documentation.
Could someone help me out and tell me how one can get, not the bk head,
but an older revision ? Something equivalent to :
cvs co -r 2.4.18-pre3
Thanks for your help.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:06:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on isolating the pop patches from the generic linuxppc
> patches. For this i need a 2.4.18-pre3 kernel from the ppc _devel tree.
>
> I suppose that this means the linux_2_4_devel tree.
>
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:03:58PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:21:32PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:06:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am working on isolating the pop patches from the
general and on powerpc in particular. I will try reading the mailing
list archive, and i just subscribed to the list, so i will get some idea
of this, but if someone feels like giving me a quick status report or
something, it would be kind.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
, has someone already used it sucessfully, and how do you tell it
which of the different kernel images you want in the package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:36:41PM +0200, Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >Hello, ...
> >
> >Yesterday, i tried to build a kernel-image ppc/pegasos package with
> >make-kpkg. The built went well, but no package was created and i didn't
>
as said, the HD is
almost empty, and i can reinstall the box once you are finished with it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:06:41PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:18:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:28:08AM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 04.06.03 um 08:42 Uhr schrieb Oliver Ripka:
> > >
problem for the rest of the stuff though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
install
And let it fix it again.
Then return to console 1 (alt+F1) and continue as usual. Maybe you will
have to kill the process with Ctr-C or something such, and it will ask
you again about re-retrieving the files.
Anyway, you can restart the base instalation by running base-config or
something such.
Friendly,
sven Luther
correct me if i did say wrong things.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
plier for the pegasos II.
> Of course, I have to declare an interest: I'm an AmigaOne distributor.
> However, that really is the situation as I understand today.
Nope, it is not, the new pegasos boards are good, the only real problem
is that they are almost all sold out.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
he AmigaONE solved the problem with a
firmware upgrade, which worked around the problem, while the pegasos
guys did go for a hardware patch.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:37:32PM +0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
Dutra wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:44:43 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Well, the pegasos boards are mostly outsold
>
> Too bad. Or too good?
Well, there were not that many produced,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 07:34:31PM +0200, Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:37:32PM +0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
> >Dutra wrote:
> >
> >>I don't expect it to do any graphics: what I want is a fr
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:42:31PM +0200, Rose Humphrey wrote:
> Le mar 17/06/2003 à 10:44, Sven Luther a écrit :
>
> > > Do you think it production-stable for a server?
>
> Don't know about the Pegasos, but the AmigaOne has and is being fairly
> rigourously te
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:12:51PM +0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
Dutra wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:44:28 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >> > crossbar memory architecture. That said, some of the pegasos boards
> >> > may still be findab
21 from
Herbert Xu anyway.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
2.4.21-powerpc package. I am taking over
maintainership of the unstable powerpc kernels from Dan, and i have
already such a package ready, but i was not yet able to test it without
the 2.4.21 kernel-source package.
Just wait a few days for them.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On 18 Jun 2003 at 12:01, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > There is not yet a 2.4.21 kernel-source package, and as thus there is
> > also not yet a kernel-patch-2.4.21-powerpc package. I am taking over
> > mainta
i hope to have it fixed by tomorrow afternoon.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
nce i have finished uploading and created the
packages file :
deb http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc ./
Could someone with pmac hardware test them and confirm that they work
before i upload ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:12:04AM +0100, Joss Winn wrote:
> Sven,
>
> I just grabbed your 2.4.20-4 pmac build and I've rebooted and it's fine.
:)))
> Two things that seem different from previous kernel upgrades (I
> could just have missed these before):
>
> It
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:10:13AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:18:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:12:04AM +0100, Joss Winn wrote:
> > > Sven,
> > >
> > > I just grabbed your 2.4.20-4 pmac b
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 07:29:48PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > it means that the kernel-patch-2.4.20-powerpc is in truth pmac only, and
> > should better be named kernel-patch-2.4.20-powerpc-pmac or something such ?
&
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 04:07:23PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:45:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:10:13AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:18:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:30:04AM +0200, Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>it means that the kernel-patch-2.4.20-powerpc is in truth pmac only, and
> >>should bet
ge again. That is neither filing a bug nor telling
> > the maintainer. I try to read this list, but posting to a list is no
> > substitute for dealing with the responsible people directly.
