On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:15:57AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >> Thanks. Applied. > > > > Well, I was working on a patch that looks like: > > > > + The requirement for > > <file>/usr/local/lib<qual></file> > > + to exist if <file>/lib<qual></file> or > > + <file>/usr/lib<qual></file> exists (where > > + <qual> is either 32 or 64) is removed. > > > > i.e. try to explain what <qual> is. > > FWIW I don't mind if you tweak the wording. > > Unfortunately it's not just <qual> = 32 or 64[1]. Luckily the only > ones that would be relevant the way Debian uses <qual> are > > <qual> = 32 (mips, tilegx) > <qual> = 64 (mips, powerpc, x86) > <qual> = x32 (x86) >
However the FHS version mandated by policy does not include libx32, so it could be argued that there is no need for a FHS exception for libx32. > from https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList. Thanks for the link. > > (Also I do not remember having seconded the patch, but it do not matter.) > > http://bugs.debian.org/613143#22 Indeed! Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140508201313.GB9882@yellowpig
