Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:15:57AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Thanks. Applied. > > Well, I was working on a patch that looks like: > > + The requirement for <file>/usr/local/lib<qual></file> > + to exist if <file>/lib<qual></file> or > + <file>/usr/lib<qual></file> exists (where > + <qual> is either 32 or 64) is removed. > > i.e. try to explain what <qual> is. FWIW I don't mind if you tweak the wording. Unfortunately it's not just <qual> = 32 or 64[1]. Luckily the only ones that would be relevant the way Debian uses <qual> are <qual> = 32 (mips, tilegx) <qual> = 64 (mips, powerpc, x86) <qual> = x32 (x86) from https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList. > (Also I do not remember having seconded the patch, but it do not matter.) http://bugs.debian.org/613143#22 Thanks, Jonathan [1] The FHS just says "There may be one or more variants". https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html#LIBLTQUALGTALTERNATEFORMATESSENTIAL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140508195105.gd9...@google.com
