On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Jakob Bøhm wrote: > Placing crypto software in any part of the main > archive still has a very important legal problem: <snip>
> Sorry, to be putting down a nice idea, but I would > hate to see the project getting in trouble from > checking only US laws. 'non-US' seems to be a misnomer nowadays (as it has been for some time already). Should it perhaps be replaced by 'crypto' and 'patented', so that both can be separately mirrored in different countries? Remco -- qn-195-66-31-144: 10:55pm up 1 day, 4:19, 12 users, load average: 2.20, 2.05, 1.79
