Børge Holen wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007 01:19:28 Roy Butler wrote:
Børge Holen wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007 01:00:11 Roy Butler wrote:
I went ahead with update-notifier's suggestion today to upgrade Open
Office. It all went well, until it got to openoffice.org-gcj. Th
On Thursday 06 December 2007 01:58:20 Roy Butler wrote:
> Roy Butler wrote:
> > I went ahead with update-notifier's suggestion today to upgrade Open
> > Office. It all went well, until it got to openoffice.org-gcj. The old
> > version apparently has post-removal scripts
Roy Butler wrote:
I went ahead with update-notifier's suggestion today to upgrade Open
Office. It all went well, until it got to openoffice.org-gcj. The old
version apparently has post-removal scripts that return an error code,
breaking the whole process.
Anyone else run into this
On Thursday 06 December 2007 01:19:28 Roy Butler wrote:
> Børge Holen wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 December 2007 01:00:11 Roy Butler wrote:
> >> I went ahead with update-notifier's suggestion today to upgrade Open
> >> Office. It all went well, until it got
Børge Holen wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007 01:00:11 Roy Butler wrote:
I went ahead with update-notifier's suggestion today to upgrade Open
Office. It all went well, until it got to openoffice.org-gcj. The old
version apparently has post-removal scripts that return an error code,
bre
On Thursday 06 December 2007 01:00:11 Roy Butler wrote:
> I went ahead with update-notifier's suggestion today to upgrade Open
> Office. It all went well, until it got to openoffice.org-gcj. The old
> version apparently has post-removal scripts that return an error code,
> b
I went ahead with update-notifier's suggestion today to upgrade Open
Office. It all went well, until it got to openoffice.org-gcj. The old
version apparently has post-removal scripts that return an error code,
breaking the whole process.
Anyone else run into this today? If so, h
On Dec 03 2004, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
> OO is included in debian sid, but since the last update (several days
> ago), one of its component packages is missing and, thus, it cannot be
> upgraded/installed due to unsatisfied dependencies (hopefully this
> will be fixed in the near futures, but i
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:07:00PM -0800, Michael Valdes wrote:
> Argh!!! I've been trying to install OpenOffice.org
> with no success. Let me tell you what I've tried:
>
> I've tried to download it from YDL's FTP site but the
> setup gude doesn't
roblem the OP has?
Timo Reimerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> actually I think OpenOffice is included in the common debian-release?
> All I did was
> apt-get update
> apt-cache search openoffice
> apt-get install openoffice.org
> (some more packages that I con
actually I think OpenOffice is included in the common debian-release?
All I did was
apt-get update
apt-cache search openoffice
apt-get install openoffice.org
(some more packages that I considered usefull)
from the same repository I used to install (I think it was
uni-erlangen). But I am
Argh!!! I've been trying to install OpenOffice.org
with no success. Let me tell you what I've tried:
I've tried to download it from YDL's FTP site but the
setup gude doesn't correspond to the contents of what
the installer files should have. It's says to compile
it f
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:00:50PM -0400, Ed Sutherland wrote:
> How do I get OpenOffice to spell-check my documents? Am I missing a
> package? Whenever I select "Spellcheck" from the Tools menu, OpenOffice
> says spell-checking is complete -- although there are some words spelled
> incorrectly
How do I get OpenOffice to spell-check my documents? Am I missing a
package? Whenever I select "Spellcheck" from the Tools menu, OpenOffice
says spell-checking is complete -- although there are some words spelled
incorrectly on purpose.
AbiWord correctly spell checks my documents, but I prefer
"Kevin B. Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If we use the debian packages, can these facilities be added in later?
> > Or is it too late because they have been compiled out of the code?
> >
> > I've been trying to use the Report Wizard and the docbook filter and
> > haven't been able to m
Hi Jason,
If we use the debian packages, can these facilities be added in later?
Or is it too late because they have been compiled out of the code?
I've been trying to use the Report Wizard and the docbook filter and
haven't been able to make them work - this might explain why.
Yes, neither o
"Kevin B.Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (BTW. What kind of functionality Java brings to OOo that you don't have
> > in the first place ?)
> >
>
> Java is currently used both in the build itself and for
> - All accessibility features for handicapped and disabled (requires
> JDK 1.4.1)
Hi Ben,
Is this needed for the build or can it be built and JDK added later ?
The JDK is needed for a full normal build of OOo but Debian and others
use patches to disable Java since Java itself is not free. Much of the
functionality is present without the need for Java.
Actually, my ques
> They are actually very very close. In fact, you can actually use
> symlinks to fool OOo to accept the IBM JDK and then go ahead and use
> it.
