Previously Chris Tillman wrote: > Is this right? perl is not listed as a dependency for apt.
I bet the problem is a warning or error from debconf. apt does not use perl. > Would it be reasonable to store and keep up to date a local perl package > backup to fall back on if perl is failing? No, that would basically mean working around a real problem. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
