Processed: [jrv@kosh.mitre.org: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages]]

2003-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages Bug reassigned from package `qa.debian.org' to `ftp.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trackin

Bug#204547: [jrv@kosh.mitre.org: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages]]

2003-09-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org thanks - Forwarded message from Jim Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Jim Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages] Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:35:20 -0400 To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-

Re: maintainership of binutils

2003-09-10 Thread Julien LEMOINE
Hello, On Thursday 11 September 2003 00:43, Robert Millan wrote: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > well, I would like not to get more involved in binutils than I > > currently am. James Troup offered to take over maintainership some > > time ago, and Dan Jacobowitz is involved upstr

Re: maintainership of binutils

2003-09-10 Thread Robert Millan
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > well, I would like not to get more involved in binutils than I > currently am. James Troup offered to take over maintainership some > time ago, and Dan Jacobowitz is involved upstream as well in > binutils, so maybe we have better candidates? It should

Re: maintainership of binutils

2003-09-10 Thread James Troup
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > well, I would like not to get more involved in binutils than I > currently am. James Troup offered to take over maintainership some > time ago, and Dan Jacobowitz is involved upstream as well in > binutils, so maybe we have better candidates? I don't k

Re: Need help with mgetty and maintainership problems

2003-09-10 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Andreas Barth wrote: > Yes, I considered that. However, I do not like that. If a package is > broken, it should IMHO be fixed and not duplicated. But if this is the > least-wrong way, I would go it. I don't think this would be the least-wrong way. In any case it would be mgetty-bugfixed, not

Re: maintainership of binutils

2003-09-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:23:57AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Martin Michlmayr writes: > > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-09 18:02]: > > > > Chris, the binutils changelog indicates that the package has been left > > > > unmaintained for quite some time: > > > > > > > > - 209 days

Re: Need help with mgetty and maintainership problems

2003-09-10 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030910 15:27]: > * Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030910 15:05]: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:43:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > I also offered > > > to take over maintainership, or co-maintainership if the current > > > maintainer prefer t

Re: Need help with mgetty and maintainership problems

2003-09-10 Thread Andreas Barth
* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030910 15:05]: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:43:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I also offered > > to take over maintainership, or co-maintainership if the current > > maintainer prefer this. > What was the answer? That he plans to abandon mgetty

Re: Need help with mgetty and maintainership problems

2003-09-10 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:43:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > I also offered > to take over maintainership, or co-maintainership if the current > maintainer prefer this. > What was the answer? > However, as we get nearer the sarge release time, my understanding of > not inclusion the patches

Need help with mgetty and maintainership problems

2003-09-10 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, I've a bit delicate problem with mgetty. The last working upload was on 2002-12-01. I begun to beg the maintainer at the beginning of April of fixing bugs (and tagged bugs myself and added patches). However, all uploads since then broke outgoing fax stuff (and thus raised a RC-bug, filled by

Processed: Re: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages

2003-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 204547 qa.debian.org Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Re: /org/qa.debian.org/data/ftp not being updated?

2003-09-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:34:55PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > It seems /org/qa.debian.org/data/ftp is not being updated. Can you > take a look at this, weasel? > > -rw-rw-r--1 weasel qa4002763 Sep 7 01:13 > /org/qa.debian.org/data/ftp/unstable/all/Sources.all ftp-update is

Re: maintainership of binutils

2003-09-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Martin Michlmayr writes: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-09 18:02]: > > > Chris, the binutils changelog indicates that the package has been left > > > unmaintained for quite some time: > > > > > > - 209 days with RC bugs. > > > - 13 consecutive NMUs. > > > - last maintainer upload