need two yEnc packages in Debian? > Apparently yydecode can only decode, while yencode can do both, but > I'm not sure yencode is even still developed, while yydecode seems to > have an upstream. Can those two tools be merge

Re: Orphaning lightning

On 2004-03-23 Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [lightning] > Technical speaking you make a QA upload, because as soon as you set > the maintainer field to QA, bugs will be closed. > So, I'd say: make a maintainer-upload, and do a -v1.1-2, so that the > NMUed bug is also closed. [o] Done.

Re: Orphaning lightning

On 2004-03-23 Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-23 18:51]: >> Marco Kuhlmann has retired from the project (see #230690) but >> lightning is not orphaned. > Orphaned, thanks. I intend to make an upload to fix

Orphaning lightning

Hello, Marco Kuhlmann has retired from the project (see #230690) but lightning is not orphaned. cu andreas

Orphaning/Removing Anubis

Hello, Anubis' maintainer Janusz A. Urbanowicz seems to be MIA. Two packages: anubis: * Last maintainer upload on 2003-03-25. Two NMUs since. * sterilize: last upload 2002-10-29 As Joshua Kwan is currently preparing a NMU of anubis to fix an rc bug we could jump at the chance and set the maintain

Re: What about removing mozilla-snapshot from unstable as well?

On 2004-03-16 Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:42:25PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: [...] > > Is anyone interested in maintaining a mozilla-snapshot package in > > experimental? > Err, presumably it should just be called "mozilla" in that case? I think mozilla-snapshot and moz

Re: [tausq@debian.org: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:21:50PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Can someone please NMU? > > - Forwarded message from Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > > From: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid > Date: Sun

Re: Zephaniah E. Hull (warp@debian.org) MIA ?

On 2004-03-11 Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:37:34PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2004-03-11 Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is Zephaniah E. Hull ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is MIA? > > > his last up

Re: Zephaniah E. Hull (warp@debian.org) MIA ?

On 2004-03-11 Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is Zephaniah E. Hull ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is MIA? > his last upload is nearly one year ago. > He maintains GPM which is an important piece of software. The sid > version is the same as the woody version and has some problematic bugs. > Also

Re: Brian Mays inactive/MIA?

On 2004-03-08 Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm suspecting that Brian Mays might be MIA. What I've found: > * It seems like there hasn't been any activity from him since his last > upload of pcmcia-cs from 8th November. Joey Hess said that the > upload was done only because he thre

Re: Candidates for oldlibs

On 2004-02-28 Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm suggesting these be moved to oldlibs. > Opinions? Agreement? Disagreement? Have I misunderstood the function of > oldlibs? ;-) [...] > libgnutls5 -- libgnutls7 and libgnutls10 are *both* available now [...] Imho all depending pac

Re: PTS subscription busted?

On 2004-02-26 Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Andreas Metzler: >> Obviously there are two errors: >> * gnutls10 _is_ a source package. > I use the "sources" file provided by the BTS. Obviously the update of > that file is erratic since t

PTS subscription busted?

On 2004-02-26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> Subject: Web subscription for gnutls10 package >> subscribe gnutls10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > gnutls10 is neither a source package nor a binary package. > It may be a 'virtual package' or a mistake... > A confirmat

Re: Time to remove a few test kernels?

On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:48:24AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, you wrote: >> The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time >> ago. >> Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian >> yet. > > Which is

Re: PFE

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:57:10PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Martin! > You wrote: > > It fails to build from source here (on mips): > [...] > > 16:37 so what's the fix? > > 16:37 you'd need to upgrade it to libtool 1.5 > How? libtoolize? (Which wil fail miserably if the program is usin

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:25:38AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Isn't this moot now? Progeny is using anaconda and afaik[1] anaconda uses > > kudzu instead of discover(2). > > debian-installer currently uses discover v1. I was not refering to di

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 23:20]: > > > * discover: Orphan & QA-upload. Its current maintainer(s) are simply not > > p.s. I don't know how capable I am of taking this package, but I'm > > willing to try and

