On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:12:33AM +0100, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> [Running Debian/Lenny powerpc on an iBook.]
> After upgrading from postgresql-8.1 to pg_8.3 I lost the capacity to
> connect to my databases.
> Besides that I just found out that 'pidof' doen'
Hi all!
[Running Debian/Lenny powerpc on an iBook.]
After upgrading from postgresql-8.1 to pg_8.3 I lost the capacity to
connect to my databases.
Besides that I just found out that 'pidof' doen't seem to work for the
ordinary user, as far as postgresql is concerned, whereas it work
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 08:36, franck routier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just apt-get upgrade on my debian ppc box with sid.
> Now, postgresql doesn't start anymore on startup.
>
> In /var/log/postgresql.log, I have the following message (from memory) :
>
> lib : libreadline
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/postgresql/postgresql_6.5.3.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/postgresql/postgresql_6.5.3-27.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/postgresql/postgresql_6.5.3-27.diff.gz
This package requires a recompilation and upload to stable for
At 2:30 AM +0200 10/2/01, Robert Ramiega wrote:
another way might be to have a look at /var/lib/dpkg/info/postgresql.*rm
and see what they are trying to do and help them in some way (like
commenting out those troublesome line)
Thanks, that was the hint I needed. I am now 100% certified
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:19:50PM -0700, Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Thing is, when I try to apt-get remove postgresql or dpkg -P
> postgresql, the script that runs before removal wants to start
> postmaster, and fails when it can't start.
>
> Can anyone p
I've got a munged up postgresql configuration on my machine, and I'd
like to get rid of the whole thing. Don't care about data, I just
want to remove it all and start over.
Thing is, when I try to apt-get remove postgresql or dpkg -P
postgresql, the script that runs before r
w
I'm registered to build postgresql. If you guys would bother to check the
package status database you would have seen that :-)
It's building as we speak.
Michael
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So who's going to build this?
Dan has changed voltaire to start processing non-US so this should no
longer be an issue.
--
James
(Please trim the list of recipients)
Russell Hires wrote:
>
> Yeah, sure, I'll build the postgresql stuff... I've done it before on m68k,
> and on PPC, so ... just tell me what to do
As you're not a developer, you can't really help. Thanks for offering thou
Yeah, sure, I'll build the postgresql stuff... I've done it before on m68k,
and on PPC, so ... just tell me what to do
Russell
On Saturday 25 August 2001 15:06, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> From non-us.debian.org:
> $ madison postgresql
> postgresql | 7.1release-4 |
>From non-us.debian.org:
$ madison postgresql
postgresql | 7.1release-4 | testing | source, alpha, i386
postgresql |7.1.1-4 | unstable | hurd-i386
postgresql |7.1.2-1 | unstable | hppa
postgresql |7.1.2-5 | unstable | powerpc
postgresql |7.1.
Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > True, but why don't you just download the latest version from
> > > unstable/non-US? Is there something wrong about these packages?
> >
> > Dunno, I had assumed Russell was trying to build them himself for a reason.
>
> Well, it was a good exercise in 'why did they
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > and won't show the corresponding Intel (or other highest) version for
> > > comparison.
> >
> > apt-show-source can be helpful for that.
>
> Didn't work with apt 0.5.3 ...
It's a separate package. Its drawback is that it only shows the versions of
installed binary pa
> > Won't work without a Debian machine,
>
> Well, if you're not on a Debian machine, what do you care about this?
To check on potential work needing done, in order to feed some of it to my
Powerbook later.
> > and won't show the corresponding Intel (or other highest) version for
> > compariso
Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > Regarding 'check what's available' - is there any public access script
> > > (cgi or otherwise) to query the master archive on the exact version
> > > installed for a particular architecture? The pathetic 'Search Package
> > > Directories' interface doesn't qualify,
> > Regarding 'check what's available' - is there any public access script
> > (cgi or otherwise) to query the master archive on the exact version
> > installed for a particular architecture? The pathetic 'Search Package
> > Directories' interface doesn't qualify, or course (try searching for any
>
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > People should check what's available before trying to build themselves.
