>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:02:44AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > Just nitpicking, but I'd like to see this worded a bit different,
> > perhaps as a clarification in the sense that programs compiled using
> > Imakefiles will be migrat
Seconded, in this form.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 02:44:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 04:45:01PM +0100, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> > So here's a little patch to fix the package names in the current
> > policy:
>
> I second this proposal, amended as
I think this change should say something about full screen support.
Otherwise, if 9term were modified such that -T is equivalent to -label,
it would get the highest priority -- but it emulates a printer.
--
Raul
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 03:27:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: debian
Seconded.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 03:44:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.2.1.2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This policy revision is long overdue, since the transition away from the
> current policy is actually largely complete already.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:43:12AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> I think this change should say something about full screen support.
Full screen support? What does that mean? Maximizable to the size of the
root window? Works well with the "screen" program?
> Otherwise, if 9term were modified suc
>>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The best path may be to get the http server packages to add in
>> the new script directory as an alias, and then put the change in
>> policy as a recommendation, and, later, when most packages have had a
>> chance to change, we can put in
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:43:12AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > I think this change should say something about full screen support.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:43:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Full screen support? What does that mean? Maximizable to the size of the
> root window? Works
>
>> Since lintian reports the absence of a manpage as an error, maintainers
>> (specially new maintainer) proceed to install a link pointing to
>> undocumented.7 instead of actually providing a manpage.
>
> The previous lintian maintainer was considering the idea of making the
> use of undo
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Jakob Bøhm wrote:
> Placing crypto software in any part of the main
> archive still has a very important legal problem:
> Sorry, to be putting down a nice idea, but I would
> hate to see the project getting in trouble from
> checking only US laws.
'non-US' seems to be a mis
Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
>
>
> 'non-US' seems to be a misnomer nowadays (as it has been
for some time
> already). Should it perhaps be replaced by 'crypto' and
'patented', so
> that both can be separately mirrored in different
countries?
>
> Remco
> --
Many crypto algorithms are patented, so there
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The previous lintian maintainer was considering the idea of making the
>> use of undocumented(7) a warning. (Which seems appropriate, since you
>> do have to have a bug report on file, which means that it's something
>> you *should* fix.) With t
Hi,
I think this proposal is too biased to UTF-8.
UTF-8 is mere one encoding out of many encodings in the world, though
it is an important one.
Thus, I propose to add
+ If the terminal emulator supports ISO-2022 encoding,
+ add 10 points.
+ If the terminal emulator
Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Jakob Bøhm wrote:
>
> > Placing crypto software in any part of the main
> > archive still has a very important legal problem:
>
>
> > Sorry, to be putting down a nice idea, but I would
> > hate to see the project getting in trouble from
> > check
13 matches
Mail list logo
