Andrew Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt > on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that > group. But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared > to ReiserFS, which is much newer piece of code. Maybe one day I'll > have a chance to do a performance analysis between the two. They > have different internal designs.
http://bulma.lug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=626 It looks kind of simplistic, but I've also heard anectdotal evidence that XFS is quite fast (and performs faster while being more stable than Reiserfs). -- David N. Welton Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/ Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/ Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/ Work: http://www.innominate.com/
