On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:20:42PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> FWIW I don't mind if you tweak the wording.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately it's not just = 32 or 64[1]. Luckily the only
> >> ones that wo
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:20:42PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> FWIW I don't mind if you tweak the wording.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately it's not just = 32 or 64[1]. Luckily the only
> >> ones that wo
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> ]] Jonathan Nieder
>> Seconded. That makes two seconds by my count (me and ballombe).
>> Remember that any DD including the one who proposed a change can
>> second a proposal if they think it reflects consensus (or can solicit
>> more input if they think it needs it).
]] Jonathan Nieder
> Seconded. That makes two seconds by my count (me and ballombe).
> Remember that any DD including the one who proposed a change can
> second a proposal if they think it reflects consensus (or can solicit
> more input if they think it needs it).
I didn't realise you can secon
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> FWIW I don't mind if you tweak the wording.
>>
>> Unfortunately it's not just = 32 or 64[1]. Luckily the only
>> ones that would be relevant the way Debian uses are
>>
>> = 32 (mips, tilegx)
>> = 64
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:15:57AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> Thanks. Applied.
> >
> > Well, I was working on a patch that looks like:
> >
> > + The requirement for
> > /usr/lo
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:15:57AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Thanks. Applied.
>
> Well, I was working on a patch that looks like:
>
> + The requirement for /usr/local/lib
> + to exist if /lib or
> + /usr
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:15:57AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 613143 = pending
> quit
>
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > I second this as well, although I think it's unnecessary at this point.
>
> Thanks. Applied.
Well, I was working on a patch that looks like:
+ The req
tags 613143 = pending
quit
Russ Allbery wrote:
> I second this as well, although I think it's unnecessary at this point.
Thanks. Applied.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> Suggested change:
>>
>> --- /proc/self/fd/13 2011-02-13 09:12:50.142239544 +0100
>> +++ policy.sgml 2011-02-13 09:12:01.565231567 +0100
>> @@ -5993,6 +5993,13 @@
>>to get access to kernel information.
>>
Hi,
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Suggested change:
>
> --- /proc/self/fd/13 2011-02-13 09:12:50.142239544 +0100
> +++ policy.sgml 2011-02-13 09:12:01.565231567 +0100
> @@ -5993,6 +5993,13 @@
>to get access to kernel information.
>
>
> +
]] Aurelien Jarno
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:08:58AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Aurelien Jarno
> >
> > > How can we progress on this bug? We now have bugs #720777, #720778 and
> > > #720780 which ask for /usr/lib to be created if /lib exists.
> > > It's something that can be impleme
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:08:58AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Aurelien Jarno
>
> > How can we progress on this bug? We now have bugs #720777, #720778 and
> > #720780 which ask for /usr/lib to be created if /lib exists.
> > It's something that can be implemented, but before doing so, I wou
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:08:58AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Aurelien Jarno
>
> > How can we progress on this bug? We now have bugs #720777, #720778 and
> > #720780 which ask for /usr/lib to be created if /lib exists.
> > It's something that can be implemented, but before doing so, I wou
]] Aurelien Jarno
> How can we progress on this bug? We now have bugs #720777, #720778 and
> #720780 which ask for /usr/lib to be created if /lib exists.
> It's something that can be implemented, but before doing so, I would
> like to know if a decision has been taken wrt the policy.
I think the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 720777 by 613143
Bug #720777 [libc6-x32] libc6-x32: /usr/local/libx32 (required by FHS) doesn't
exist
720777 was not blocked by any bugs.
720777 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 720777: 613143
> block 720778 by 613143
Bug
block 720777 by 613143
block 720778 by 613143
block 720780 by 613143
thanks
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:08:33PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > ]] Steve Langasek
> >
> > > | How do we square that with
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:08:33PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Steve Langasek
>
> > | How do we square that with the FHS, then? The FHS says:
> > |
> > | If directories /lib or /usr/lib exist, the equivalent
> > | directories must also exist in /usr/local.
>
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Steve Langasek
> | How do we square that with the FHS, then? The FHS says:
> |
> | If directories /lib or /usr/lib exist, the equivalent
> | directories must also exist in /usr/local.
> |
> | That seems to require /usr/local/lib64 even if we *don't* include
> | /u
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
severity 613143 wishlist
usertags 613143 + normative discussion
quit
Hi Matthias, Aurelien, Santiago,
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Suggested change:
>
> --- /proc/self/fd/13 2011-02-13 09:12:50.142239544 +0100
> +++ policy.sgml 2011-02-13 09:12:01.565231
Package: debian-policy
]] Steve Langasek
| On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:02:33PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > ]] Yaroslav Halchenko
|
| > | please do not slap me too hard (only so that I feel your warm carrying
| > | touch):
|
| > | is there a rationale for: on amd64 Debian systems having
21 matches
Mail list logo