>
> Once I reboot into PPC Linux I will dig up what symlinks I added and
> send them to you and you can use them temporarily until I get the
> sourc
n Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 02:28, Kevin B.Hendricks wrote:
FYI only,
OpenOffice.org announces OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 for PPC Linux is now
available on the StarDiv and YellowDog Linux Mirrors and selected
other
locations.
http://porting.openoffice.org/linuxppc/ppclinks.html
T
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 02:28, Kevin B.Hendricks wrote:
> FYI only,
>
> OpenOffice.org announces OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 for PPC Linux is now
> available on the StarDiv and YellowDog Linux Mirrors and selected other
> locations.
>
> http://porting.openoffice.org/linuxppc/pp
FYI only,
OpenOffice.org announces OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 for PPC Linux is now
available on the StarDiv and YellowDog Linux Mirrors and selected other
locations.
http://porting.openoffice.org/linuxppc/ppclinks.html
This contributed build was made on an almost stock YDL 3.0 machine and
FYI:
Tomorrow OOo 1.1.0 final for PPC Linux will/should be available on the
YellowDogLinux mirrors in pub/yellowdog/software/openoffice/
These are NOT debs but instead the Official OOo installer build done for PPC
Linux.
It should work on any system using late versions of glibc-2.3.1 (such as
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2003 9:36, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >
> > As it so happens, the official 1.1.0 version is finally released, so I'm
> > guessing that we can expect packages pretty soon, at this point. :)
>
> Actually, there's a build problem wit
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 9:36, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Adam Hewitt wrote:
> > I find it hard to believe that everyone who is running Sid has been
> > without Oo for the past two weeks (due to no openoffice.org-bin), can
> > someone tell me what the
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Adam Hewitt wrote:
> I find it hard to believe that everyone who is running Sid has been without
> Oo for the past two weeks (due to no openoffice.org-bin), can someone tell
> me what the deal is and what you have done to get around it??
As it so happens, the offic
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:27:31AM -0400, Kevin.Hendricks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Actually, I can make an OOo 1.1 RC5 ppc Linux available for Debian
> users if someone wants one. I was hoping to wait until it becomes OOo
> 1.1 final and then release it to the YDL mirrors, but if someone has
> some d
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 09:27, Kevin.Hendricks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Actually, I can make an OOo 1.1 RC5 ppc Linux available for Debian
> users if someone wants one. I was hoping to wait until it becomes OOo
> 1.1 final and then release it to the YDL mirrors, but if someone has
> some disk space I ca
Hi,
Adam Hewitt writes:
> I find it hard to believe that everyone who is running Sid has been
> without Oo for the past two weeks (due to no openoffice.org-bin),
> can someone tell me what the deal is and what you have done to get
> around it??
What I've always done, use L
> there.
>
> Yes, there are, in this directory:
>
> http://ftp.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/mirror/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/contrib/openoffice.org/
>
Hmm but those are not 1.1rc? binaries :-(
Cheers.
> ;)
>
> --
> David Oakes| /// Membe
David Oakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Hewitt wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I find it hard to believe that everyone who is running Sid has been
>
> > without Oo for the past two weeks (due to no openoffice.org-bin), can
> > someone tell me what the deal is
; Yes, there are, in this directory:
>
> http://ftp.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/mirror/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/contrib/openoffice.org/
Those don't show on the original vpn-junkies site, for some reason, btw.
Anyhow, it seems to be some early 1.1 beta, not even a release
; Yes, there are, in this directory:
>
> http://ftp.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/mirror/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/contrib/openoffice.org/
What you find there is 1.0.1, while Debian already offers 1.0.3, even though
i386 already is up to some 1.1rcX version.
--
Martin-Éric Racine
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
junkies.de/openoffice/pool/contrib/openoffice.org/
;)
--
David Oakes| /// Member: | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eastern Passage NS | \\\/// Team|
Canada | \XX/ AMIGA | ICQ #14502477
No wanna work. Wanna bang on keyboard.
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, David Oakes wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Oliver Ripka wrote:
>
> >>deb
> >>
> >> http://ftp.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/mirror/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/
> >>testing main,
> >
> >
> > That currently offers no PPC binaries. Howev
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Oliver Ripka wrote:
deb
http://ftp.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/mirror/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/
testing main,
That currently offers no PPC binaries. However, there is a file called:
debhelper_4.0.2.openoffice_all.deb
Pres
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Oliver Ripka wrote:
> According to Adam Hewitt on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:46:05PM +0800:
> > I find it hard to believe that everyone who is running Sid has been
> > without Oo for the past two weeks (due to no openoffice.org-bin), can
> > someone tell me
openoffice.org-bin), can
someone tell me what the deal is and what you have done to get around
it??