>
> Well, OK, you've seen the message by now, but you're no longer the
t; US...
Err, august that is, no ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
.20-7.
>
> Can anyone shed any light as to what might be wrong?
Use a newer gcc ?
Anyway, are you running sid, sarge or woody ?
I would upgrade gcc to 3.2 or 3.3 at least, and also install the newer
kernel-source-2.4.20-8. I will look into this, but please, fill a
propper bug report.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Debian package kernel-patch-benh, which now
> reflects the state of 2.4.20-ben10) and come back here with the output
> of "depmod -a; modprobe dmasound" when you got it running.
>
> Sven Luther writes:
>
> > Ok, ok, altough i have to warn you, i have no pmac hardware,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 06:26, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:55:04AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 00:24, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
> > > wrote:
and gcc 3.2 is the official sarge
compiler, and starting in kernel 2.4.21, gcc 3.3 don't cause major
problems.
In any case, i would strongly discourage to use gcc 3.0 or 3.1.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
just need to rebuild your own kernel with MAKEFLAGS="CC=gcc-2.95".
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:59:13PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:33:43AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > My config is attached. This was using GCC 3.0 on
> > > > > ker
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:03:51AM +, paubert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:32:10AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 06:26, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Ju
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:02:11PM +0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
Dutra wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:32:10 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >>
> >> Same difference, it'
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:46:50PM +, paubert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:12:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:03:51AM +, paubert wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:32:10AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Ju
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:28:48PM +0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
Dutra wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:07:20 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:02:11PM +0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
> > Dutra wrote:
> >
> >>
ou.
If they can sell the north bridge, there will assuredly be third parties
who will do such boxes, and if ibm is serious about linux on ppc, they
will sell motherboards themselves, i hope.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
; > on my spare time. (And I live in France ;)
> >
> > *Very* nice to know. Do you mean you are the main driver developer for
> > the PowerMacs?
>
> I maintain the PowerMac port of the kernel, yes.
>
> > BTW, do you have your G5 already? ;-)
>
> No :(
Maybe we should start a subsription to get you one ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
Dutra wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 08:10:12 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > If they can sell the north bridge, there will assuredly be third parties
> > who will do such boxes
>
> You are
i guess the database format it uses for its
playlists are not compatible in between upgrades or something such.
There is also quark, which i package, which works rather nicely, but
it's anti-GUI declared philosophy may not make it a replacement for
XMMS.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:57:00PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Jul 07 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > There is also quark, which i package, which works rather nicely, but
> > it's anti-GUI declared philosophy may not make it a replacement for
> > XMMS.
>
> I r
letting
unneeded things like the i8x0 drivers out), but if there is something
missing, i will add it.
Expect the the upload to be finished in 15-20 minutes or so, but with
the list lag, it should be ready before this mail reaches you :)))
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:54:52AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 21:32, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > After 448 minutes of building, i have new 2.4.21 powerpc kernel packages
> > available for testing at :
> >
> > http://people.
suggested, just upload to sid and wait for bug reports.
> ^^
> Michel
>
> Yep. That's what unstable is for
Ok, i will be uploading them this evening, once i finish the new build
with the 128 DRM modules included, and having made kernel-package
believe i have a pmac.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
a pmac.
>
> Seems kernel-package could need a few patches, then.
Yep, altough i will have to read the docs doubly before i fill a
bugreport. Maybe setting the GUESS_ARCH variable will do.
> The kernel patch needs no change, right?
Yes and no, the problem would be if i want to build also the chrp
kernel, which needs a different GUESS_ARCH target.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
rants a debconf message.
>
> Anybody aware of a method of finding the gcc version that was used to
> build the running kernel, other than grepping /var/log/dmesg and
> hoping it is correct?
more /proc/version
should give you this info.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
nough i
think, no need to remove it, as it will be there again next time you
upgrade the kernel. You would have to reboot anyway, as the module seems
to be dead, and thus cannot be unloaded.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:45:17PM +0200, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti
Dutra wrote:
> Em Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:32:16 +0200, Sven Luther escreveu:
>
> > BTW, removing the parport module from your /etc/modules may be enough i
> > think, no need to remove it, as it will be the
y ? i see you are running startx
as root, which is not a good idea per see, but it seems tosearch stuff
in your home directory. Try it by being full root, or better yet, as a
user.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ard, since i think at
least the southbridge is apple's own and since you could use any HT
stuff anyway, this is no major problem. I have heard rumor as to the
northbridge being designed and manufactured by amd, but i have
difficulties believing that.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
t; If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy
> kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package but no kernel-image-2.4.21-benh
> package in Debian?
