On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:59:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > As log as you leave it as the maintainer's prerogative to nack the takeover, > then that's fine.
Sure. That's what I intended to say when I said: "... if I do not hear from you until 7 days I assume you agree." > > The alternative is to ask the TC but if you ask me the resulting decision > > of the TC is quite obvious and it is common sense as well to save TC > > peoples time. > > Why do you think it's appropriate for anyone other than the TC to say what > the TC would decide? I assumed that the TC would come to a similar conclusion as the majority of people on debian-python an debian-devel (last month). > If your position is that it's "obvious" that the TC would confirm Sandro as > the new maintainer of python, then based on a sample size of one TC member, > I would disagree. I rather assumed that the TC would agree that Python should be maintained by a *group* of maintainers which consists of Matthias, Sandro and perhaps others who seemed heavily involved. And I even stronger assumed that the TC would vote for a change of the current situation. But as I said as well I might be wrong here. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org