>
> Regarding 'check what's available' - is there any public access script
> (cgi or otherwise) to query the master archive on the exact version
> installed for a particular architecture? The pathet
> > True, but why don't you just download the latest version from
> > unstable/non-US? Is there something wrong about these packages?
>
> Dunno, I had assumed Russell was trying to build them himself for a reason.
Well, it was a good exercise in 'why did they invent sbuild' if nothing
else.
>
with PoPy, which I
believe required a later version of postgresql than 6.5.x. But I couldn't
apt-get a decent postgresql version, and I had successfully built 7.0.3 with
some serious help from the maintainer Oliver Elphick on potato-m68k, so I
figured I wouldn't have too much trouble. Ev
[ I'm on the list, no need to CC me ]
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With APT 0.5 or later, apt-get build-dep postgresql should install all
> build-dependencies for postgresql.
Also, it should be mentioned that recent apt versions grok
apt-get install postgresql/u
Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > The Build-Depends: for postgresql include libssl-dev, so that's the
> > > one you want.
> >
> > With APT 0.5 or later, apt-get build-dep postgresql should install all
> > build-dependencies for postgresql.
>
>
> > The Build-Depends: for postgresql include libssl-dev, so that's the
> > one you want.
>
> With APT 0.5 or later, apt-get build-dep postgresql should install all
> build-dependencies for postgresql.
True, but why don't you just download the latest version
> > but it appears that it depends on postgresql > 7.0.3. I'm surprised
> > that woody is using 6.5. I realize debian's conservative philosophy,
> > but I at least thought we'd be at version 7.0...
> >
> > Anyone have any thoughts about this?
>
Okay, with the latest advice I managed to compile and package postgresql. But
before I could that, I had to get more stuff (easily apt-able):
libreadline4-dev libperl-dev tk8.3-dev sharutils tcl8.3-dev
Of course, now I can't install it. dpkg -i tells me that there is a
conflict with libg
ous methods of getting the 'crypto' library
> > installed, and none of them worked. I've found that the 'crypto'
> > library is variously three different libs, or one.
>
> The Build-Depends: for postgresql include libssl-dev, so that's the
> one you wan
Russell Hires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I checked through that group of postings (after you mentioned this,
> I should have checked first), and very little of it actually
> revolved around postgresql, that I could tell. They were related,
> but not about the actual Subject:
>
> Funny you mention this, as there was a thread a while back with almost
> the exact same subject (except postgresql wasn't capitalized).
I checked through that group of postings (after you mentioned this, I should
have checked first), and very little of it actually r
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:40:03PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> In this case, however, I think PostgreSQL 7.0 is in sid. Why it's not
> in testing, I'm not sure. But you should be able to dpkg-buildpackage
> it yourself anyways.
its not in testing because its buggy
Russell Hires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to install zope-popy and python-popy for my zope install,
> but it appears that it depends on postgresql > 7.0.3. I'm surprised
> that woody is using 6.5. I realize debian's conservative philosophy,
> but I
I'm trying to install zope-popy and python-popy for my zope install, but it
appears that it depends on postgresql > 7.0.3. I'm surprised that woody is
using 6.5. I realize debian's conservative philosophy, but I at least thought
we'd be at version 7.0...
Anyone have
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I've created a snapshot of my chroot for Michel and others, it's at
> ftp.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de:/pub/linux/powerpc/debian/buildd/. A quick
> setup guide for using the chroot is there as well.
Thanks, I'll give it a try when I have more bandwidth again...
--
Earthl
> > the first ten or so packages. If any of these turn out to be taken by
> > someone else when it gets around to checking them out, too bad, print a
> > log message and proceed with the ones that were taken successfully.
>
> Yes, I understand that. It's duplication of log processing that I
> me
e database is a matter of being in the voltaire
> group, right?
Actually, no. Take a closer look at the buildd configuration in /etc,
and the script in ~buildd/bin/. The master database is actually on
another machine, and the one on voltaire is slaved to it.
