Hi,
I have to make a small correction:
On Thu, 14.01.2010 at 10:44:53 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> * Newer versions of Zope 2, starting with 2.12, afair require Python
> 2.6.
Zope 2.12 requires a recent Python 2.5, but Plone 4.0, running on top
of Zope 2.12, requires Python 2.6.
Sorry for th
Hi,
On Tue, 12.01.2010 at 13:44:28 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:21:34PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > The information is there, it is unfortunately just well hidden:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/12/msg00207.html
>
> Ahh, that's a good catch. I
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 13:44, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:21:34PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> The information is there, it is unfortunately just well hidden:
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/12/msg00207.html
>
> Ahh, that's a good catch. I can not tell
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:21:34PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> The information is there, it is unfortunately just well hidden:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/12/msg00207.html
Ahh, that's a good catch. I can not tell whether the technical arguing
is correct but at least it gi
On 12.01.2010 03:08, Mr. Foobarra wrote:
> (CC'd, since it is not obvious to the casual bystander if Matthias
> reads bug reports or mailing lists)
>
> Dear Mr. Klose,
>
> I have grown woefully tired of watching respected developers ask
> nicely, tiptoe around, get angry, ask again after waiting
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:59:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> As log as you leave it as the maintainer's prerogative to nack the takeover,
> then that's fine.
Sure. That's what I intended to say when I said: "... if I do not hear
from you until 7 days I assume you agree."
> > The alterna
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:37:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Really?
>
> Here are some other words that go hand-in-hand with 'package hijack':
>
> - vigilante
> - antisocial
> - arrogant
> - acrimonious
> - disrespectful
> - demotivating
Are you really sure that these attributes will
Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 02.37 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> > Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 00.06 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Ja
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:24:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I never said it is a noble enterprise.
I was responding to Sandro.
> I would simply call it common sense that a group should not allow a single
> person to block an important package. After such a long time of ignorance
> by not r
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> > I have no idea what makes you think that even more angry mails on public
>> > mailing list will solve the problem.
>
>> B
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 00.06 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > I have no idea what makes yo
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:06:09AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> A group hijack is still a hijack. I don't know why you try to make this
> sound like some sort of noble enterprise for the good of Debian.
I never said it is a noble enterprise. I would simply call it common
sense that a group
Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 00:06 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> A group hijack is still a hijack. I don't know why you try to make this
> sound like some sort of noble enterprise for the good of Debian.
It doesn’t have to be noble. But it is often useful nevertheless.
--
.''`. Josselin
Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 00.06 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > I have no idea what makes you think that even more angry mails on public
> > > mailing list will solve
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I have no idea what makes you think that even more angry mails on public
> > mailing list will solve the problem.
> Be quiet won't solve it either, sadly. That's proved by the lo
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have no idea what makes you think that even more angry mails on public
> mailing list will solve the problem.
Be quiet won't solve it either, sadly. That's proved by the long
silent period that provides not advance on the python
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 07:18:03AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> > 1) Upload python2.6 to unstable within the next 7 days, or
> > 2) RFA python2.6 and all relevant python packages within the next 7 days.
> ...
>
> Easy as it can be, just leave Python to Debian, and step over. I have
> no doubt th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:08, Mr. Foobarra wrote:
> I have grown woefully tired of watching respected developers ask nicely,
> tiptoe around, get angry, ask again after waiting a few weeks, and continue
> to make every attempt to give you
(CC'd, since it is not obvious to the casual bystander if Matthias reads bug
reports or mailing lists)
Dear Mr. Klose,
I have grown woefully tired of watching respected developers ask nicely, tiptoe
around, get angry, ask again after waiting a few weeks, and continue to make
every attempt to g
19 matches
Mail list logo
