Hi, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Yes, I considered that. However, I do not like that. If a package is
> broken, it should IMHO be fixed and not duplicated. But if this is the
> least-wrong way, I would go it.
I don't think this would be the least-wrong way. In any case it would be
mgetty-bugfixed, not mgetty-ng, which would make even less sense.
If you want/need a co-maintainer, I'm willing (and a DD ;-).
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
byob, v:
Believing Your Own Bull