> postgresql built fine on my
egal
anyway :-P
But write access to the database is a matter of being in the voltaire
group, right?
postgresql built fine on my Lombard and has been uploaded to pandora in
the meantime. Is there a debian-devel-powerpc-changesd list to send
announcements to from dupload?
Michael
> > > The wanna-build CVS is public - it allows anonymous pserver, though I
> > > don't remember the account name.
> >
> > anonymous perhaps. I just don't recall the host name. Using CVS has some
> > benefits (as in: sbuild should know /var/state/apt moved to /var/lib/apt,
> > and maybe there's s
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 10:26:40PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> So set up a mailing list for the log mails, or rather two separate lists
> for successful and failed logs (in my experience, the failed packages are
> a lot more work). It doesn't hurt to have more than one reply for the
> latter (b
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:24:09PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Fine, I'll be happy to answer any questions that might arise. If you have
> > > access to the wanna-build CVS, get the stuff there. Otherwise, use the
> > > latest source at http://people.debian.org/~cts/wanna-build/ and build i
> > Well, that aspect of administration wasn't what I thought you were talking
> > about, obviously. I didn't forget you said that before, and I wasn't
> > suggesting something along 'just set up a bunch of buildds, Dan is going
> > to take care of the rest'.
>
> Right, I didn't think you did. So
> > Fine, I'll be happy to answer any questions that might arise. If you have
> > access to the wanna-build CVS, get the stuff there. Otherwise, use the
> > latest source at http://people.debian.org/~cts/wanna-build/ and build it
> > on your PPC (just did that). Install sbuild and buildd and get sb
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > It's administration of multiple daemons for one architecture that is
> > > > the real issue. I'm still trying to come up with a good solution for
> > > > this - it's about half written, I think...
> > >
> > > We're currently
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:48:56PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > We're currently running six machines for m68k. One has the database
> > > locally, the others use ssh for wanna-build. I fail to see the problem
> > > here (other than getting enough people to process the logs, of course).
> >
>
> > We're currently running six machines for m68k. One has the database
> > locally, the others use ssh for wanna-build. I fail to see the problem
> > here (other than getting enough people to process the logs, of course).
>
> Although my time is limited, I'm willing to do my share of this work if
> > > It's administration of multiple daemons for one architecture that is
> > > the real issue. I'm still trying to come up with a good solution for
> > > this - it's about half written, I think...
> >
> > We're currently running six machines for m68k. One has the database
> > locally, the others
> Michael Schmitz wrote:
>>
>> > > Which, of course, raises the question: why isn't there a powerpc buildd
>> > > outside the US? Related question: why is Dan the only one running a
>> > > powerpc buildd? Is tervola still down? Any other powerpc machines on
>> > > permanent net connection that cou
> > > > I see it's in non-US, is there a buildd for that?
> > >
> > > No, there isn't at present.
> >
> > Voltaire is a dual-processor machine, right? Could it run another
> > buildd for non-US packages? Or would we need to actually build the
>
> Being dual-processor has nothing to do with it :)
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 10:32:43PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> [ I'm on the list, no need to CC me ]
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I see it's in non-US, is there a buildd for that?
> >
> > No, there isn't at present.
>
> Voltaire is a dual-processor machine, right?
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:09:52PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Being dual-processor has nothing to do with it :) It could build
> > non-US, but is not allowed to.
>
> Which, of course, raises the question: why isn't there a powerpc buildd
> outside the US? Related question: why is Dan the o
> > Which, of course, raises the question: why isn't there a powerpc buildd
> > outside the US? Related question: why is Dan the only one running a
> > powerpc buildd? Is tervola still down? Any other powerpc machines on
> > permanent net connection that could be used for this?
>
> It's administrat
> If you'd set up the cgi-bin script to query (only --info and --list=) the
> database via web interface I wouldn't even need to log on to voltaire.
Forget that one - I found your cgi-bin script by accident. From 129 non-US
packages in main, 94 haven't been build at all (according to the script),
Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > Which, of course, raises the question: why isn't there a powerpc buildd
> > > outside the US? Related question: why is Dan the only one running a
> > > powerpc buildd? Is tervola still down? Any other powerpc machines on
> > > permanent net connection that could be u
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:25:50PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Which, of course, raises the question: why isn't there a powerpc buildd
> > > outside the US? Related question: why is Dan the only one running a
> > > powerpc buildd? Is tervola still down? Any other powerpc machines on
> > > p
[ I'm on the list, no need to CC me ]
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I see it's in non-US, is there a buildd for that?
