* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030910 15:27]: > * Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030910 15:05]: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:43:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > I also offered > > > to take over maintainership, or co-maintainership if the current > > > maintainer prefer this.
> > What was the answer? > That he plans to abandon mgetty in a few months, but I must pass the > NM-queue before being able to become a (co-)maintainer. (And my saying > that I can become maintainer as long as I find a sponsor didn't bring > me a new answer.) I better add that I wrote him (a bit later) about the release plan, and that mgetty needs an update and said the following ways (in order of preference): | - You upload a working package | - You appoint me as a co-maintainer and I upload a working package | - I'm doing a NMU with your blessing. | - I'm doing a NMU without your blessing, which I wouldn't like. | - Someone else is doing a NMU with using the patches in the BTS, which | I even like less. (and I said that I would like it even less if there is no updated mgetty in sarge.) He said on 19 August that he'll upload "during the next days" - but nothing has changed. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
