Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:24:06PM +0200, thomas graichen wrote: > > gcc -O1 -g -DNDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include '-DVERSION="1.2.4"' > > -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 > > -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -o xfs_db -L../libxfs addr.o agf.o agfl.o agi.o > > attr.o attr

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:15:56PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote: > "David N. Welton" wrote: > > > > Andrew Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt > > > on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that > > > group

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

"David N. Welton" wrote: > > Andrew Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt > > on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that > > group. But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared > > to ReiserF

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

"David N. Welton" wrote: > > Andrew Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt > > on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that > > group. But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared > > to ReiserF

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

Andrew Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt > on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that > group. But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared > to ReiserFS, which is much newer piece of code. M

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

Just a friendly Jedi Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> No, but I hear that XFS works pretty well. > You mean XFS from Linus kernel tree? there are some patches on > penguinppc.org > Anyway i have trouble compiling mkfs.xfs I tried: > gcc version 2.95.4 20010319 (Debian prerelease) > gcc

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

"Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. What's the deal with ReiserFS on PPC? I'm happy to state the I'm running 2.4.4-pre7 with root on ReiserFS. I've got my kernels on an ext2 partition until yaboot can read off ReiserFS. I'm now copying /home onto ReiserFS as well, so pretty soo

Re: xfs kernel patch (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 06:22:43PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Can you tell us where you found this patch ? > > The only kernel patch I can find is over a month old, and certainly not > xfs 1.0. Or has the filesystem made its way to one of tge PPC kernel > repositories ? > Or is the patch for S

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 04:20:00PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > gcc -O1 -g -DNDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include '-DVERSION="1.2.4"' > > -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 > > -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -o xfs_db -L../libxfs addr.o agf.o agfl.o agi.o > > attr.o attr

xfs kernel patch (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

On 07 May 2001 00:03:43 +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 05:41:52PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote: > > Andrei Verovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > > > > > > Kernel compilation co

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

> gcc -O1 -g -DNDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include '-DVERSION="1.2.4"' > -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 > -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -o xfs_db -L../libxfs addr.o agf.o agfl.o agi.o > attr.o attrshort.o bit.o block.o bmap.o bmapbt.o bmroot.o bnobt.o check.o > cntbt.o

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:22:18PM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > "Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > OK. What's the deal with ReiserFS on PPC? > > Ok. So I applied jeffm's endian patch to the reiserfsprogs from > debian, and hand patched the hunk from misc.c that failed. I c

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 09:52:11AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > This one bites me a bit. O_DIRECT is missing from bits/fcntl.h on powerpc > > (at least on my installation and i sure i didn't mess with libc6-dev). It's > > sid/unstable branch. I don't remeber if the intel box i compiled xfspro

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: === mkfile === gcc -g -DDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include '-DVERSION="1.2.4"' -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -c -o xfs_mkf

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

"Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. What's the deal with ReiserFS on PPC? Ok. So I applied jeffm's endian patch to the reiserfsprogs from debian, and hand patched the hunk from misc.c that failed. mkreiserfs runs fine, and after rebooting and choosing the kernel with the endian

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

"Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:04:32PM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > > "Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please > > > point your apt-ge

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:04:32PM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > "Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please > > point your apt-get at > > > > deb ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/debian-local sid main > > I

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

"Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please > point your apt-get at > > deb ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/debian-local sid main I would like to but your server is not responding to ftp requests... jas.

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > Nathan Scott from SGI send me patch but it didn't work. I now figured some > other way to fix that and it seems it partially worked (now it quits with: It looks like my "fix" made the trick (i mailed my solution to Na

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

"Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (and indeed Jeff Mahoney's patch didn't apply cleanly because of debian patch > but it was realy minor issue). I'll try to clean this patch a bit and submit > it both to Jeff Mahoney and Ed Boraas (Debian Maintainer). OK. Glad I wasn't o

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

Hi all! Just to let You know patched reiserfsprogs_3.x.0j-2.0.jedi1_powerpc.deb are available now at deb ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/debian-local sid main (and indeed Jeff Mahoney's patch didn't apply cleanly because of debian patch but it was realy minor issue). I'll try to clean this patch a bit