>
> No, there isn't at present.
Voltaire is a dual-processor machine, right? Could it run another
buildd for non-US packages? Or would we need to actually
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:49:14AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know what's up with the main postgresql package in powerpc
> > sid? It doesn't appear to be in the archive, and I didn't see a
> > failed build lo
Colin Walters wrote:
>
> Does anyone know what's up with the main postgresql package in powerpc
> sid? It doesn't appear to be in the archive, and I didn't see a
> failed build log on voltaire. The postgresql-doc package is
> available, though, which indicates
Does anyone know what's up with the main postgresql package in powerpc
sid? It doesn't appear to be in the archive, and I didn't see a
failed build log on voltaire. The postgresql-doc package is
available, though, which indicates the buildd must have at least tried
to build the po
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 10:40:46AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Please! That's not an adequate solution... I know it requires a little
> more work, but people need to sit down and figure out the problems with
> gcc, not just ignore them. -O0 is a real penalty.
Sorry it's not my sollution.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 10:05:58PM +0100, Robert Ramiega wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:19:59PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Georg Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reported the following bug, which I
> > cannot reproduce on Intel architecture:
> [snip]
> >
> > Has any other PowerPC user experien
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:19:59PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Georg Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reported the following bug, which I
> cannot reproduce on Intel architecture:
[snip]
>
> Has any other PowerPC user experienced this, please?
I guess it's all caused by the optimisation turned on in
Georg Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reported the following bug, which I
cannot reproduce on Intel architecture:
Title: typeidTypeRelid: Invalid type - oid = 0 when trying to look at tables
Package: postgresql
Version:
On Fri, Jul 09, 1999 at 09:52:28PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Robert Ramiega wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 05:17:48PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> >> The latest beta release (6.5 beta3) is currently being uploaded to
> >
> > Postgresql packages for
Robert Ramiega wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 05:17:48PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>> The latest beta release (6.5 beta3) is currently being uploaded to
>
> Postgresql packages for PowerPC are buggy because they cannot destroydb. Th
>is
>can be
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 05:17:48PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> The latest beta release (6.5 beta3) is currently being uploaded to
Postgresql packages for PowerPC are buggy because they cannot destroydb. This
can be solved by turning off optimisation (that is using -O instead of -O2)
as
The latest beta release (6.5 beta3) is currently being uploaded to
www.debian.org/~elphick/postgresql. This incorporates patches you sent
me yesterday for Linux on Alpha. (I set optimisation to -O throughout in
src/template/linux_alpha.) It will be available as soon as the index.html
page
>ftp.postgresql.org.
The files are now available at www.debian.org/~elphick/postgresql/
--
Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
>The tarball on your site is fubar :-( It's only showing as being 2.77 MB
>or so when it should be more like 5MB.
I exceeded my disk quota. I've changed the link to point to
ftp.postgresql.org.
--
Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
>
>On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
>> I have put together a preliminary release of 6.5 (beta2) and the source
>> for it can be obtained from http://www.lfix.co.uk/postgresql. Could you
>> please try to build that an
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> I have put together a preliminary release of 6.5 (beta2) and the source
> for it can be obtained from http://www.lfix.co.uk/postgresql. Could you
> please try to build that and send me any diffs you may need to make.
The tarball on your site
Christopher C Chimelis wrote [re postgresql]:
>Speaking of which...I've been working on the Alpha port and have been
>wrestling with 6.4.2 and the 6.5beta1 for awhile now. I finally got it to
>compile and run (using bare upstream source), but using the patched
>source
I have been in communication with postgresql maintainer (Oliver Elphick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), because it would not build out of the box on
a powerpc till version 6.4.2-4. We fixed it and now -5 will build and
create most packages but libpgperl. The perl interface is hell to
understand.
70 matches
Mail list logo
