On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:43:12AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > I think this change should say something about full screen support. On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:43:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Full screen support? What does that mean? Maximizable to the size of the > root window? Works well with the "screen" program?
9term does not have an addressable cursor. > > Otherwise, if 9term were modified such that -T is equivalent to -label, > > it would get the highest priority -- but it emulates a printer. > > What are you talking about? "The highest priority"? You've evaluated all > terminal emulators in Debian already? 9term supports ISO 10646 combining > characters at implementation level 3? Sorry -- I made the assumption that 9term's unicode support is good as it gets for the current stock of debian terminal emulators. You're right: this assumption could easily be false. > If 9term emulates a printer, why is it called a terminal emulator? More properly, it emulates a terminal where TERM=dumb gains you access to all of its features. ex works fine, but vi is rather silly. -- Raul