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:08:34PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > > > Patched 3.x.0j-2 is available here: > > ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/pub/debian-local/reiserfsprogs_3.x.0j-2ppc_powerpc.deb > > Great! =o > > > > (i've "bumped" revision number) > > Any pa

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > Patched 3.x.0j-2 is available here: > ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/pub/debian-local/reiserfsprogs_3.x.0j-2ppc_powerpc.deb Great! > (i've "bumped" revision number) Any package not in Debian proper should at least have two dots IMHO so that it doesn't interfere wi

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 08:58:45AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > "Jason E. Stewart" wrote: > > > > OK. What's the deal with ReiserFS on PPC? > > > > When I go to JeffM's page it lists the patch to > > reiserfsprogs3.x.0j. But debian already has a reiserfsprogs. However, > > when I try to run 'mkr

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

"Jason E. Stewart" wrote: > > OK. What's the deal with ReiserFS on PPC? > > When I go to JeffM's page it lists the patch to > reiserfsprogs3.x.0j. But debian already has a reiserfsprogs. However, > when I try to run 'mkreiserfs /dev/hda13' I just get a 'Usage: ...' > line. > > So I did a apt-get

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

OK. What's the deal with ReiserFS on PPC? When I go to JeffM's page it lists the patch to reiserfsprogs3.x.0j. But debian already has a reiserfsprogs. However, when I try to run 'mkreiserfs /dev/hda13' I just get a 'Usage: ...' line. So I did a apt-get source of resierfsprogs, but the patch does

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 05:41:52PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote: > Andrei Verovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > > > > Kernel compilation configuration tool (menuconfig, xconfig) presents > > RaiserFS, but no status d

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:17:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:20:30PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > That site doesn't say anything about 2.2.xx kernels. Does reiserFS work on > > Big-endian (sparc,PPC,m68k) with 2.2.xx? > > No. The above is vs 3.6.xx (ie reiserfs for 2.4)

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

Andrei Verovski wrote: > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > > Kernel compilation configuration tool (menuconfig, xconfig) presents > RaiserFS, but no status description (i.e. read-only, dongerous write, > etc.). JeffM's patches work great, in fact I've bee

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that group. But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared to ReiserFS, which is much newer piece of code. Maybe one day I'll have a chance to do a performan

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:11:02AM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 05:41:52PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote: > > > > No, but I hear that XFS works pretty well. > > > > That would make sense, since SGI's are Big-Endian like PPC. Except that it works extremely well on x86, too :)

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:20:30PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:38:37PM -0500, T E Whalen wrote: > > Andrei Verovski wrote: > > > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > > > > > > Kernel compilation configuration tool (menuconfig, xconfig

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:38:37PM -0500, T E Whalen wrote: > Andrei Verovski wrote: > > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > > > > Kernel compilation configuration tool (menuconfig, xconfig) presents > > RaiserFS, but no status description (i.e. read-only, d

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

Andrei Verovski wrote: > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > > Kernel compilation configuration tool (menuconfig, xconfig) presents > RaiserFS, but no status description (i.e. read-only, dongerous write, > etc.). I think that

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

Andrei Verovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > http://penguinppc.org/~jeffm Fully ported Unmerged in the main tree -- -jeramy b smith "Linux is Fun!" -Linus Torvalds __

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 05:41:52PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote: > Andrei Verovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > > > > Kernel compilation configuration tool (menuconfig, xconfig) presents > > RaiserFS, but no status d

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

Andrei Verovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? > > Kernel compilation configuration tool (menuconfig, xconfig) presents > RaiserFS, but no status description (i.e. read-only, dongerous write, > etc.). No, but I hear that X

RaiserFS PPC status

Hi, Anyone knows what is the status of RaiserFS support on PPC kernel 2.4.x? Kernel compilation configuration tool (menuconfig, xconfig) presents RaiserFS, but no status description (i.e. read-only, dongerous write, etc.). Thanks