On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:15:57AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 613143 = pending
> quit
> 
> Russ Allbery wrote:
> 
> > I second this as well, although I think it's unnecessary at this point.
> 
> Thanks.  Applied.

Well, I was working on a patch that looks like:

+                  The requirement for <file>/usr/local/lib&lt;qual&gt;</file>
+                  to exist if <file>/lib&lt;qual&gt</file> or
+                  <file>/usr/lib&lt;qual&gt</file> exists (where
+                  &lt;qual&gt; is either 32 or 64) is removed.

i.e. try to explain what <qual> is.

(Also I do not remember having seconded the patch, but it do not matter.)

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140508192551.GA9882@yellowpig

Reply via email to