>
> GNU parted can resize ext2 partitions, and I think move them as well. The
> debian package of it is called parted.
>
I'm surprised it isn't called de-parted... :-)
I appreciate your response. I'm going to test the boot floppies,
assuming I can find them. So far, I've been looking in the
Peter Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you get ADB keyboards with a caps lock that I can set to Control_L, or
> should I just get a USB PCI card and USB keyboard?
I'm sure they're obscenely expensive by themselves, but the new apple
pro usb keyboards that come with the newword g4 desktop
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 09:00:20AM -0400, Russell Hires wrote:
> Well, I have /var on my / partition, because I started out small. I
> symlinked the directory where the .debs go when they download (when
> using apt-get) to my /home partition because / didn't have enough space
> when I first attemp
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:15:02PM -0400, Derek Homeier wrote:
> Ah, when I was using it I still used an old 8100 with mechanical
> CapsLock ;-)
Can you get ADB keyboards with a caps lock that I can set to Control_L, or
should I just get a USB PCI card and USB keyboard?
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
> > I should make you guys aware that the XFree86 test packages I have made
> > available contain David S. Miller's PCI domains patch. For the most part
> > this seems to affect only SPARC, but I don't want you guys to go chasing
> > shadows in stock 4.1.0 sources to troubleshoot issues that may
Hi,
After downgrading my libc6 from 2.2.3-1 to 2.2.2-1, because the upgrade
broke most of xmms' plugins and evolution (that even a recompile
couldn't fix), I'm stuck with a version of dpkg that requires libc6
2.2.3.
Does anybody have a binary of dpkg that I could use on a glibc 2.2.2
based system
No, we'll probaby have two keep different keymaps at least for the
international keyboards to work properly (no, haven't created a mac-de
yet, sorry!).
If such keymaps need to be created anyway, that can be done for Linux
keycodes
rigth away, can't it?
Yes, that's what I was talking about, o
Derek Homeier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:55:25PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:11:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > > These packages are better than 4.0.3-x in the sense that they set the
> > > model to "macintosh" instead of "pc104", too bad Xkb is br
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:55:25PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:11:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > These packages are better than 4.0.3-x in the sense that they set the model
> > to
> > "macintosh" instead of "pc104", too bad Xkb is broken now...
> >
>
> once w
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:16:22PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > build because ld.so.1 kept segfaulting when run by ldd on two of
> > mozilla's libraries (if anyone has any insight as to why that would
> > happen please speak up). the dependency lists look ok to me but if you
> > have obscure
> mozilla 0.9.1 has *finally* entered Debian proper, its been uploaded
> to non-US/main.
>
> Since we have no powerpc buildd there, the only binary packages are
> for i386.
0.9.1-2 (for unstable) just arrived on pandora. Untested, but that's
what unstable is for. Thanks for alerting me :-)
It usua
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:22:14AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
> Is there a way to avoid downloading the complete source again? I have 4.0.3,
> maybe I can rsync of patch or whatever? I ha
> Here is the lasest output of apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. It seems
> to be complaining about a Perl script, and will not go through with the
> upgrade. This seems serious; how can I fix this? I have tried running
> apt-get --reinstall on perl, perl-base and dpkg with no luck.
Reinstall deb
> At least, it worked in my case, I have compiled MOL 0.9.58-1 and 0.9.59,
> with glibc 2.2 and 2.2.17, and all the time MOL worked fine in both
> console and X mode.
How did you get MOL to build with 2.2.17? I've tried with 2.2.18pre18 but
I get missing symbols when loading the modules.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
Is there a way to avoid downloading the complete source again? I have 4.0.3,
maybe I can rsync of patch or whatever? I have space and fast access at
work, but only slow access at home (and no more sne
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > That's the case. I mean it should know all busses and does support all 3
> > > uninorth busses. Is it called properly for the AGP bus (bus 0) by XFree
> > > ?
> >
> >
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > That's the case. I mean it should know all busses and does support all 3
> > uninorth busses. Is it called properly for the AGP bus (bus 0) by XFree ?
>
> >From current lnx_video.c:
I should make yo
Previously Chris Tillman wrote:
> Is this right? perl is not listed as a dependency for apt.
I bet the problem is a warning or error from debconf. apt does
not use perl.
> Would it be reasonable to store and keep up to date a local perl package
> backup to fall back on if perl is failing?
No, th
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:21:52PM -0700 or thereabouts, Peter Meilstrup
wrote:
>> Here is the lasest output of apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. It seems
>> to be complaining about a Perl script, and will not go through with the
>> upgrade. This seems serious; how can I fix this? I have tried r
Hi,
mozilla 0.9.1 has *finally* entered Debian proper, its been uploaded
to non-US/main.
Since we have no powerpc buildd there, the only binary packages are
for i386.
I have thus again updated my mozilla repository to include mozilla
0.9.1 packages, as usual they are built for potato but sho
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:50:19PM +0200, sisi wrote:
> so,
> apt-get dist-upgrade woody
> that's all right?
no use dselect. there are many packages that are split and apt-get
simply doesn't handle that (it ignores recommends).