Actually, it has been more like a month since 1.0.99+1.1 was released
without openoffice.org-bin for anything other than i386, but nobody
should be without Oo. Since the new version is missing a dependancy
Adam Hewitt wrote:
Hi All,
I find it hard to believe that everyone who is running Sid has been
without Oo for the past two weeks (due to no openoffice.org-bin), can
someone tell me what the deal is and what you have done to get around
it??
Actually, it has been more like a month since 1.0.99
According to Adam Hewitt on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:46:05PM +0800:
> Hi All,
>
> I find it hard to believe that everyone who is running Sid has been
> without Oo for the past two weeks (due to no openoffice.org-bin), can
> someone tell me what the deal is and what you have done to
Hi All,
I find it hard to believe that everyone who is running Sid has been
without Oo for the past two weeks (due to no openoffice.org-bin), can
someone tell me what the deal is and what you have done to get around
it??
Cheers,
Adam.
Hi,
Adam Hewitt a écrit:
Hi All,
Does anyone happen to know why Openoffice.org doesn't have the
openoffice.org-bin (>= 1.0.99+1.1rc3) package available for unstable? I
have been waiting for like a week and a half with no package in site...
After lose a few hours, a workaround is to
Hi All,
Does anyone happen to know why Openoffice.org doesn't have the
openoffice.org-bin (>= 1.0.99+1.1rc3) package available for unstable? I
have been waiting for like a week and a half with no package in site...
Cheers,
Adam.
Le Jeudi 11 Septembre 2003 13:43, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Romain Chantereau wrote:
> > I wonder know why the rc3 binaries are not available for powerPC.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/206238
I can't understand why the compilation works for kevin's 1.1rc2 and not for
the deb. Is there a spe
We are pleased to announce that the release candidate of the next
version of the OpenOffice.org Office Suite - OpenOffice.org 1.1 - is now
available for download from:
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.1rc/index.html
For PPC Linux (Yellowdog 3 and other glibc-2.3.2
Torben Brosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install openoffice:
>
> added the various mirrors for powerpc openoffice.org to /etc/apt/sources.list
> then:
>
> apt-get install openoffice.org
>
> Reading Package Lists... done
Hej,
> # trying apt-get install openoffice.org-bin fails, too.
> How does one get a version of openoffice.org for
> debian3.0r1 2.4.18-newpmac
I also tried the various debian-powerpc mirrors first; but
it seemed impossible to resolve all dependencies and get
it installed (on powe
Hi,
I'm trying to install openoffice:
added the various mirrors for powerpc openoffice.org to /etc/apt/sources.list
then:
apt-get install openoffice.org
Reading Package Lists... done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requ
Hoi ..
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:58:36AM +0200, Chris Halls wrote:
>On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:45:39AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>What I am finding on the mirrors in pool/contrib/openoffice.org
>> doesn't make any sense. All I find for 1.1beta2 are non-arch
>> p
Hi.. I'm trying to apt-get openoffice.org but inspite of having added
the sources mentioned on
http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html I get the error
saying that openoffice.org-bin isn't installed. Why is it that this one
is not on the mirror? And what's the right pl
Trying to get openoffice.org 1.0.1-5.6rc to run of
my Debian woody PowerPC. Found the link to some PPC debs at
http://people.debian.org/~dwhendon/oo/
However, I guess there are some backported packages
from sid needed for it run on woody, namely packages
containing the required lbic6, libgcc
r-script, that installs automaticly
the OOo-Userinstallation, when the user starts openoffice the first
time.
Regards
Jan
--
.''`.Jan-Hendrik Palic |
: :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,..
`. `' http://www.deb
:25, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> > Hoi Folks,
> >
> > I have finished the OpenOffice.org build for debian-powerpc.
> > You can download the packages here:
>
> [...]
>
> > http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html
>
> I just tried out the ppc build
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 19:25, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> Hoi Folks,
>
> I have finished the OpenOffice.org build for debian-powerpc.
> You can download the packages here:
[...]
> http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html
I just tried out the ppc build on my tiBook(sid)
Hej Jan,
> >> I have finished the OpenOffice.org build for debian-powerpc.
> >> You can download the packages here:
> >> http://bourbaki.math.uni-kiel.de/~jpalic/OpenOffice.org
> >this is possibly a very dumb question, but...
> >the woody packages fail t
Hi ..
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 06:51:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I have finished the OpenOffice.org build for debian-powerpc.
>> You can download the packages here:
>> http://bourbaki.math.uni-kiel.de/~jpalic/OpenOffice.org
>this is possibly a very dumb questi
Hello Jan,
> I have finished the OpenOffice.org build for debian-powerpc.
> You can download the packages here:
>
> http://bourbaki.math.uni-kiel.de/~jpalic/OpenOffice.org
>
this is possibly a very dumb question, but...
the woody packages fail to install, claiming a dependency
Hoi Folks,
I have finished the OpenOffice.org build for debian-powerpc.