Because it is the 'stable' kernel ? Seriously, you find
kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package to be buggy, what bugs are you
exactly speaking and did you fill bug reports for them ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:31:33AM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 15:41:35 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:53:48PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy
> > >
nel source (or patch) is based
> on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no
> kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be
> impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be
> identical (right, Sven?).
False, Dan told me
.21-newpmac would be
> > > impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be
> > > identical (right, Sven?).
> >
> > False, Dan told me to use the linuxppc_2_4 tree, and that someone else
> > was packaging the benh tree. I don't kno
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:33:48PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 18:00:08 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i was busy at linuxtag/debconf this last days, and i did not have
> > very much time to read the lists, and thus i missed this one, but
> >
ve my AmigaOne's harddrive in the office PC
Does the AmigaOne also use the amiga partitioning scheme ? If yes, what
tool do you use for partitioning, and could you perhaps send me your
RDB blocks ? (The first 64 or 128K of your harddisk will do, i think).
I have also seen that some modifications where made to amiga-fdisk, but
not forwarded to the amiga-fdisk maintainer.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:58:02PM +0200, Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> The AmigaOne currently eats whatever you throw at it (well, as long as
> you only throw MBR and RDB at it :-)), but I use MBR because that's what
Nice.
> we used when I installe
something such. I think some experiments where already made, but i don't
know if it is conclusive. The idea is to have the int10/vbe/whatever it
is read the bios, and then pass it to an x86 emulator to execute it and
intialize the card.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
x86 box which initializes it, dump the
register information, and use these values to initialize the card,
possibly with a specialized version of radeonfb or something such.
To do it right, you need the cards spec or something such though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 05:05:04PM +0200, Rose Humphrey wrote:
>
> Le dimanche, 3 aoû 2003, à 09:45 Europe/Paris, Sven Luther a écrit :
>
> >On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 03:21:41AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>
> >>No, as I said, this _won't_ work in general
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:03:42AM +0200, Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 05:05:04PM +0200, Rose Humphrey wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Le dimanche, 3 aoû 2003, à 09:45 Europe/Paris, Sven Luther a écrit :
> >>
> >&
d part of the
source packages are non-free (essentially fonts, but some documentation
as well), it takes the ftp-masters more time than usual to check it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
il
to debian-x, but i will attach here again.
Good luck compiling, and be aware, you need around 4Go of disk space,
and it took around 2 hours on my rather fast x86 box.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Various Debian changes to xfree86.cf and linux.cf, including better
support for gcc flags. Forward-ported
stallation arch.
As said, i believe that these kernels are actually all the same,
differentiating themselves only in the actual packaging needed to pass
them to the boot-loader or whatever.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
)
It is part of the DirectFB project, the library of which are already
apckaged. Look at the copyright file of these library for the link, but
it should be www.directfb.org or something such. And no, it is not
related to XFree86, or something such.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Read the README to understand how to use this resource.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 06:59:48AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:20:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there still people using the 2.2 kernel packages with testing or
> > unstable ? I don't speak about the 2.2
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:01:46AM +0200, Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 06:59:48AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> >
> >>On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:20:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hello,
> >
a good start, you need a kernel with devfs and automounting of it
though, which i don't think is configured in the kernel-images i built.
That said, it seems to fail right now due to glibc/mklibs #206531 :(((
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:05:21AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Aug 25 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Sarge will ship with debian-installer, which i doubt will fit on a
> > floppy disk on powerpc. Not sure though.
>
> Hummm, that's not good news. At least for me (I h
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:36:18AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:05:21AM -0300, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> > On Aug 25 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Sarge will ship with debian-installer, which i doubt will fit on a
> > > floppy disk
ut is that true with new powerbook and imac flatpanel's energy
> > management?
These use proprietary Nvidia drivers, most probably not even apple has
access to the source code of those, so no chance to change anything.