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpg2b7qqNoL
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 04:30:08AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:04:57PM +0200, sisi wrote:
> > hoi all,
> >
> > i am trying to compile gimp 1.2, and it is asking for
> > GTK + 1.2.8 or higher. So... i would like to know whether
> > there is ximian stuff for debian power
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:21:52PM -0700, Peter Meilstrup wrote:
>
> Here is the lasest output of apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. It seems
> to be complaining about a Perl script, and will not go through with the
> upgrade. This seems serious; how can I fix this? I have tried running
> apt-get -
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> >
> >That's the problem, it doesn't work on AGP. outb works but inb segfaults.
> >
> >The syscall should only return an iobase for known working busses IMHO.
> At the
> >very least, it shouldn't return any for busses known not to work.
> >
>
> That's the case. I
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:04:57PM +0200, sisi wrote:
> hoi all,
>
> i am trying to compile gimp 1.2, and it is asking for
> GTK + 1.2.8 or higher. So... i would like to know whether
> there is ximian stuff for debian powerpc as i know
> that ximian for debian x86 has GTK + 1.2.10 ?
if you want
>
>That's the problem, it doesn't work on AGP. outb works but inb segfaults.
>
>The syscall should only return an iobase for known working busses IMHO.
At the
>very least, it shouldn't return any for busses known not to work.
>
That's the case. I mean it should know all busses and does support all
hoi all,
i am trying to compile gimp 1.2, and it is asking for
GTK + 1.2.8 or higher. So... i would like to know whether
there is ximian stuff for debian powerpc as i know
that ximian for debian x86 has GTK + 1.2.10 ?
or is there some other solution like compling GTK
myself (will i run into oth
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> >> We need a way to use multiple ioBases from inside xfree to fix the
> >> problem. The best solution will be to disable ISA I/O for now and get a
> >> better fix later on.
> >
> >No, that's not the solution. The solution is to get the kernel to return
> >the *co
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:52:18PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Ethan Benson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:45:25PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - Xkb doesn't work with Macintosh keycodes anymore, used to work with
> > > > 4.0.3
> > >
> >
Damien GUIHAL wrote:
>
> I'd like to know if anyone has build the ppc version of the
> libapache-mod-jk, which is tomcat plugger into apache, for servlet
> developpement. It appears that it exists only for ix86, is it too difficult
> to buils on other platforms ?
It build-depends on j2sdk1.3 whic
>> We need a way to use multiple ioBases from inside xfree to fix the problem.
>> The best solution will be to disable ISA I/O for now and get a better fix
>> later on.
>
>No, that's not the solution. The solution is to get the kernel to return
>the *correct* iobase for the sepecific devfn, right
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:21:52PM -0700 or thereabouts, Peter Meilstrup wrote:
> Here is the lasest output of apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. It seems
> to be complaining about a Perl script, and will not go through with the
> upgrade. This seems serious; how can I fix this? I have tried runnin
[ trimmed Branden and XFree86@XFree86.Org, this is none of their business. ]
Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> After upgrading to XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1.1 on my PowerMac G4 running
> Debian GNU/Linux, X doesn't work any more.
>
> Seemingly relevant lines from /var/log/XFree86.0.log: (full output below)
>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:49:22PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 06:24:56PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
> > Ethan, I need to reinstall the iMac anyway -- probably won't get to it
> > until this weekend, but perhaps sooner.
> >
> > If you need copies of CD's burnt for you, just
Installing DebianPPC on a new G3, the system don't recognize my sound
device, what can I do ?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 08:50:53AM +0200, Lorenzo De Vito wrote:
> What kind of security problem can I encounter changing the owner of my
> /dev/ttyS0 (modem) ?
>
> # chown -c myuser /dev/ttyS0
you don't need to do that. if you need to use the modem directly as
your normal user account add yours
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 06:24:56PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Ethan, I need to reinstall the iMac anyway -- probably won't get to it
> until this weekend, but perhaps sooner.
>
> If you need copies of CD's burnt for you, just let me know -- I'll need
> to talk to you in private mail about where to
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:21:36PM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> "Ethan Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:32:06AM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> > > "Ethan Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Is there anyone out there with the connectivity, di
Installing DebianPPC on a new G3, the system don't recognize my sound
device, what can I do ?
What kind of security problem can I encounter changing the owner of my
/dev/ttyS0 (modem) ?
# chown -c myuser /dev/ttyS0
???
What kind of security problem can I encounter changing the owner of my
/dev/ttyS0 (modem) ?
# chown -c myuser /dev/ttyS0
???
Hello,
After upgrading to XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1.1 on my PowerMac G4 running
Debian GNU/Linux, X doesn't work any more.
Seemingly relevant lines from /var/log/XFree86.0.log: (full output below)
XFree86 Version 4.1.0 / X Window System
(--) PCI: (1.21.0) ATI Rage 128 RE rev 0, Mem @ 0x8400/26,
42 matches
Mail list logo