Re: RFS: g5: GTK+-based five-in-a-row game

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:00:21PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote: > g5 (0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low > * Morphed into a native Debian package. Why? cu andreas

Re: Confused about #214404

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:44:32PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > I'm looking at doing an upload of lprngtool with the maintainer set to the > QA group and possibly fixes for #12092, #207722, #161550, but #214404 > perplexes me somewhat. > The way I read it, an NMU was made 34 days ago fixing th

Re: building in a chroot

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:19:13PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:28:36PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 19:36]: > > > This mail, > > > > > > talks about one

Re: Dima Barsky MIA?

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Dima Barsky wrote: > No, I'm still alive, only came back from holidays yesterday. I'll need > a few days to go through my mailbox, so I intend to upload the next > version of cyrus-sasl2 this weekend. Sorry for the noise. thanks, cu andreas

Dima Barsky MIA?

Hello, Browsing over the RC bugs list I ended up checking cyrus-sasl2's page on packages.qa.debian.org. According to the public[1] echelon info (Last modified) dima was last seen on 2003/08/13 12:49:13 UTC and most of the packages have been NMU'd at least once. I am asking because libsasl2 is prio

Re: [Nicolas.Sabouret@lip6.fr: Bug#206554: new gv entered testing but xaw3dg didn't]

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 07:55:36AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > Is it possible to roll back the previous version of gv in testing since > xaw3dg seems to be blocked out of testing by gcc3.3 ? > > Or does anybody knows a possible solution beside forcing the download of > xaw3dg from unstable on a

Re: Process for doing a "QA upload"

On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 09:02:15AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: [...] > So, let me give a more precise example : the cxhestris package. [...] > cxhextris (1.0-23.2) unstable; urgency=low > > * Non-maintainer upload > * Fixed the fuzzy translation in fr.po. Closes: #206345 > > -- Christ

Orphaning slocate?

Hello, Afaict slocate should be orphaned, the last maintainer upload was 2.6-1, on Thu, 14 Jun 2001, since then there have been 5 NMUs by different developers. slocate won't be caught by any scripts searching for this because the last NMU used an incorrect version-number labelling it as maintainer

Re: Intent to hijack findutils

On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 08:05:08AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On Saturday 12 July 2003 03:55, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > [1] I have not interacted with it a lot, is it possible to send mails > > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > doesn't it use a modified version

Intent to hijack findutils (was: Bug#200894: findutils: New upstream version 4.1.20)

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:08:44PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > findutils' has got a new upstream maintainer and seems to be > semiactive. A new test version 4.1.20 has been released. > I've spent a little time working on it and have a preliminary diff on=20 > http://

Bug#200894: findutils: New upstream version 4.1.20

Package: findutils Version: 4.1.7-2 Severity: wishlist findutils' has got a new upstream maintainer and seems to be semiactive. A new test version 4.1.20 has been released. I've spent a little time working on it and have a preliminary diff on http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/debian/misc/

Re: Bug#117561: Proposition of solution to this problem [about doc-rfc]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:42:23AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > Kai, I don't understand you at all and you don't answer the private mails > sent to you, so I'm gonna abuse this bug repport to try to discuss with you. > [with a CC on debian-qa so that other people can jump into the discussion] >

Removing libsdl-mm0.1?

Hello, Shouldn't libsdl-mm0.1 be simply removed from the distribution? No other packages depend on it, it has an RC-bug (C++ transition), and upstream seems to be dead, too (latest release 0.1.8 August 13, 2001, only three postings to their mailing-list in 2002 and 2003). popcon results:

Re: tkdvi is unmaintained

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:56:29PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > It seems that tkdvi is unmaintained, no upload since two years, > and a NMU never acknowledged. > > Is Anselm Lingnau MIA ? I've sent a mail to him, he ist still quite active in German usenet. cu andreas pgpAC2VJgtkrg