On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:06, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: >> > I have no idea what makes you think that even more angry mails on public >> > mailing list will solve the problem. > >> Be quiet won't solve it either, sadly. That's proved by the long >> silent period that provides not advance on the python >> maintainership-side. At least i'm proposing to form a group (and be >> part of that) to take over maintainership. > > A group hijack is still a hijack. I don't know why you try to make this > sound like some sort of noble enterprise for the good of Debian.
Where did I talk about hijack? If I wanted that, I'd have already done. 'take over' can be a wide concept: - form a team that contains Matthias and collaboratively maintain python - form a team that does not contain Matthias and collaboratively maintain python - ask the ctte to decide who's to maintain python, the new group or the current maint (that's what I was referring with "pushed further" in the initial reply) - something else What I (and many other people) want is a properly maintained python package, which is not now. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