Maybe with some reverse engineering tools, and direct snooping of the
bus ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:15:28PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:49:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:05:21AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > > On Aug 25 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Sarge will ship with d
not yet in
unstable), which allow to nicely switch resolution from the gnome panel.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
t the Blackdown organization really
You are speaking about OOo 1.0.3 or the new 1.1 stuff ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:52:20AM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> > > Of course there is the Balckdown JDK 1.3.1 for PPC Linux that does work
> > > (I use it to build OOo with) but you are right the Blackdown organization
> > > really
> >
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:37:22PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:34, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > No, i am interested in building the debian OOo 1.1 packages, will give
> > it a try next week, or earlier if i find time.
>
> Then look at the d
trd are very nice to install debian. You only need one file,
you boot it, and then you can do a full network install with them, or
even install from the woody CD-ROMs.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 09:19:38AM -0500, Alumbaugh, Tony wrote:
> Sven,
> Thanks for your help. I downloaded the vmlinz-2.4.22-install as you
> suggested, but when I tried to boot my 43p from bootP (boot
> net:,10.31.196.5,,10.31.196.6), I got the following error message.
Mmm,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:59:10AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 09:19:38AM -0500, Alumbaugh, Tony wrote:
> > > Sven,
> > > Thanks for your help. I downloaded the vmlinz-2.4.22-install as you
since certain things are hardcoded for pegasos
(like parted instead of ddisk, and keymap possibilities), but maybe it
can do.
Also some steps (like kernel and modules installation) where removed, so
you need to do them by hand.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:13:53AM -0500, Alumbaugh, Tony wrote:
> Sven,
> As far as booting, that did the job!! Thanks. After I go through the
> install and reboot, it will not reboot. I have to boot net again, and none
> of the drives get mounted. (You were right about the ke
G_PMAC_BACKLIGHT set in your kernel config.
This is enabled in the kernel-images i build and upload.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
works fine (not obvious after the first keypress but pretty obvious after
> 15 of them) while his doesn't. Can only be missing backlight support if
> you ask me.
Mmm, maybe related to bug #202602
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:21:18PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-09-10 16:31:36 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > With 2.4.21, they never worked on my PowerBook (bug 202602).
> > > > Did anything change in 2.4.22?
> > >
> > > Can't tell
-150 I have?
Ok, i will try building one this afternoon, do you still need the initrd
embedded in it or not ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:27:22PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-09-10 17:52:22 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > But it still does not work for you ?
>
> Well, I have not tried since my last report. I'm still using
> 2.4.18-newpmac, which works correctly (except
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:01:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-09-11 11:20:22 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i suppose 1 year or so of development, and the closure of some
> > security related bugs.
>
> I thought that there were fixed in 2.4.18 too (since it
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:04:06AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-09-12 10:10:28 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i have sort of 2.4.22 package here, but as Herbert Xu has not yet
> > uploaded the 2.4.22 kernel-source package, they are of no use, so ...
>
> I don&
ybe be a good deciding factor for the
ATI executive to go forward in either of those routes. my guess is that
they need something like a 5000 monthly volume or so to consider the
second, and that they are not really all that keen on the first one.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:58:50PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 09:26, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Well, DRI won't work on the Radeon mobility 9600 included in this one. I
> > think we should start a petition or other such to ask ATI about eithe
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 04:58:37PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 16:48, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > That said, even if this was the case, it is not sure ATI will provide
> > such docs.
>
> Neither is it sure that they won't, this is all pure
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 06:45:50PM -0500, Alumbaugh, Tony wrote:
> Sven,
> Did you ever find time to build the 43p Kernel? I do not see my response to
> your question about initrd in the list archive, I must have hit exit instead
> of send. No, I do not think I need initrd in this ke
chel could
you look into it if we want to have debian-installer support for apus),
and mbx, altough i am not sure we support this one.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 10:16:15AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am lmost ready to generate kernel-image packages for the various
> different subarches, but i have still a few questions which needs to be
> solved.
>
> 1) Well, doing this without changes to make
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:13:19AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 10:16, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Still apus would use its own kernel (which does not build udebs, Michel
> > could you look into it if we want to have debian-installer support for
&g
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:17:57PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 09:20, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:13:19AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 10:16, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
701 - 800 of 2629 matches
Mail list logo