You can download the packages here:
http://bourbaki.math.uni-kiel.de/~jpalic/OpenOffice.org
or,
with apt-get from our mirrors (in a day). The list from our mirros can be found
at:
http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice
Hey All,
I just upgraded OpenOffice and it won't run. I get the splash screen,
then some debugging output:
SIOCGIFADDR got '00:00:00:00:00:00'
and then the splash screen just hangs around doing nothing.
I did an strace, and it sits waiting on a read:
[snip]
read(21, "[__Global_Printer_Def
sure how tight that buildroot is.
>Hmm ... that can be a problem. You mean, that there will be conflicts
>between the installed libs and the new buildeps of mozilla?
>Hmm
It works with the patches, I found for OpenOffice.org and gcc-3.2 ...
I have mozilla debian-packages here builded with
tainer too ;
but that is workin
Regards
Jan
--
.''`.Jan-Hendrik Palic |
: :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,..
`. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` `
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan,
Two things. You may need to deinstall mozilla before you rebuild
it as I'm not sure how tight that buildroot is. Second is to make
sure you get the latest version of the mozilla gcc 3.1/3.2 patch
that Franz made. I put a copy of it in a debian bug report against
mozilla-snapshot...
http://
Hi all,
people, who uses OpenOffice.org on debian-powepc might have seen, that,
when gcc-3.1.x is to be removed completely, OpenOffice.org will be
uninstalled as well.
This is a konsequense of the included mozilla-binaries, which are
included in the openoffice.org-1.0.1 source tree while
Hi Roland,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Roland Wegmann wrote:
>
> So, is there an source.list testing entry that works??
# Openoffice
#deb http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice testing main
contrib
/* untested ;-) */
>
> Thanks for your help in advance
You're
scripsit Roland Wegmann:
> Hello
>
> I will install OpenOffice 1.0.1 using apt-get install.
> Therefore I tried out all the source.list entries I found on
> http://linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html, but non of them worked.
>
> When I started apt-get update I got only error messages.
>
> S
Hello
I will install OpenOffice 1.0.1 using apt-get install.
Therefore I tried out all the source.list entries I found on
http://linux-debian.de/openoffice/mirrors.html, but non of them worked.
When I started apt-get update I got only error messages.
So, is there an source.list testing entry th
A.J.,
Thanks for testing the 1.0.1-3 release. I guess I should have
posted something here yesterday. I found problem with 1.0.1-3 was
a misplaced arch-specific registry file incorrectly packaged in the
non-arch debian package for openoffice.org. That flaw was fixed in
1.0.1-3
>>>>> "jack" == Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jack> Could we have as many folks here as possible give the new
openoffice.org
jack> 1.0.1-1 build on...
The 1.0.1-3 build seems to be working fine (for a small set of
documents that I t
Hello,
Could we have as many folks here as possible give the new openoffice.org
1.0.1-1 build on...
http://openoffice.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice
...a try. You should be able to get it, running on debian ppc sid,
by adding...
deb http://openoffice.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice unstable main
Announcing: OpenOffice.org 1.0.1 for PPC Linux
What is it?
--
OpenOffice.org provides a free (source LGPL and no $) almost drop-in
replacement for Microsoft Office and is available for Solaris (Sparc and
x86), Linux (x86 and PPC), WIN (NT, 200, XP, 98, 95, etc), and coming real
Hi ..
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 06:31:05PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> I only wanted to say, that you can upgrade to OpenOffice.org-1.0.1rc3
>> on PowerPC.
>Thanks for your work on this!
I did only my job .. :)
>> But I have to say, too, that the dependencies are broken
able main contrib
>
> Put this line into /etc/apt/sources.list and do:
>
> apt-get update ; \
> apt-get install openoffice.org openoffice.org-bin libstdc++4 \
> libgcc1lib stlport4.5gcc3.1
Besides the typo that Michel already pointed out:
~ $ /usr/bin/openof
gt;
> I only wanted to say, that you can upgrade to OpenOffice.org-1.0.1rc3
> on PowerPC.
Thanks for your work on this!
> But I have to say, too, that the dependencies are broken, but I am
> working on this issue.
>
> You need
> libstdc++4
> libstlport4.5gcc3.1 (>=4.
Hi ...
I only wanted to say, that you can upgrade to OpenOffice.org-1.0.1rc3
on PowerPC.
But I have to say, too, that the dependencies are broken, but I am
working on this issue.
You need
libstdc++4
libstlport4.5gcc3.1 (>=4.5.3-5cjh2)
libc6-2.2.5 (>=2.2.5-9.1)
except libstdc++4 you ca
74 matches
Mail list logo
