On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:43:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > I also offered > to take over maintainership, or co-maintainership if the current > maintainer prefer this. >
What was the answer? > However, as we get nearer the sarge release time, my understanding of > not inclusion the patches is shrinking. I want the current faxspooler > to be in sarge, because it is much more secure from design (not longer > running under root). I provide (working) packages at > http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/debian/mgetty-woody/ > > My question now is: How should I proceed? Should I do a NMU? (If yes: > Who is willing to sponsor it?) Should I try to hijack? > Did you consider uploading of a new source mgetty-ng which replaces/provides/conflicts with mgetty ? So the choice could be left to the users. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
