"David N. Welton" wrote: > > Andrew Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt > > on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that > > group. But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared > > to ReiserFS, which is much newer piece of code. Maybe one day I'll > > have a chance to do a performance analysis between the two. They > > have different internal designs. > > http://bulma.lug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=626 > > It looks kind of simplistic, but I've also heard anectdotal evidence > that XFS is quite fast (and performs faster while being more stable > than Reiserfs).
But it's not as space efficient, is it? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project member
